Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mrs thesergeant v Halifx


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This really is a great site - well done. My wife and I are mulling over the faqs and considering taking action.

 

The one thing that really gets our blood boiling is the 8 days it takes Halifax to process and clear a cheque payment into a basic account. Strangely, it is no where near this long going the other way ???

 

Just another money making [problem] to get money out of us?

 

Are they acting legally? certainly not morally !!

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to the fold ;)

Nemo me impune lacessit!

The hours of folly are measured by the clock; but of wisdom, no clock can measure.

As long as one person lives in darkness, then it seems to be a responsibility to tell other people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-x The Consumers' Association estimates that banks earn around £30m a year from the practice. :-x

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This practice really does annoy me.

 

Is it a fair trading term?

 

The only people this cheque clearance time applies to is those who are only able to open the Banks basic accounts. Therefore those most likley to have some type of financial difficulties.

 

Therefore the banks know that at some point an extended clearance time will present them opportunities to apply penalty charges.

 

What is the OFT doing to stop the banks stealing from us ?

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It takes the banks EXACTLY three days to clear a cheque.

 

do a search on the BACS clearing system.

 

I have had this off the Halifax about taking a longer time with a basic bank account, their feeble excuse was they've had a lot of bounced cheques with basic bank accounts.

 

In my case it took them ten days ( 2 days bank holiday included) to clear a cheque.

 

There really is NO excuse for this

 

regards

 

Mercedes

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no excuse, it is simply organised theft. They know that people whose only option due to their credit scoring, are most likley to need quick access to their money to 'financially' live. By putting in place arbitrary rules to penalise such customers makes it highly likely that they will profit from their charges [problem].

 

I would like to think that the OFT are looking at this aspect of the banks illegal practices as well :-

 

I have added a bit to the MP letter template to include this issue :-

 

 

Dear MP etc .............. >>>

 

 

I am writing to you to ask you to let me know what your views are on the serious problem of unlawful penalty charges which are levied against their customers by the UK High Street Banks.

 

It is a well established rule of Common Law that contractual penalty charges which exceed the actual losses suffered, in this case by the banks when a customer exceeds limits or a direct debit or cheque are returned, are invalid and will not be enforced by the Court. A series of judicial decisions going back over 100 years shows this to be true.

 

More recently, The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 has confirmed that a disproportionate penalty would be an example of an unfair term and that this would therefore be unenforceable at law.

The Director General of the Office of Fair Trading announced in 2005 that any penalty charge which exceeded actual losses was disproportionate.

 

Yet despite this, the Banks continue to apply these charges, and of course the vast majority of bank customers accept the banks’ authority that these excessive charges are valid and they pay up without a lot of fuss.

It is not possible that the banks do not realise what they are doing?

 

I am also very concerned by the application of extended cheque clearance times. The banks only apply such terms to the basic accounts. These accounts are almost exclusively taken up by people with poor credit ratings and/or in financial difficulties. Applying extended cheque clearance times (typically 7 working days) to people in such difficulties can only be done in the sure knowledge that the bank will be able to apply further penalty charges. It is another money making [problem], targeting the most financially vulnerable.

 

A survey reported this year by the BBC and others, concluded that one in five bank customers suffered from penalty charges in 2005. This is a large proportion of your constituency. Most of these people have incurred penalty charges because they are in difficulty. As I have said the majority of these people are vulnerable and already have difficult lives.

 

The OFT, which is empowered to investigate, shows signs of being reluctant to do so.

 

Many people have taken legal action against the banks. The banks almost never go to court. Fearing a formal judgment against them they bluff and threaten, but eventually settle before the day of the trial. Through the Intenet sites at www.ConsumerActionGroup.co.uk and also at www.BankChargesHell.co.uk I am in touch with many people who are challenging the banks, some of whom are beginning legal actions.

 

The Unlawful Penalty Charge racket is apparently worth £3 billion per year. It is not surprising that they are not anxious to give it up.

