Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Few tweaks as the run order was completely messed up and the main point of your defence (reconstituted agreement) pushed to the bottom of the statement.   I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. 1.The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act. 2.  I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. 3. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 4.  I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 5. The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’. The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents. 6. Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 7. Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicitor's is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’ 8. On (insert date) I successfully made application to set a side the judgment. The claim proceeded to allocation, 9. The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. (insert date you did receive the documents) I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’. Remove irrelevant 10.The claimant relies upon and has exhibited a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement. It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HHJ Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’. The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause. 11. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not mislead the court. 12. It is denied I have ever received a default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.The claimant is put to strict proof to evidence from the original creditors internal document software the trigger of said notice.  13.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. 14. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024   Run 3 copies Court /Claimants Sol/File
    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo@Nicky Boyi sent across the agreement earlier in this thread. No mention of financial reward to the MA. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was done on the sly. As I said earlier, the owner of OPS is a convicted criminal, with a very shady reputation around these parts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Firstplus £52k secured loan , paid after house sale but £5k extra charges added? - reclaiming?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1878 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a SAR to FP and got back the results. On checking my pre-application details it shows our joint monthly salary as £2610 and states that our disposable income is £2610! There were no deductions for PAYE, NI or pensions. Also deductions for mortgage payment, credit/loans or similar. Surely when supplying a 2nd mortage or secured loan thsi is the first thing that is deducted? They have this on the pre-application and I have only just spotted it.

Surely this proves that FP were acting irresponsible and not acting in our best interests? Could this possibly be aligned with UTCCR or some other act or regulation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I sent off a SAR to Firstplus plc. They responded with minimal information but when FOS chased them they supplied a whole realm of documentation and well outside the 40 day parameters.

On checking it I noticed that they had not included letters which notified me of increases in the APR. Initially the APR was 8.9% but is now 10.5%. Should they have included these letters in the SAR as it does pertain to the loan? If they should have, I would really like to put another nail in their coffin and would like advice on what I should do next to escalate it. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

After BUMPING your thread I had a closer look, I dont think they have acted irresponsibly a simple mistake took place, did you contact them to point this out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems that Toyota are not complying with my Subject Access Request even though I paid the £10 fee! As I have submitted a defence on my Allocation Questionaire I need the SAR which should also show the outstanding balance which is at least £500 lower than what the claimant has submitted. I also need it to identify various other issues which may or may not help in my defence.

Is there anything further I can do to force the claimant to comply with my SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

We wrote to FP about six months ago and asked for a settlement figure on an outstanding balance of £5700 in Feb 2006 after the sale of our home. They came back with a figure of £7600 although we had paid in excess of £3200 or more since Feb 2006.

We wrote again querying this figure and also how they had calculated the original settlement figure when we sold our home. We also again asked for a new settlement figure. They wrote back and told us that in Feb 2006 they has a used rule 78(?) to do the calculation and it was correct but they did not supply a new settlement figure. The reply took nearly 2 months to reach us.

We wrote again just over two weeks ago requesting a new settlement figure and also requested an up to date statement as in the past 6 years we have only had one statement and that was only because FOS contacted them.

Even though it is an unregulated agreement, shouldn't they be supplying statements at least once a year. If you request a settlement figure aren't they obliged to supply thsi within a reasonable amount fo time as the longer they delay it, the more interest accummalates and under the UTR this is detrimental to the customer.

I really would like to nail FP! Is there anything we can do to expediate this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had an secured loan with Firstplus for £53,000 taken in Oct 2004. We then sold our residence in Feb 2006 and as FP frontloaded the loan and used Rule 78 to do the calcualtion we were left with a debt of £5700 although we had paid something like £6000 off the debt.

FP refused to reduce the length of the contract without a huge penalty resulting in us paying £70 per month. Last year we requested a settlement figure and this was nearly £7400 despite having paid about £3500 off the debt.

As we have only received one statement on the debt since 2006 we did a SAR in 2008 for updated statement. We have not had another statement since. Should they be supplying annual statements?

We wrote to them in June 2010 querying the calculation done in Feb 2006 using Rule 78. We also asked for a current outstandng balance and settlement figure. FP wrote back and stated that they were correct to use Rule 78 in in Feb 2006 but they did not supply an outstanding balance or a settlement as requested.

We wrote again on 7th October requesting outstanding balance and settlement figure and requested they give us a breakdown on how they arrived at these figures. In addition, we asked for an up to date statement showing all payments etc. They have not responded.

