Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a relatively small amount of outstanding Council Tax which was passed to equita. £150 was the original amount. I am now on Income Support and made an arrangement to pay £20 monthly last year which I kept up until December. I missed that months payment basically due to the cost of xmas. I also had my Income Support reduced for Social Fund deductions. I wrote to equita with a new proposal in January for £6.00 fortnightly and started the payments.

 

Now, from that one missed payment, all hell has broke loose. I've received threatening letters about goods being removed and even Prison Committal.

I sent a letter using template from here, saying I wouldn't let them, asking for breakdown of account etc.

 

Received the breakdown, £150 council tax, £68 bailiff costs. Amount owed £68. So, I've actually paid the original debt and just owe these costs.

I thought that would be the end of the matter, I continue to pay £6 fortnightly till the £68 is cleared. No such luck!

 

This morning, a knock at the door. I opened it becasue I'm expecting a parcel. But, it was a bailiff, came to remove goods. I explained that i have been paying, and, in fact, he had a list of my payments which he went through. He said I didn't pay in December, that's why he's here. And now, all of a sudden, I owe £256!! Where did that come from?!

 

Anyway, I shut the door on him, he mumbled something about 24hours and left a note.

 

I'm sitting here now shaking, not quite knowing where to turn.

I've read everything about what they can and can't do, but a couple of questions to put my mind at rest.

 

Can they take goods in my absence as his note suggests?

How can I get them off my back?

What can I do about the sudden rise in anount owed?

 

Thanks in advance, any advise appreciated.

 

I'll just add, though not relevant to the case, that I'm currently receiving treatment for Severe Depression and this has really put me back.:evil:

Data Protection Act sent 11.07.06

1st offer of £94 received 14.07.07(no thanks)

Statements rec'd 27.07.06 Total charges £591

2nd offer received 04.08.06 £281(refused)

LBA sent 14.08.06

FLBA sent 01.09.06

N1 Papers to Court 11.09.06 £722

Issued 22.09.06, Deemed served 26.09.06

Letter received 27.09.06 Paying in full within 5 days!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop panicing, your not going to prison. you shouldnt even be paying the baliff. if you informed the bailiff tht you are on bennefits then he should pass it straight back to the council. contact your council and tell them whats going on. dont let them fob you off or give you any crap. ask to speak to a manager if they mess you around. inform them that bailiffs arent supposed to be used agaist people on bennefits, tell them that the bailiff is threatenig you with prison ( he has no authority to do this, scare tactic) remind them that council tax recovery charges are set by law (c nationdebtline website) you cant be charged for letters and you can only be charged for two visits. also remind the council that they are liable for the conduct of the bailiffs they employ. dont pay the bailiff any money and dont open your door to him if you dont want to. if he calls again, remind him you are on bennefits and that he should have passed it straight back to council, also remind him that recovery charges are set by law. the council can deduct arrears out of bennefits, i think its about 2.68 a week for council tax arrears. the baliffs charges are not collectable by courts or the council. dont take any grief off them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for that,

I've told them before(equita) in writing that I am in recipt of benefits. They never reply except with more threats. It's incredible what they can get away with. The letter he left this morning basically says he will remove goods in 24hrs whether or not I am at home! And if I don't call, that is deemed as refusal to pay. Ridiculous, I've never refused, I've sent cheques and they have been cashed.

Thank God I didn't let him in. Mind you, I live in a block with an entry system. He gained entry to the block by some other means, presumably via a neighbour, but has not been through MY door. Could he use that to say he's been in my flat?

I shall contact the council as advised.

Data Protection Act sent 11.07.06

1st offer of £94 received 14.07.07(no thanks)

Statements rec'd 27.07.06 Total charges £591

2nd offer received 04.08.06 £281(refused)

LBA sent 14.08.06

FLBA sent 01.09.06

N1 Papers to Court 11.09.06 £722

Issued 22.09.06, Deemed served 26.09.06

Letter received 27.09.06 Paying in full within 5 days!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MizzPiggy

Tevion is right. If you are receiving benefits, you can have the amount deducted from your benefits. Calling your local job centre will have them able to better advise.

