Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've found possibly the most useful document, which explains (amongst many other things) exactly what the OFT's interpretation of a valid agreement is:

 

 

 

So if and when you get your CCA reply, it is so important that you check its validity!

 

The document is here:

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft786a.pdf

 

Sorry if it's been posted before, but it's just SO useful! :D

 

I is confused :eek: this Act is of 1974 S127 regarding non enforcement without both sigs, does this mean the CCA 1983 S127 cancels this out by default, if that is the case when you sign an agreemnet is states the 1974 act and not the 1983 act...

Abbey Settled 3,600:cool:

 

Just started battle with

EGG

Virgin CC

Abbey

MBNA

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I is confused :eek: this Act is of 1974 S127 regarding non enforcement without both sigs, does this mean the CCA 1983 S127 cancels this out by default, if that is the case when you sign an agreemnet is states the 1974 act and not the 1983 act...

 

No

 

1983 only allows them to comply with a CCA request without falling foul of the law but does not apply to enforcing the debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I is confused :eek: this Act is of 1974 S127 regarding non enforcement without both sigs, does this mean the CCA 1983 S127 cancels this out by default, if that is the case when you sign an agreemnet is states the 1974 act and not the 1983 act...

 

Hi

 

I have just read the bank can recreate them

 

How trustworthy is your bank? | Money | The Guardian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MarkieMark,

 

Don't understand this, how can it be enforceable with no signatures?

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MarkieMark,

 

Don't understand this, how can it be enforceable with no signatures?

 

Newborn

 

If you're referring to Paul Walton's claim, it's because the debt was already enforced via a CCJ, so the missing signatures are irrelevant and a request to set Judgment aside because he had a realistic prospect of successfully defending failed.

 

For the full (very, very long) story, see here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/11427-walton-rbos.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The banks try and sell you identity cover, yet they are the ones who lose the credit agreement. I would have thought in the interests of sercurity they would keep proper records of customer accounts. In the media indentity theft is on increase.

 

I have made an application under section 77/78 of the CCA 1976 and they have 12 days and a further month, i think.

 

Failing this I will contact in Information Commissioner Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried for an answer on another thread . Can anyone here help ? If after a summons is recieved you request copies of all the monthly C C statements. Should all statements be available ? And if say one is missing , could you apply for the case to be stuck out ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stapeley I am defending a claim on the basis that 26 statements are missing and as our defence relies on mis-sold PPI to an extent I have asked for the claim to be struck out. I am not sure if one missing statement would have the same effect - in fact I don't yet know if my argument has worked.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

“77A Statements to be provided in relation to fixed-sum credit agreements (1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for fixed-sum credit—

(a) shall, within the period of one year beginning with the day after the day on which the agreement is made, give the debtor a statement under this section; and

(b) after the giving of that statement, shall give the debtor further statements under this section at intervals of not more than one year.

(2) Regulations may make provision about the form and content of statements under this section.

(3) The debtor shall have no liability to pay any sum in connection with the preparation or the giving to him of a statement under this section.

(4) The creditor is not required to give the debtor any statement under this section once the following conditions are satisfied—

(a) that there is no sum payable under the agreement by the debtor; and

(b) that there is no sum which will or may become so payable.

(5) Subsection (6) applies if at a time before the conditions mentioned in subsection (4) are satisfied the creditor fails to give the debtor—

(a) a statement under this section within the period mentioned in subsection (1)(a); or

(b) such a statement within the period of one year beginning with the day after the day on which such a statement was last given to him.

(6) Where this subsection applies in relation to a failure to give a statement under this section to the debtor—

(a) the creditor shall not be entitled to enforce the agreement during the period of non-compliance;

(b) the debtor shall have no liability to pay any sum of interest to the extent calculated by reference to the period of non-compliance or to any part of it; and

© the debtor shall have no liability to pay any default sum which (apart from this paragraph)—

(i) would have become payable during the period of non-compliance; or

(ii) would have become payable after the end of that period in connection with a breach of the agreement which occurs during that period (whether or not the breach continues after the end of that period).

(7) In this section ‘the period of non-compliance’ means, in relation to a failure to give a statement under this section to the debtor, the period which—

(a) begins immediately after the end of the period mentioned in paragraph (a) or (as the case may be) paragraph (b) of subsection (5); and

(b) ends at the end of the day on which the statement is given to the debtor or on which the conditions mentioned in subsection (4) are satisfied, whichever is earlier.

