Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case  when he penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unknown thousands in my bank!!!!


kaileo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This may clear things up a little.

 

2. - (1) After section 24 of the Theft Act 1968 insert-

"Dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit. 24A. - (1) A person is guilty of an offence if-

amdt-col.gif

  • (a) a wrongful credit has been made to an account kept by him or in respect of which he has any right or interest;

  • (b) he knows or believes that the credit is wrongful; and

  • © he dishonestly fails to take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to secure that the credit is cancelled.

(2) References to a credit are to a credit of an amount of money.

 

Theft (Amendment) Act 1996

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Stick it in a savings a/c and leave it for a while. Also keep any records you have of your enquiry re it, and banks 'assurance' it was correctly in your a/c. My guess is ......it will be tracked down eventually and u don't want it to cause you probs.

 

Resist the idea re teensy weensy..... tempting tho it may be.

 

best of luck.

 

Lel

 

If its still there next year - remember I'm your best friend!!! lol!

2006 RatNest - Personal a/c:

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £7,000

 

2006 RatNest - Ltd Co a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £8,000

 

2006 RatNest - Hub's a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim,Sept Settled in full £1,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree to both the above posts, but the OP HAS reported the money as not hers, the bank have washed their hands, so what happens if no one claims the money??

 

Matt

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely - Lord Acton.

 

Advice offered by MattyH is without predjudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt. Please research any information I have offered, as I will not be held liable for any incorrect advice i've given you.

 

<--------- If my advice has helped, please tip my scales. 8)

 

For Further advice come into the Chat Room: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/chat/flashchat.php

FAQ's : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Step By Step Instructions ; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

If the bank don't take it and give it back where it came from or where it was meant to go, how long before it legally becomes yours?

Surely no-one could be expected to keep that kind of money in their account, and not spend it, forever?

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, the thing that would worry me a bit is the money laundering laws ,if a large amount of money goes into an account that normaly would not bells start ringing i had a friend that got compensated for a bike accident and when the cash went in the bank froze the account until it was traced(or so he said) also my suspitious mind makes me think of those nigerian scams, also if the inland revenue were to find out about it ,more stress!!,dont want a tax demand on it then the owner wants his money back,,dont want to worry anyone but worst case senarios !!

 

 

jezzy

R.B.S Mastercard £7,189.00 written off default removed

NatWest Goldcard

Natwest business account

Natwest joint personal

B&Q Trade account

Debenhams store card

leeds mortgage

Nationwide

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

IF YOU HAVE FOUND MY ADVICE HELPFULL PLEASE CLICK ON MY SCALES, ALL ADVICE IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH AND IS MY OPINION ONLY

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the info!! do i ask for all transfer details or can i just ask for all the records for the two transactions in question? would there be a charge for this?:???:

In my day, you could / would get a A4 sized record of the transaction with all this information on it. We used to handwrite this and post it to the customer on the same day the credit arrived (the source of the info was from a print out received from head office).

 

Nattie would be best placed to advise how it all works now.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 6 years .. remember ;)

 

in answer to what if they don't claim it back.

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may clear things up a little.

 

 

 

Theft (Amendment) Act 1996

so in this instance parts (A) (B) automatically apply as ive already stated. however part © doesn't apply so clearly as i have surely taken reasonable steps in the circumstances by contacting the bank immediately and informing them that i should not have received such payment which they in turn have told me is legitimate. so therefore surely i have not and will not be commiting an offence????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone could have typed in the wrong account number on their internet banking when transferring some money.. thats an expensive mistake!

 

I'm sure the bank(s) will eventually track it down and it'll go from your account again. I'd write to the bank explaining everything, which will then cover you if they start accusing you of theft etc.

 

Matt

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely - Lord Acton.

 

Advice offered by MattyH is without predjudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt. Please research any information I have offered, as I will not be held liable for any incorrect advice i've given you.

 

<--------- If my advice has helped, please tip my scales. 8)

 

For Further advice come into the Chat Room: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/chat/flashchat.php

FAQ's : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Step By Step Instructions ; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in this instance parts (A) (B) automatically apply as ive already stated. however part © doesn't apply so clearly as i have surely taken reasonable steps in the circumstances by contacting the bank immediately and informing them that i should not have received such payment which they in turn have told me is legitimate. so therefore surely i have not and will not be commiting an offence????

 

No what the bank said is that the payment is legitimate , they did not say it was yours or that the person who made the transfer sent it to the right account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

Kalileo- Do you know the source of the credit? what i mean is name of person or organisation that sent the money. Is it an organisation or person? if it is an organisation, then do a google search and find an address and write to them stating you have received x amount and that it had y reference number and ask them to confirm what the money is for. PLEASE guys be careful of your responses on this one. An advice should have been sent advising of the payment, kalileo, was one received?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kalileo- Do you know the source of the credit? what i mean is name of person or organisation that sent the money. Is it an organisation or person? if it is an organisation, then do a google search and find an address and write to them stating you have received x amount and that it had y reference number and ask them to confirm what the money is for. PLEASE guys be careful of your responses on this one. An advice should have been sent advising of the payment, kalileo, was one received?

hi Nattie, all the information i have is what is printed on my statement and a letter received from nasty west as you say advising of the payment which contained the name of some spanish guy, my account details as the recipient, the amount in euros and exchanged to GBP, and thats all!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Surely the bank can trace the money backwards and write to the man concerned asking him to confirm the name and account number?

