Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Removing a 3 default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3056 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, after reading up on defaults by phone companies I have set about removing a default registered on my credit file by 3 in 2005, it wasn’t until I bought a buy to let property that I even knew about the default, as I have been trying to repair my credit rating since leaving collage, A default notice would have been prioritized if I was aware of it. On my credit file it appeared I had defaulted for £81 however when I contacted Experian they investigated it, contacted 3 and they came back with it being settled, this was as much as Experian could do apparently.

Now I had canceled the contract and moved to Orange after my 12 months were up and the 3 phone was cut off and to my understanding paid up in full.

After doing some reading I see that they are not the same as removing a default from a credit agreement, I was going to use these letters on here http://www.learnmoney.co.uk/credit-cards/remove_default_notice.html however am I right in thinking that that would be wrong?

 

What is the best way of attempting to get this default removed as I am 100% sure that I did not receive any notice of this default? And I’m sure the correct procedure wasn’t followed. Any help would be most appreciated, thanks James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you'd be wrong. Your agreement was NOT regulated by the CCA, this was simply a service contract so not 'Notice of Default' is required. You were simply defaulted because you didn't pay your bill - something they can do easily. See the 'sticky' (above) on Mobile Phones and the CCA.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed-broadband/70464-mobile-phone-companies-consumer.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, I have read many of your posts which have been very helpful, I have gone straight to the credit scoring companies as I didn’t actually owe the money, 3 have ignored all my polite letters so far. Equifax were the ones who got the defaulted £84 removed and now shows as settled, but as I didn’t owe the money this is not satisfactory. Experian who proved very helpful have now raised the point with 3 and should they not answer satisfactorily within the 28 days they can remove the default, The nice bloke I spoke to said that means if they haven’t got my papers in order they can’t keep the default on my credit file. Wouldn’t have minded so much if I did owe the money. Thanks again James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of the most useful 'get outs' that still remains useful to consumers who want to clear their files, the problem is when a firm (mobile phone network) employ enough people who simply say to Experian that the debt exists and/or was valid. The CRA won't seek clarification or 'proof' that the debt existed, just the work of the firm making the original complaint. Now, with 3UK and their Indian Call Centres, this becomes as much of an issue (for them) in the same way UK customer's don't get satisfactory communications. CRAs are pretty much in the same situation, and if their enquiries are not resolved, the disputed files are cleared because the network is not prepared to assert that their data is correct.

 

Not an ideal situation you'll agree - especially for those firms who just want to be vindictive - but at least there is hope!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I have a reply from Equifax, pretty much the same as I received last time with them, my big issue with 3 is that I didn’t owe them the £82 in the first place so I don’t want it shown as settled I want the default removed, the response I received was so typical of “the computer says no” attitude large companies are taking.

 

I have conducted a full review of your 3 account and I can now confirm that your Credit file has been amended to show outstanding balance has been paid and account is now settled. The payment history will remain on the credit file as a true reflection of how the account was managed. Please note this can take up to 30 days to take effect. Regards, 3, Credit Referrals”

 

Word perfect answer to my last complaint to Equifax, another thing that has annoyed me with this is the way Equifax close the issue with the statement “solved”! It’s far from that.

 

My only hope now is the nice guy at Experian doesn’t receive the same cut and pasted email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused - Equifax would have no idea that the debt listed originally was unjustified, only 3UK could ascertain this - so the next step from having it correctly shown as 'settled' is to get 3UK to remove it as the only reason it was there was because of their billing error. No?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but 3 do not respond to my letters or phone calls so my other option was to ask the CRA’s to question it, however obviously they don’t have to have proof of the default just a response from 3 which is more than I seem able to do. I suppose it was in hope that 3 responded to them as efficiently as they do with me that would be one way of removing the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any documentation you have from 3UK that admits to their original error? CRAs would accept this in the absence of a formal response on the cause of the problem.

 

Alternatively, you could write by RD to 3UK admin HQ in Glasgow and try and force a response that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly I don’t have any documentation from 3 as it was several months if not a year before I was made aware of the default and I had shredded the phone bills, a default notice would have been dealt with asap as we were repairing our credit rating to start our buy to let properties. The original amount they say I defaulted on was marked as settled after my first complaint to the CRA’s which confuses me as I had never paid anything after my final bill.

Would a SAR be of any use to me, this should tell me where they think the money is owed from? To be honest I have been concentrating on removing the default as opposed to finding out why they think I owed them in the first place. One of my main reasons on leaving 3 was their poor customer service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Still ongoing, Experian have at least placed a comment on my CR, what use that will be I’m unsure, however they still haven’t had a reply from 3, when I asked what they can do next as I was told that no response after 28 days they can remove the default, the lady I spoke to now stated that there is nothing until they reply! They can’t remove a default without the companies’ permission and I was wrongly informed!!! That’s 3 months they have had.

Starting again fresh and sending my S.A.R however I don’t have my original account number as I shredded all my old phone bills about a year after closing the account, will this matter, can and will they accept my address as enough information to retrieve my account details? Looking back on it this could be why 3UK haven’t replied? Thanks James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest to Experian that as the network has not had the courtesy to explain or confirm the data within 28 days, you require them to remove the data immediately. Failing this you'll complain to the ICO about the retention of misleading data, and reserve the right to take them to court for promulgating misleading information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the Help Buzby, after nagging the CRA they have nagged 3UK to provide information, 3UK have finally responded by saying they have lost my file/paper work and will remove the default (no paper work as there was no debt more like!) Experian have just confirmed over the phone that it will be removed in the next day or two, :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Aaaaaararrgh!!!! Experian confirmed the removal of the default after 3UK told me the default was to be removed, all I had to do was wait for 3UK to update their info with Experian, I waited patiently but had to phone on Friday to chase up why it hadn’t been done yet, again 3UK said yes the default was to be removed, but then at the end of the conversation they said the payment history was to remain?! Phoned Experian to find out what exactly had been sent to them and they confirmed that the status 8 (default) was to be removed as this is what was queried, phoned 3UK again to be told it will be investigated again and it will take a further 28 days!! Phoned Experian back just to confirm, they agreed that the default was to be removed, 3UK have now said that the default was the amount and this now shows as settled, the payment history is totally different! Bum back to square one with them, my file was updated by them on Friday and my status 8 still shows. Gutted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm more concerned that they didn't remove the original default, but made it 'satisfied'. Experience has shown that these carry the same weight of damnation, so I think they're trying to be weasel-like in their dealings with you. (The payment record is a different issue). I'd pursue them that the removal of a default was agreed, and their action does not amount to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continuing my phone assault on 3 this morning as Experian have given me the name and direct line to the person who sent them the correspondence, however do you think I should hassle Experian to change the information as they do have the proof that it was intended to be removed by 3UK and have confirmed this on 3 separate occasions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...