We are now considering if it is worth us cancelling our monthly payment to FP with the hope that they will take it to court. In our defecne we are proposingt to use S5 & S6 of the Unfair Terms Consumer Contract regulations as they used Rule 78 for their calculations and front loaded the loan when making the calculation. This is in additon to them increasing the APR every time the BoE increased their rates, however when the BoE lowered their rates FP did not.

What would the consequences of us stopping payment and if the worst came to the worst and the courts ruled against us, we would be able to manage to pay several months arrears as we would have kept this mony aside? By the same token I am on pension credit and my spouse is on ESA and if we lost in court we would request the payment to be reduced to £10 a month!

Somehow I doubt if FP would want this to go to court, but just in case we want to know our chances and the worst scenario..Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, worst case scenario is that you lose and get costs awarded against you which could substantially add to the debt.

 

On the plus side as you're on benefits the court is unlikely to order you to pay £70 a month, it could be as little as £10.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks that is more or less what I was thinnking. I am very tempted to go all the way alsmost as far as the court date and then at the last minute pay the arrears to minimise costs. Obviously I will have to play it by ear as we go along and see how I can use the UTCCR to my best advantage.

I was thinking of sending them a letter stating that as we have had no resposne to our request for a settlement figure or statements and if we do not ehar from them within the next 14 days we have to assume that there is no debt anymore therefore no more paymenst are due.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to work out a early settlement figure for settlement in February 2006 not given by Firstplus plc who used Rule 78. I have the following figures;

 

Date taken out; 01/12/2004

Period of loan; 180 months

Original loan; £53300

APR; 8.9%

Monthly interest rate; 0.716%

Monthly payment; £527.74

 

Things went a bit pear shape towards mid June 2005 and we put the house on the market. Between 01/12/2004 and 20/02/2006 we paid £6280.85 on the loan. On 20/02/2006 a payment of £48411.79 was made making the grand total paid on the loan at that point £54692.64 however as Rule 78 was used we still had a deficit of £5773.64 on 20/02/2006.

 

If the current rule was used, can any one of you math’s geniuses please work out if we would have owed anything on the loan as of 20/02/2006, i.e. a residual mount? The APR remained constant during this period. Is the monthly interest rate correct as another calculation shows it should be 0.713?

 

I plan to challenge FP but I am no accountant and a lot of maths is beyond me especially when it comes to settlement figures. I downloaded a spreadsheet from http://www.creditlaw.co.uk/Refpages/Early%20settlement.htm but not sure if I did everything correct.

 

Thanks for any help that can be offered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By 20/2/2006 you shold have made 14 payments of £527.74 which would have been £7388.36.

 

The closing balance on the loan in that case on the 1 March 2006 would have been £52025.98 (using actuarial rebate using Dualcalc and including the payment due on 1 March). To that you would have to add the arrears of £1107.51 (7388.36 - 6280.85) giving a total owed of £53133.49. You paid £48411.79, leaving a deficit of £4721.70.

 

The actual amount will be a few pounds different as you settled on 20 Feb rather than 1 March but it won't be a lot.

 

I hope that helps.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I will try and get my head around that one. They used Rule78 which left a deficit of £5773. Although we have paid off £3785 we still owe £5003. They refused to reduce the term and send back any overpayments we make. I am hoping that if I use the Unfair Terms regs I can get them to change their stance on the length of the term and also on a long shot get them to modify the Rule 78 settlement figure using DualCalc. Although I wrote to them back in June asking for a settlement figure they never supplied it. I wrote again in Oct and when they did not reply I contacted FOS who then chased them. Got a letter with statement but no settlement figure as they state they need a week to work it out?

I believe that if they cannot supply a settlement figure it si then in dispoute and they cannot enforce it, but the concern is the inetrest as for every £70 I pay they take about £43 in interest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Last year in June 2010 I contacted Firstplus plc by phone and then in writing about a secured loan we have with them and requested settlement figure. They did not supply it despite a reminder phone call. The loan is no longer secured on any property as that was sold but there was a deficit left.

We contacted FOS who suggested we write to Firstplus again. We wrote another letter in October 2010 and got a reply stating that we would receive a settlement figure within 14 days. We still do not have a settlement figure.

Surely Firtsplus are obliged by law to supply a settlement figure? I have tried reading up on the regulations but most is gibberish to me. As `far as we are concerned, we should not be charged any interest from the date of my first letter. We have continued to make the monthly payment but are considering with holding it until they respond however we do nto want a default registered against our names.

Is there anything we can do and what is our situaton regarding inetrest etc as thsi accummaltes every month that they do not supply a settlement figure. Should we stop paying them the monthly payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send Carol Vordaman an email, guilty by association!

Does sound strange that they have not responded, would of thought they would want their money.

Agree not paying installments would get their attention, soon hear from then!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1878 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...