Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Please


Dirty_Dog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope you can help.

I'm just in the process of claiming back my Bank Charges from Lloyds and I've got one main query (apologies if it's been asked before but there are just so many threads).

 

Is it feasible for me to get Lloyds TSB not only to refund the charges (circa £2,300) but also to ammend (not correct) my payment profile to show a clean payment history?

 

In a way I feel I'm being cheeky, after all I incurred the charges for a reason, but then I here about Banks making 6 Billion pound profit per year and it makes me angry.

 

I seem to recall an argument about removing and ammending default charges being mentioned before, so theoretically could I argue the same point about missed payments ude to exorbitant charges? And if so how?

 

Any hints, tips, or feedback welcome.

 

Thanking you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean the removal of a default notice?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

Each payment you make (normally on a monthly basis) for a piece of credit (credit card, loan such forth) is represented by a number when you are credit scored;

0 = On time

1 = 1 Month behind

2 = 2 Months behind

3 = 3 Months behind etc...

 

Would it be feasible to argue that because of the charges levied against me by the Bank I was unable to meet the monthly payment requirements thus making the payments later as the charges got higher?

 

Hence that they should ammend my credit profile to show a clean payment history as oppose to

a NOC (notice of correction which as suggested is a note on your credit profile.

 

Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, you mean like if you get your free Experian Credit File?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you could successfully argue (for example) that because LloydsTSB charged you for missing a direct debit, Capital One should ammend their records because a payment was late.

 

Thats my opinion, anyone else?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree. It would be silly to expect that to happen

 

Maybe I should have been a little clearer.

 

I have a Lloyds bank account, with a lloyds overdraft and a lloyds loan which withdraws the monthly payment direct from the lloyds bank account. For whatever reason I was unable to meet the payments, which resulted in me going further into my overdraft (as Lloyds just kept taking the money), receiving further charges (for exceeding o/draft limit, and furtheron non payment of loan), meaning it took more and more funds to get back on an even keel before the next payment was due.

 

Ultimately I was unable to and the charges just increased and increased.

 

In this situation to you think there would be a fair argument? Is this something that other people are doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion no.

 

I was in the same situation a few years ago, and all I done was cancelled the direct debit for the LloydsTSB loan. I thought well I didn't have the money to meet the payment so why let the direct debit return and get charged aswell.

 

Under the direct debit gaurantee you have the right to cancel it at anytime.

 

Sorry, not having a go, but thats what I think.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...