Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Beckett v Lloyds TSB - Going Back More than 6 Years


TBeckett100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6078 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an account that was closed with Lloyds 5.5 years ago and i settled via the debt agency on a full and final basis (at a discount)

 

I am worried that I may be hauled up in court for writing cheques that would be guaranteed running up a large overdraft?

 

should i leave this well alone?

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You would probably only be able to claim charges on the last 6months of the a/c as the statute of limitations is 6 years.

 

AFAIK your dispute would be with Lloyds for making unlawful charges and the fact you had settled with a different organisation would have no effect on the case.

 

As for writing the cheques leaving you liable for a counter-claim I'm not sure, it would depend on the bank proving that you were fraudulently writing cheques when you knew there were insufficient funds.

 

Hopefully a mod or admin will be able to give you some more information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an account that was closed with Lloyds 5.5 years ago and i settled via the debt agency on a full and final basis (at a discount)

 

I am worried that I may be hauled up in court for writing cheques that would be guaranteed running up a large overdraft?

 

should i leave this well alone?

 

Im in the same position, im going for it anyway if it were not for their excessive charges i would not be put in this position, they are charging me 183 pounds in charges alone next month although my account is still open.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

My a/c was closed with them over 6 years ago however in the 18 months running up to it, i was hammered for hundreds of pounds of charges. anyone advice?

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an account with Nat West which I closed because the bank was unable to follow fairly simple instructions, and was unable to provide specific answers and advice when we needed it. It was closed in 2002.

 

I am in the process of taking Barclays to court, so I'm on a bit of a high and ready to take on all comers.

 

Unusually, I had all of the Nat West bank statements from 1995 to 2002, so I set to and crunched the numbers and sent a letter to Nat West requesting a return of the unlawful charges.

Today, I received a reply from them saying that they would not entertain a claim that is more than 6 years old.

I understand that the banks are not obliged to give me statement copies more than 6 years old, but since I had the information, why can't I claim. Is this a Nat West stall tactic, or does it actually hold water?

Help please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming back charges over 6 years still remains untested. Search engine currently not working, but do a search on 'statute of limitations' and review the threads.

 

I certainly would not make a claim for charges over 6 years solely, if the claim >£5K, due to the potential exposure to the other sides costs if you lost. No costs (or little) exposure if

 

I am claiming back charges going back 10 years or so here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/47207-guido-t-lloyds-tsb.html

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My request for statements last June was ignored so I went into local branch on 22/March and handed them the letter and cheque. I asked for a copy of the letter with a date stamp as evidence of request.

 

It is now nearly 2 weeks later and I have heard nothing. I can feel a case coming on to take them to court for non compliance. My request goes back to 1999.

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello all

 

I gave in my request, cheque and ID showing my address to the bank clerk on 22 March. I got the bank to copy and stamp it so I know they had it and could prove so.

 

We are now day 30 something and nothing, absolutly nothing.

 

I dropped through the same branch a letter on Monday threatening court action for non complaince and absolutly nothing.

 

The account was closed 6 years ago and I wanted statements back to 1998. Can I take Lloyds to court for non compliance?

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that they acknowledged your letter would seem to be adequate proof-it is down to them whether they cash your cheque or not.

 

As they have not provided the requested information them yes go for non compliance.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then they will be making thousands of pounds on charging us for them!

 

Neverless you can get 5 years online, so may be worth most claiming the five years and making another claim should they wish to go further back at a later date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I had a delay in getting my statements and my son had the same. I faxed them a copy of the letter and then they arrived very quickly. The fax number 0121 633 5443. I hope this helps.:)

Claim with Halifax settled at LBA stage.

 

Lloyds Business LBA sent 15/03/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

So thats 1000 requests a day at at least £10 a shot-£110,000

 

That equates to £550,000 a week.

 

And they say that they will need to find other ways of recovering the money that they having to pay back-I think that they have found it already!

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after a long battle I got a call from the branch and my statements were ready. Just to give you all the info, the account was closed Oct 2006 and passed to a Debt Agency. I paid off a % to close the account.

 

I have gone through the charges and they took £1,085 between this period. My first request letter will be hand delivered today. If this goes to MCOL stage they owe another £848 in stat 8% interest!

 

Has anyone succeded in going back this far yet?

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

funny you should ask. I sent my requests via the branch and heard nothing for nearly 40 days. as the deadline approached i sent them strong letters. i got a call out of the blue from the branch manager to collect my statements and they went right back to 1998. from microfiche

i wondered why lloyds didnt bank the £10 cheque until today when i got a letter from the copy statement unit informing me that they dont hold the information requested.

 

confused, I was.

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent .... Well done you

XxXxX

:p

If I have been helpful, PLEASE click the scales

 

 

You may receive differing advice as people have had different experiences. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I offer is done so informally, without prejudice & without liability.

 

 

I WON !!!!

 

 

HERE WE GO AGAIN .... BRING IT ON

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...