Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

yoshi vs Hsbc what do I do next...help


yoshi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Just in the middle of doing my statement of evidence,

 

"re section 21 nooneys says; the claimant has requested that the defendant justify its charges by providing details of the costs incurred as a result of my contractual breaches, including a written request."

 

I have not done this, is this ok to remove from the statement?

 

Thanks Yoshi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, with help from everyone on this site I've finally completed my court bundles:eek: .

Could someone who's been to court please have a look at my list of documents and just confirm that I've covered all the required bases;

DOCUMENTS

Description: Pages

 

Statement of evidence 1-5

Schedule Of Charges 6

Bank Statements 7-29

Correspondence from Claimant 30-49

Correspondence from Defendant 50-60

Relevant Case Law Summary 61-63

Early Day Motion From The House Of Parliament 64

OFT Statement Summary 65-67

Dunlop v New Garage 67-69

UTCCR 1999 70-80

UCTA 1977 80-89

SOGA 1982 90-102

Terms & Conditions 103-150

BBC Commission Conclusion 151

P Mcnamara (ex-Lloyds/tsb) interview transcripts 152-153

CLCV-Australian bank charges report 154-155

Also I can't find out what year We originally became customers of HSBC/Midland ( i think it was 1996/1997) so in my statement of evidence i have not put a date of when i became a customer (IS THIS OK?:? ).

And finally i have used a general template of the HSBC terms (as provided in lats bundle for dummies) and highlighted the clause 7.13. Will the general hsbc terms template be ok?

 

Sorry so many questions but I'm off in the next couple of hours to drop off to the court.

 

Thanks

 

Yoshi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good to me! For the date I just put that I opened the account approximately 10 years ago.

I included T&C's from 98 and 04 just to be sure and highlighted clause 7.13.

You can find the t &c's in here HSBC T&Cs HERE.

Thanks Freakyleaky its just that at this late stage i don't want to balls things up:razz: .

 

Fingers crossed

 

Yoshi

Link to post
Share on other sites

INDEXDescription: Pages:

1. Correspondence 1 - 38

2. Bank Statements 39 - 85

3. Statement Of Evidence 86 - 92

4. Relevant Case Law Summary 93 - 95

5. Early Day Motion From The House 96 - 98

Of Parliament

6. Dunlop v New Garage 99 - 100

7. UTCCR 1999 101 - 112

8. UCTA 1977 112 - 124

9. SOGA 1982 124 - 139

10. OFT Statement Summary 140 - 142

11. List Of Previously Settled Cases 143

12. HSBC Bank PLC Terms and Conditions 144 - 189

13. Latest Schedule Of Charges 190 - 192

 

 

You have alot more in yours so you will have no problem!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well, if I had done it I would have used celotape or string. But as my wonerful other half is a legal secretary she put them into ring binders and made them look super professional!

Just put a cover on the front of the whole thing giving all the relevant details. Name (yours) Name of judge, time and date of hearing, case number, account number.

Ring binders are only a couple of £ from woolies!

Then I just wrpped them as any parcel in brown paper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Freaky, i was in the office at work & the boss was hanging around.

 

The "Court Bundle" was delivered by hand earlier and DG''s copy was sent via 1st class reg post so now we'll have to wait and see. What should i expect? Will I have my day in court, or are dg likely to settle?

 

The CLCV part of the bundle was taken from this site, I'll try to find out and put up a link.

 

Keeping my fingers crossed:rolleyes:

 

Yoshi

Link to post
Share on other sites

YIPEE!!!.....Got a nice a4 envelope in the post this morning from DG saying that they will settle for £1420.20:D :D :D .

There is apart we have to sign saying we won't make anymore claims & about confidentialty (what do i say?) also do i need to inform the courts?

I would like to thanks everyone who's been so helpful in the last 4 months, without your support I would of possibly given up and would be £1400 worse off....SO A HUGE THANKS to all of you who have helped me. Special thanks to Lats, feaky & castlebest.

If I can give anyone any advice it would be that taking a bank to court is a serious issue which takes time & effort. If you follow the excellent advice given on this site and follow all the required instructions by the court you will win. But it does take time & effort but the rewards are soooooo worth it:D .

The only other thing that is interesting re DG's current tactics is that they sent me my offer the very next day my court bundle landed with them. So it seems that they will take you right up to 2 weeks before going to court, Just to test your resolve. Once they have the bundle they roll over & pay up.

Time to start claiming again!!!!

Yoshi:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Done Yoshi you Winner !!!!

 

Freaky has a nice acceptance letter which a lot of people have used or just cross out the confidentialty bit, the not claiming bit is nither here nor there because your offer should be for a specific period and I would hope you got all your money back for this period.

 

Wait untill you have the money and just drop a line to the court saying claim number xxxxx has been amicably settled and you wish to drop the court proceedings.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

this isn't freaky's letter - he stole it from me -

and i stole it from michael browne

and heaven only know where he got it!!!!!! lol

it's been around - bit like pete!

 

 

 

here goes:

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

and many, many congratulations yoshi - you worked hard for this. well deserved - enjoy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to get the letter gone in 1st class post this morning (recorded delivery) so i put a line through the confidentialty bit as well also the no more claims bit. Also i added that they could contact the court about the case being settled upon me recieving the money.

 

Perhaps i Should i of waited for Lats letter, but we need the money in the account asap:shock: . I hope what I've done is ok??

 

Happy daze:cool:

 

Yoshi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...