Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you BankFodder. I will do as you suggest to get everything in writing first and will construct the letter of claim over the weekend. Is it best to use the format for the letter of claim as the one on this website? Lastly, did I read the judgement correctly for the Farooq judgement as its not quite clear to me which act I am covered best by?
    • A letter of claim can't be served by email as per CPR 6.3 unless you've specifically told them. Also can't give you 7 days to pay, they've got to give at least 14 days. They know this, they're just hoping you wet yourself and cough up. This won't be going anywhere. IGNORE.
    • Good Morning, I received a speeding ticket last December, I had requested further information from the ticket office which they provided, I also sent back the form confirming i was the diver at the time, however, i had overlooked the signature at the bottom of the page, nobody from the ticket office got back in touch to mention this and i was trying to book a course with no luck, I got in touch with them and sent them a screenshot showing them I was unable to book the course, they came came back to me and said we have no documents to say you were the driver (they did they just failed to mention I never signed it) they re sent the form and it was over the 120 days, i had mentioned to them previously that the timeframe was coming up and they would need to extend this. They are now saying they have complied legally and i need to accept the 3 points, I am trying to plead my case and I am tempted to let this go to court and provide the evidence of my constant communication on the matter. has anyone got any experience with this? TIA.
    • Thank you. I'm looking into it at the moment.  Straight away it says last sold in 2007. Thank you every one for all your help. It's much appreciated. 
    • Just on bankfodder's final point above. The Title Register you get online for £3 can't legally be used as proof of ownership for the property. Right now they'll suffice to see if there's an asset there. Should you need to use it in court to say he's trading at that address, you'll need to fill out an OC1 form with HM Land Registry to get an official copy in the post, which costs £7.00. Make sure that you get the Title Register, not the Title Plan! Title Register will tell you who owns the property etc while the Title Plan will tell you the property boundaries etc which isn't relevant in this case.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MEOB v Barclays (help please!)


MEOB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Guys, any more feedback before I post my Prelim letter?

 

I'm also looking for the answer to the following questions before I do this so I understand the full implications:

 

Will this claim (approx £7,800) move me out of the small claims/onto fast track?

 

Does that open me up to costs if I loose? Is there a limit on this?

 

I read in another thread that if I am fast track I'm probably better off in

regard to a settlement as the bank can be ordered to disclose their costs at court for fast track, so are more likely to settle. Do I have this right?

 

Can anyone link me to some usefull info relating to Small claims v fast track?

 

Finally, what I would like to do is give the bank authorisation to speak to Mr.MEOB on the phone in regards to this (or full authorisation to talk to them) as he is helping me anyway and is pretty clued up on this stuff, but I don't know what wording to use. Any help/examples of 'aceptable' wordings for this?

 

Sorry to be a pain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my prepared Prelim. letter in (more or less) full.

 

I have edited exact figures etc. to avoid identification of the claim, just in case. I am also offering Barclays 14 days in which to settle at the exact amount for charges plus overdraft interest on charges over the full 12 years. I don't think they will do this, but I want to be able to show the Judge (should it get that far) that I have been willing to settle fairly and amicably from the start of the proceedings. Should I take the 'without prejudice' out? Will that prevent me from showing this to the Judge?

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXXX

 

My request

I am writing to ask you to refund to me the charges which you have levied from my account over the last 12 years.

I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer regulations. If you say that they are not, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put by as a result of my breaches, in order to reassure me that your penalties really do reflect your costs.

Additionally, it has now been confirmed that your particularly high level of penalties are considered to be unfair per se by the OFT who reported on the 5th April 2006 and are therefore presumed to be unlawful in the absence of specific proof to the contrary.

 

In anticipation of your using the Statute of Limitations act as an argument against claims pre-dating 6 years I draw your attention to s.32(1)(b & c) of the Limitation Act 1980.

 

Your responsibilities

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

I consider that your repeated representations that your charges are fair and reasonable are deceptive and that they have deceived me into agreeing to pay them.

Your concealment of the true nature of your charges has prevented me from asserting my right until now.

 

Please note that this letter places the balance of my account in dispute. Please refer to The Banking Code if you are unsure of the implications of this.

 

What I require

I calculate that you have taken £1,9XX.XX plus £2XX.XX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken.

I also contend that that the principle of mutuality, or reciprocity, applies to the banking contract I entered into with Barclays Bank PLC. I therefore claim interest at a rate of 27.57% APR (Your current unauthorised overdraft rate), from the date of each transaction compounded daily. This currently stands at £5,6XX.XX. This Interest will continue to accrue at the daily rate of £1.45 until this outstanding balance is settled.

The current total amount outstanding is £7,8XX.XX as at the date of this letter.

I enclose a schedule of the charges which I am claiming with this letter.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment. If you comply with this deadline then, as a gesture of good will, I am prepared to accept a payment of £2,1XX.XX as full and final settlement in relation to the charges which appear on the enclosed schedule. This offer is made without prejudice and is only valid until close of business (6:00pm) on [Two weeks from date of letter].

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

I am hearing impaired and wear hearing aids. Because of this I find it difficult to communicate by telephone, therefore please ensure your response, and any further correspondence in relation to this matter, are sent in writing by post or email.

