Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

nat west owe me £37k ***won** 13/04


scott150663
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ALSO LOOK AT THIS PLEASE

 

 

 

In the XXXXXXXXX COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO xxxxxx

BETWEEN

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CLAIMANT

 

AND

 

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC DEFENDANT

 

CPR18 REQUEST

 

REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION

 

 

  • If the defendant fails to apply with the attached CPR18 the claimant will make an application to the court pursuant to part18 S5 for compliance.
  • You are being asked to provide a response to this request in accordance with CPR part 18 within 14 days.
  • In the event that you do not provide an adequate response to this request by the 17th April 2007 then the claimant can apply to the court for an order requiring you to provide the information requested or an order striking out the claim.

Yours Truly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In the event that you do not provide an adequate response to this request by the 17th April 2007 then the claimant can apply to the court for an order requiring you to provide the information requested or an order striking out the claim.

I think you mean defence
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good:). I think c) is the sort of information a disclosure order should be requesting though, rather than a part 18. I'd change c) to below. Then in your disclosure request you can ask specifically as to the actual costs of the mechanisms of the system.

 

Hi Gary

 

would u recomend sending this as my cpr18 request to cobbetts

 

 

 

 

In the CLAIM NO XXXXXXX

BETWEEN

 

XXXXXXXXX CLAIMANT

 

AND

 

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC DEFENDANT

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION

 

 

1. In relation to each and every breach by the Claimant which resulted in a charge being levied as confirmed by the Defendant in its Defence please provide full details (with all relevant supporting documentation) of:

 

 

a) any letters, telephone calls, or incidents of manual intervention into the account in respect of each and every charge claimed by the Claimant in the Particulars of Claim;

 

b) how charges are applied to the account (whether automatically or by some other means) and when;

 

c) if the bank employs or operates any system, either automated or manually operated or otherwise, which is used to assess, audit, track or refine the costs of dealing with current accounts incidents - in particular any delinquency incidents, such as refusal or otherwise of direct debits, referral of cheques for any reason, refusing or permitting any formally agreed overdraft limit to be exceeded or any other delinquency event, such a systems existance is required to be confirmed and named;

 

d) the justifiably objective principles upon which all costs are calculated and result in the specific level of each charge levied by the bank in respect of each of the breaches which resulted in the charges now claimed by the Claimant.

 

2. Of paragraph 7.2.5 of the defence in which the Defendant avers that the charges are applied in return for the provision of a banking service to the Claimant:

 

a) Please identify each and every such service referred to in the defendant’s terms and conditions and identify the charges, by reference to those terms and conditions, that the Claimant is required to pay for each service identified.

 

b) Please confirm what steps are taken by the defendant in providing the alleged services referred to in the defence. Please provide copies of all notes, memoranda, or other information retained by the defendant to demonstrate the provision of the alleged services to the Claimant.

 

c) Please confirm whether charges are applied automatically.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Scott!

 

You have done really well and i encourage you to carry on with your strong attitude! My claim is for a fifth of yours and i have corbetts on my case with Natwest. I have to say i haven't gone to case management i've gone to fast track and my judge has ordered immediate disclosure by the 11th April. Anyway mores to the point it annoys me so much how corbetts deal with everyones case the same. Corbetts make a huge amount of money out of this which is paid by their client natwest, which must ultimately be being paid by the banks customers! This is just a vicious circle, a very nasty one which ought to be stopped because its the innocent Joe Bloggs who tries to earn a decent living who is getting penalised and financially ruined!!!

 

Due you think i should run for parliment ha ha

 

Good luck we are at nearly the sane stage and i'm watching you with interest!

 

von

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol fendy

 

remember cobbetts are doing what they are payed to do,there job is to intimidate the weaker souls and to hope they give up i would suggest alot do give up there claim,but when large numbers help each other as we all do they cant and wont win.

 

stick together and we are in complete control

 

follow the guidelines and we win not cobbetts

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Scott!

 

You have done really well and i encourage you to carry on with your strong attitude! My claim is for a fifth of yours and i have corbetts on my case with Natwest. I have to say i haven't gone to case management i've gone to fast track and my judge has ordered immediate disclosure by the 11th April. Anyway mores to the point it annoys me so much how corbetts deal with everyones case the same. Corbetts make a huge amount of money out of this which is paid by their client natwest, which must ultimately be being paid by the banks customers! This is just a vicious circle, a very nasty one which ought to be stopped because its the innocent Joe Bloggs who tries to earn a decent living who is getting penalised and financially ruined!!!

 

Due you think i should run for parliment ha ha

 

Good luck we are at nearly the sane stage and i'm watching you with interest!

 

von

 

 

well done von

 

you will get payed out b4 disclosure date so get the champers in the fridge... well done

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments guys.....

 

I do have my own thread going cos i hate to take the limelite from Scott.....

 

I was a legal secretary for 10 years so Cobbetts legal jargon doesn't phase me!!!!

 

A good solicitor friend once told me that no one said the law was fair but my thoughts and experience on this was a good solicitor always gave their client the best and honest advice..........i only hope natwest feel they are getting their moneys worth.............

 

Keep going everyone the banks might be the biggest but they are by no means the best!!!!!!!

 

Von

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scott

 

Any news on your case yet? I am frantically as we speak preparing my disclosure list copy typing documents, photocopying statements without the aid of a photocopier and printing copy letters without the aid of a printer with cartridges! Ha Ha oh well i 'll be able to afford all these when natwest pay me out!

 

Ha Ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scott

 

Any news on your case yet? I am frantically as we speak preparing my disclosure list copy typing documents, photocopying statements without the aid of a photocopier and printing copy letters without the aid of a printer with cartridges! Ha Ha oh well i 'll be able to afford all these when natwest pay me out!

 

Ha Ha

 

hi everyone

 

unfortunately no letters ...no phone calls....i assume they will just ignore me until the day b4 my case management conference,so i ll just keep on waiting (im in no hurry)

 

good luck on yours

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

a big thank you to all that have helped a special mention to gary,nattie, fendy,hedgey parky and all the others who have posted info which ive used without there knowledge

 

thanks again

 

 

scott

 

xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my GOD Scott............. are you serious? You've got the full £37K back??? FANTASTIC NEWS............... CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott, WOW!!!! action-smiley-033.gifaction-smiley-033.gifaction-smiley-033.gif FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE. CONGRATULATIONS

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloomin Heck. What An Amount. And What A Well Deserved, Hard Worked For Win. Goooooooo Yaaaaaaaaaaay Scottie. Well Flipping Done Iccle Peepy Man. Brilliant News For The Weekend. I Want To Celebrate For You. Amazing..................... Utterly Fantastic. Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fendy Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Snidy little sods 'eh??? :D

 

Brilliant news though mate........... a well deserved win!!!! Hope you enjoy every penny of it.......... you've definitely earned it after all your hard work. Fantastic news!!!!! xxxx ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mexwave2vi.gifgeb40.gifmexwave2vi.gif

 

Please, please, PLEASE don't forget to fill in the survey to encourage others!!!

 

And if you can, remember this site survives on donations alone. ;-)

 

FANTASTIC news, I think, unless I am very much mistaken, that this makes you the biggest winner of reclaimed charges EVER!!! WOW!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news Scott - very well done!!!!:D

 

I must be honest though, I was expecting a bit more of a scrap than that - I reckon it was your part 18 what dunnit!;)

 

Don't forget to write to the court.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Scott. . . Fantastic news. ..

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...