 

I would be grateful if you would reply to me and let me know what your views about this are, and what steps you would be prepared to take to bring this scandal to an end.

 

Can you think of any reason why, by their dominant position the UK, banks should hold themselves above the civil rule of law?

 

Thank you for your time.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

I am certainly going to encourage as many people as possible to send such letters to MP's and the OFT.

 

 

 

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am certainly going to encourage as many people as possible to send such letters to MP's and the OFT.

 

:) Will certainly send it to our MP

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a lengthy conversation with halifax over their policy on processing cheques.........I am told "when you write a cheque it is cleared immediately the date it is banked by the corresponding bank".....ie I give a cheque to a school for music fees for my son for £78 2 days before pay day, the school banks it the next day and it clears immediately from my bank, over the odraft and £30 charge......so I challenged them why it is that when I pay a cheque into the bank it takes up to 5 working days to clear into my bank? even when the cheque i receive is from a halifax customer..........they were not able to answer my question........so people my advice is be very aware that the banks do their own thing..........now I will think of something to tell you that we dont already know.

 

Power to the People8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just checked my Halifax internet banking.

 

I paid cheques into my bank on Saturday 6 May 2006.

 

They're due to clear on the 16 May 2006.

 

That's seven bank-working days. NINE DAYS in total!!!!

 

Why shouldn't weekends count either? If you, for example pay a cheque into the bank on a Thursday, what happens over the weekend? Do they have to do some sort of manual input each banking day to make sure the cheque is processed and they can't do this over the weekend?

 

Of course not.

 

I feel a complaint comming on, to the FSA, for what it's worth.

Data Protection Act sent to Barclays Bank 15 May 06.

 

Bank statements received 9 May 06. Owed £610 in charges and £31.96 in interest.

 

Prelim letter sent 15 Jun 06.

 

Letter Before Action sent 26 Jun 06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) letter emailed to Richard Younger-Ross ... will await with interest his reply!

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking on the OFT site, this may be another "unfair contract" issue.

 

We are looking at other banks, I spoke to Nationwide today. The nice call centre staff told me that they process checks within 3 days on all accounts, even the basic one.

 

When I explored their website and brought up the terms and conditions - guess what - at least 5 days for basic account holders.

 

The banks are really making huge profits off of people who are vulnerable and need the small amount of money they have, this tactic only forces people to amass the dishonest penalty charges. They are stealing from the poor to feed their fat cats! :-x

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all,

 

OK so we got up the bottle to begin.

 

A cheque paid into my wifes account, took 7 working days to clear. On day 6 the 'Crapifax' :rolleyes: bounced a Direct Debit for 17.99 and then charged 39.00.

 

We wrote a letter 'telling' then to refund it or we would look into all previous charges made on the account. They didn't take the hint.

 

Therefore DPA form being hand served on the local branch tomorrow morning.

 

Look forward to updating you as this rolls on ..................

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have just received my MP's reply to the letter I sent. Details of which are in an earlier post, it is the same as in the Template with an additional paragraph regarding cheque clearance times etc.

 

 

He has acknowledged that he appreciates the points raised and has written to John Vickers chairman of the Board of the Office of fair Trading, enclosing a copy of my letter. He has asked him for his advice on the points raised.

 

It would be nice to get as many MP's as possible asking the same questions !! :)

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK so here we go ............

 

Have received at last the Data Protection Act statements. I have calculated that they owe us £240.02.

 

However that amount includes £39.00 which is to be taken from the account on or about 10th July - we have received a letter for that charge to be taken.

 

Can I include that in the claim now, or do I wait to send my letter of claim until after that date ??

 

If I send the letter now, can I add on interest charges, furthe charges later, as I serve the LBA letters ??

 

I note that in the Consumer letter of claim there is a section concerning default notices. As I have no idea if they have or intend to as the account is slightly OD and will go further after the next charge I have amended that section (to include it) to read :-

>>>>>>>>>>>

Additionally, if you have entered a default notice or if you intend to enter a default notice against my credit record, this occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you or was the result of impecuniosity caused directly by the taking by you of penalty charges which you had applied unlawfully to my account.