For the sake of clarity, I do not wish to receive any telephone communication in relation to this matter.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

MEOB

 

I'm a bit worried that I may be the first Barclays customer to try beyond 6 years with Contractual Interest, and the fact that the claim total is fast track level is adding to my worries. Is there any way I can get a mod to glance at this just to check it all looks OK and I've covered everything I need to at this stage? I just need some reassurance.

 

Some others have entered multiple small claims to avoid fast track. I'm assuming that I can do this even after I send this letter and my LBA (Just in case I get cold feet), although this might alter the total amount of the claims. Any comment on this?

 

Wow, my nerves are kicking in and I haven't even sent it yet!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mate,

You do realise that at this stage you are not entitled to claim for the interest dont you?

 

Interest only gets added when filed at court.

 

just checking!

 

As you are going 6+yrs + CI, you are going to have obstacles, so you dont want to give them MORE to work with.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dar£n,

 

I confess that I was under the impression that CI could be added at this stage. I thought that Statutary Interest shouldn't be added until the court stage (which I am obviously not claiming since I am going for CI).

 

This is what my reading on this site seemed to show. Have I got this wrong? :o

 

See, this is exactly why I wanted an expert like yourself to check this out. Thanks for that - back to the drawing board! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dar£n/All,

 

The post sainty 1 linked to in post 16 of this thread shows CCI being added at Prelim letter stage

 

Also, see post 19, 22 and 40 in this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html?highlight=Contractual+interest

 

Has this info been superseded?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.

 

Yes, that's the plan, with the Bank's standard rate as a first alternative. I'm going to argue (amongst other things) that the Bank has been unfairly enriched by lending my money to others at these rates.

 

Would it be wrong for me to PM bankfodder and ask him to look at this? I don't want to hastle people with minor stuff when they are busy, but I am nervous at asking for 12 years of charges and CCI and using fast track (for the first time with Barclays it would seem), so I want to be sure I get it all right from the start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been reading your thread with interest. Just wanted to post a good luck message in your +6yrs and CI claim. If I can offer any help along the way will try and do so but will keep an eye on your thread and hope all goes well.

 

Karenann

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dar£n - Thanks. I think I have seen this thread (Bong rings a bell!) I will check out the Bong thread again if I can find it and maybe PM her.

 

karenann - Thanks for the support. This stuff is so overwelming that it is nice to know that there is support there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dar£n,

 

Do you mean this thread?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/33005-bong-hsbc-contractual-interest.html

 

I have read with interest. I can't click on bong's name to send a PM, but I have posted asking her to have a look here. With her experience it looks like she could help me out a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Folks.

 

I have had a quick scan of the thread, tell me if I have missed something.

 

Firstly, for your prelim, keep it simple. Don't give away your arguments so soon!

secondly, If you claim £6000, then stick to your guns at this stage. If you are willing to drop £2000 right away, how much further are you going to give? This makes you look desperate IMO.

thirdly.. my opinion of CI is this, I think its OK if you can get it, by all means have a go for it. But do not go to court on that alone, especially since you are now not immune from costs.

 

You add on CI interest at prelim stage... if you are claiming the standard 8% then yes it does only get added at N1/MCOL and not before.

Unfortunatley, Bong has decided to leave us, so you will not be able to contact her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HSBCrusher,

 

Thanks for taking the time to look things over.

 

I take your point about keeping things simple, so I will remove my reference to the Statute of Limitations act and only bring it up once they do, but I think Barclays must be expecting this argument by now!

 

Your point is also taken about the reduced offer. I wanted to show later (if necessary) that I had acted as fairly with my claim as was possible, but I was worried that this might be interpreted as a weakness by Barclays, so I will remove this too.

 

Your third point was my thinking exactly, especially after reading some of the recent wins. If Barclays do pay on everything else I will probably have to settle, but if you don't ask...

 

Thanks again. I'm off to edit my Prelim now, and I will be sending it (special delivery!) first thing on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

OK, I'm printing my spreadsheets out now and have a couple of questions.

 

The spreadsheet I'm using has one page where you enter the charges and overdraft interest and it calculates the total charges and O.D interest on the charges, another page which calculates the s69 Stat. interest, and a final page which calculates the CCI.

 

So, do I send page 1 and 3, or just page 3? Page 3 includes the charges and dates of charges, but no detail/description.

 

Also, while entering my O.D interest I notice that there are times when my balance was positive when the O.D interest was charged. On these occasions the interest paid on penalties remains zero (which can't be right). I appreciate that the spreadsheet can't be 100% accurate since the balance fluctuates so much during the month, so should I just remove these lines from the spreadsheet and ignore them? They look very out of place at the moment.

 

Any help just to clear this up before I send my letter much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.

 

Thanks to Trucker I have sorted the interest problem.

 

Can anyone advise on which bits of my spreadsheet to include with my prelim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trucker,

 

I am claiming for CCI in my prelim, so I guess I need to include the CCI page of the spreadsheet.

 

My question is, is this enough on it's own, or should I include the first page (charges and o.d interest only) too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...