(8) This section does not apply in relation to a non-commercial agreement or to a small agreement.”

7 Further provision relating to statements (1) In section 78 of the 1974 Act (duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement) after subsection

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply Markir Mark , but does this apply to a credit card ? It says fixed sum ,which credit cards are not . Your spending and payments change monthly . So with out monthly statements , your lost .

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi can anybody give me any info on this agreement it was a joint loan,there is apr but no interest rate,also this is supposed to be a true copy but the names have been tampered with too also there is no t+c`s with it this is all i was sent..

 

http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg101/daveym39/new2008147.jpg

 

http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg101/daveym39/new2008145.jpg

 

thanks.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The banks try and sell you identity cover, yet they are the ones who lose the credit agreement. I would have thought in the interests of sercurity they would keep proper records of customer accounts. In the media indentity theft is on increase.

another thing to be very very wary of is when they send you an updated credit card you will find it accompanied by a letter,this usually is to inform you of they have updated their credit terms buy disguising the fact they are saying firstly they have increased your dreti rating and what you can spend with the new credit terms they hope you will agree and when you use the card you have agreed to this new contract,i just read my wife new terms and cut her card up and sent it back all in little peices and also put in the envelope £1.00 along with the cca for the existing agreement,what a shock they got lol

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just bumping this up my list of subscriptions, as similar actions next on my list of "to do's "

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to ask a question about CCA.

 

I need to find out if a credit check was carried out for a career development loan i took out in 2004. I know sometimes they were not carried out. Is there anyway of findin this out. I need real proof of this. was/wasnot carried out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply Markir Mark , but does this apply to a credit card ? It says fixed sum ,which credit cards are not . Your spending and payments change monthly . So with out monthly statements , your lost .

 

 

I would have thought it applies to all contracts burden of proof?

 

Unfair Contract Terms Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999

 

(4) It shall be for any seller or supplier who claims that a term was individually negotiated to show that it was.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to ask a question about CCA.

 

I need to find out if a credit check was carried out for a career development loan i took out in 2004. I know sometimes they were not carried out. Is there anyway of findin this out. I need real proof of this. was/wasnot carried out.

 

Only apply for your credit report if you are NOT avoiding anyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello MM!

 

JonCris is absolutely right.

 

Take care, you must remember that the Credit Reference Agencies (CRA) are all part of the same loathsome Self-Serving Borg banking Backscratching Merry-Go-Round Circus that we all love to hate.

 

Some CRA's own Debt Collecting Agencies (DCA)...or at least that is what I understand to be the case. Either way, these people do not hold Data for our benefit. They hold it for their benefit, i.e. their financial gain, and to pass on any juicy bits to all of their banking Mates and Pals, who plug into this Data like the, er, um...like the Borg!

 

Having a bad Credit Report depends on how you look at it.

 

Someone with a shed load of Cards, a Mortgage, a few Loans, several bits and bobs on HP, but all Paid more or less on time, looks to most people as being the Report belonging to a poor sucker saddled with Debt. To the bankers, it's a Sitting Duck Target for more Finance, so that person will get a high rating.

 

It's very twisted.

 

Indeed, they ought to be called Debt Reference Agencies, as that would be more apt. They call it Credit, we call it Debt.

 

But many people have innocently requested a Credit (Debt) Report, only to find that a week or so later, a DCA pops up on the Scope chasing some long forgotten Debt (real or otherwise).

 

You can guess who logged the Name/Address details when the Report was requested and, when sent, they immediately popped those same details into their Borg Super Computer to see what else these details matched...and then proudly told their Mates over at the DCA.

 

Sadly, if you want Credit (Debt), then these Reports are an issue. So it's often necessary to find out what they say. But, if you don't want to Rock the Applecart, as it were, then think twice about Contacting a CRA...unless you are sure you have no old bones in the Cupboard they may be able to rattle out with some Database shaking!

 

Cheers,

BRW

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Can anyone help

 

I have sent several CCA requests but dont understnd what I do if they dont respond within 12 days? Then what do I do?

 

30days? What does this mean?

Continue to Cliam the Right!:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Can anyone help

 

I have sent several CCA requests but dont understnd what I do if they dont respond within 12 days? Then what do I do?

 

30days? What does this mean?

 

Please give a little more information.

Who have you CCA'd and when?

Did you send it recorded delivery?

 

hsbcfiddled

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...