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the bank can trace the money backwards and write to the man concerned asking him to confirm the name and account number?

Sally x

thats what i thought but all i got from them was that everything was correct and that i could investigate myself should i wish to!!!! where would you go from that?????????:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact your bank and ask them for the address of the remitting bank.

 

Ask them to put the money into a separate deposit account, in the meantime.

 

Write to the Spanish bank, and ask for details of the remitting account i.e. the name of the account holder, or ask them to pass on a letter from you?

 

Seems the decent thing to do?

 

Todge.

 

PS: I hope it's a long-lost rich relative! Good luck!!

"Weasel (n): any person or group that operates in that vast grey area between good ethical behaviour and the sort of activities that might send you to jail".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

Kalileo, do as we have said keep in in a savings account because i am sure within 30 days the money will be taken back. The bank would not have the other person's account number or address of the sender. They can ask the spanish bank to confirm that the account details are correct. I think this is the only thing left. I would keep it in a savings account within the bank for 30 days as i am sure it would be taken back within that timescale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Make sure you get eveything you possibly can in writing from the bank and anything you can't (i.e. phone calls) make detailed notes, name of peson, time, date, questions, outcome.

 

And as Todge says, ask for the name of the bank, name of the man and write to that bank explaining, and enclose a copy for the man for them to foreward.

Photocopy anything you send!

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kalileo, do as we have said keep in in a savings account because i am sure within 30 days the money will be taken back. The bank would not have the other person's account number or address of the sender. They can ask the spanish bank to confirm that the account details are correct. I think this is the only thing left. I would keep it in a savings account within the bank for 30 days as i am sure it would be taken back within that timescale.

i transferred it accross to my reserve account the next day and there it's gonna stay until it gets claimed back!! just don't know what to do SHOULD it still be there in a couple of months

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is money paid under a mistake of fact and whoever paid it to you is entitled to recover it. There is caselaw going back over 160 years, one of the earliest is Kelly v. Solari (1841) 152 E.R. 24 at 26 where Baron Parke stated,

 

"I think that where money is paid to another under the influence of a mistake, that is, upon the supposition that a specific fact is true, which would entitle the other to the money, but which fact is untrue, and the money would not have been paid if it had been known to the payer that it was untrue, an action will lie to recover it back, and it is against conscience to retain it."

 

The law on the recovery of money paid by a banker under a mistake of fact was reviewed by Robert Goff J in the case of Barclays Bank Ltd v. WJ Simms & Cooke (Southern) Ltd & Anor [1980] 1 QB 677.

 

Goff J after a detailed analysis of the law deduced the following principles that:

 

(1) If a person pays money to another under a mistake of fact which causes him to make the payment, he is prima facie entitled to recover it as money paid under a mistake of fact.

 

Now of course, there was never any suggestion that you were going to keep the money, but personally I would not even move it - you know it's not yours and at some point the sender will realise the error and want it back - and they will be perfectly entitled to take it back and if you do move it and earn any interest, they can claim this back too - so what is the point of moving it?

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

I think what Kaileo is concerned about though Hag, is "What if it does not get requested back?"

How long has anyone got to realise the mistake and ask for it back?

And also, it's all very well knowing it's not yours but what should be done with it?

I would not want it in an account I use a lot as I would be bound to spend some of it!

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is money paid under a mistake of fact and whoever paid it to you is entitled to recover it. There is caselaw going back over 160 years, one of the earliest is Kelly v. Solari (1841) 152 E.R. 24 at 26 where Baron Parke stated,

 

"I think that where money is paid to another under the influence of a mistake, that is, upon the supposition that a specific fact is true, which would entitle the other to the money, but which fact is untrue, and the money would not have been paid if it had been known to the payer that it was untrue, an action will lie to recover it back, and it is against conscience to retain it."

 

The law on the recovery of money paid by a banker under a mistake of fact was reviewed by Robert Goff J in the case of Barclays Bank Ltd v. WJ Simms & Cooke (Southern) Ltd & Anor [1980] 1 QB 677.

 

Goff J after a detailed analysis of the law deduced the following principles that:

 

(1) If a person pays money to another under a mistake of fact which causes him to make the payment, he is prima facie entitled to recover it as money paid under a mistake of fact.

 

Now of course, there was never any suggestion that you were going to keep the money, but personally I would not even move it - you know it's not yours and at some point the sender will realise the error and want it back - and they will be perfectly entitled to take it back and if you do move it and earn any interest, they can claim this back too - so what is the point of moving it?

one major point to moving it TEMPTATION!!! if it just sits in my current account unless you are beyond reproach unlike me then the temptation could be there in my face everytime i use a cashpoint!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

That is was why i suggested it to keep it away from YOUR money and allowing you to know what money is yours and what money is not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...