 

In addition to full payment of the sum mentioned above, I require that you remove any current default or desist from any intended default entry upon the register. Please note that mere correction or amendment to any such entry, current or intended is not acceptable.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

Any thoughts? Should I leave this in or not include it, as I do not know if there is or isn't such a default notice. My thoughts were that they may have or may intend to so at least I put them on notice this way ;-)

 

Look forward to any thoughts any of you may have ..............

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so here we go ............

 

Have received at last the Data Protection Act statements. I have calculated that they owe us £240.02.

 

However that amount includes £39.00 which is to be taken from the account on or about 10th July - we have received a letter for that charge to be taken.

 

Can I include that in the claim now, or do I wait to send my letter of claim until after that date ??

 

If I send the letter now, can I add on interest charges, furthe charges later, as I serve the LBA letters ??

 

I note that in the Consumer letter of claim there is a section concerning default notices. As I have no idea if they have or intend to as the account is slightly OD and will go further after the next charge I have amended that section (to include it) to read :-

>>>>>>>>>>>

Additionally, if you have entered a default notice or if you intend to enter a default notice against my credit record, this occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you or was the result of impecuniosity caused directly by the taking by you of penalty charges which you had applied unlawfully to my account.

 

In addition to full payment of the sum mentioned above, I require that you remove any current default or desist from any intended default entry upon the register. Please note that mere correction or amendment to any such entry, current or intended is not acceptable.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

Any thoughts? Should I leave this in or not include it, as I do not know if there is or isn't such a default notice. My thoughts were that they may have or may intend to so at least I put them on notice this way :wink:

 

Look forward to any thoughts any of you may have ..............

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regards to the charge being applied on 10th July, I would include in your letter, you will have further time in which to send them a chaser with more charges etc if need be.

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear all,

 

I am about to complete my and serve my claim against Halifax.

 

What expenses can I claim on top of what they owe me ?

 

Things I was considering were :

£10 Data Protection Act fee

50p per letter

 

Can I claim for a reasonable amount of time ? If so what is a reasonable hourly charge ?

 

I wold appreciate your suggestions ................. :confused:

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been a suggestion that 9.00 ph can be claimed.

 

Its also worth looking at contractual interest.......there has been some success with this,but you are advised to read up about this first.

 

:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I refer to these on the details of claim on moneyclaim, is simply blah blah " and the costs that I have incurred ". I take it I then need to schedule these. Can I claim daily interest on these costs ??

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am asking this as there is nowhere on moneyclaim to detail costs incurred other than the "solicitors costs" box.

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok here is the text......paste it into the mc claim partics and format to 24 lines max

 

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date) to (Date) of (£0.00) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00)

 

You will need to send your charges schedule/spreadsheet that include 8% interest calcs to the defendant and court.

 

Make sure in the sub total you include the total interest then add the court fee (it will calculate for you )

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, but do I seperately state my charges for time/costs/letters etc ?? Also the two dates - is the first date the date at which the contract (bank account opened) began or the date of the first unlawful charge ?

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can list date from first unlawful charge

List your schedule from earliest charges date.

 

Work along column

 

Date of charge

 

In respect of ie U/P chq

 

amount taken

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But how do I include MY costs into this ?

 

Do I add something to the details of claim stating that I am including a charge for stationnary, time and fees (£10 DPA) ?????????

There is no such thing as impossible; only the degree of difficulty required to achieve the desired outcome.

Read through the

FAQ Section.... Use these links :grin:

 

Like what I say show - add to my reputation (click the scales!)

My advice & opinions are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

Halicrap - Full settlement 12/06 £408.34

Crapitol 1 - Settled in Full 27/04/07 £15808-)

All & Pester - Claim served £5695 4/09, Stayed

Woolsnitch mortgage accounts - Claim served £2995 4/09, application to strike out 06/09

Lloybles - No CCA, CPR disclosure notices served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...