 

I hope more people read this post.

 

A broken agreement of any sort with a Bailiff or their company does give them the right to charge a van fee as they are coming to collect and levy on goods on the basis that you have not paid and they are unsure if you will. So it is a legal charge.

 

Appreciated not a welcome charge, but one that is legal, which is why we explain to everyone if you are having a problem one month, try to inform the Bailiff company, if you don't make contact and tell them, they just presume you are defaulting with no intent to pay, and intent to pay is the key.

 

Alison

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, that's not what I have read about the fees. It says ' For one attendance with vehicle with a view to recover goods after the levy has been made'. But, no levy has been made. Besides, it's £200 they've added on, 3 times what I owe! Are you saying I have to accept that charge?

Data Protection Act sent 11.07.06

1st offer of £94 received 14.07.07(no thanks)

Statements rec'd 27.07.06 Total charges £591

2nd offer received 04.08.06 £281(refused)

LBA sent 14.08.06

FLBA sent 01.09.06

N1 Papers to Court 11.09.06 £722

Issued 22.09.06, Deemed served 26.09.06

Letter received 27.09.06 Paying in full within 5 days!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could send them a sar adapt it for your own situation and post it off by recorded delivery fast !!!

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I really have to pay £10 for that info? I could understand it with the bank charges, 6 years worth of statements, but this is much more basic. Don't I have a right to the info without having to pay for it?

I have asked for it, we'll see.

Data Protection Act sent 11.07.06

1st offer of £94 received 14.07.07(no thanks)

Statements rec'd 27.07.06 Total charges £591

2nd offer received 04.08.06 £281(refused)

LBA sent 14.08.06

FLBA sent 01.09.06

N1 Papers to Court 11.09.06 £722

Issued 22.09.06, Deemed served 26.09.06

Letter received 27.09.06 Paying in full within 5 days!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send them this and then claim it back when issuing against them. Trust me they do not want to explain their charges to a district judge !!!

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, that's not what I have read about the fees. It says ' For one attendance with vehicle with a view to recover goods after the levy has been made'. But, no levy has been made. Besides, it's £200 they've added on, 3 times what I owe! Are you saying I have to accept that charge?

 

 

 

no you dont have to accept the charge and gaining entrance to your block is not gaining entrance to your flat, so your goods have not been levied and there is no walking possession order. to be legally valid a walking possession order has to be signed. a bailiff turning up in a car is not the same as turning up in a van to remove goods. if a bailiff did turn up in a van, the costs have to be reasonable. this basicaly means if they charge £100 for the hire of a van but you can hire one in your area for £40, you can argue that the charge is unreasonable. anyway, he cant charge for a vehicle unless he gets in to your property and like i said cars dont count. speak to the council asap and dont pay the bailiff anything.

get the council to pull it back. if your ever in the situation again where the debt has been passed to a bailiff and the council say that you got to pay him and its out of their hands, pay on line to the council. the internet doesnt refuse payments and once the debt is paid to the council thats the end of it, no matter what the bailiff says. if original debt is paid then theres nothing to persue. however, cus you are on bennefits its different.

bailiffs shouldnt be used. get the warrent pulled back.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just an update. I've been in touch with the council and my local councillor. The council have not taken the debt back but the recent fees have been 'waived'. They make it sound like they're doing it out of kindness, but the fees were unlawful anyway. They're happy to leave it with equita, at my current arrangement though the bailiff has been pulled off, without his fees:D

I also have a breakdown of the remaining charges. £22.50 1st Visit, £16.50 2nd Visit and £31.96 for a bounced cheque. Hmm, I did have a bounced cheque on one of my payments for £6.00 last year. But, I feel empowered now, surely I can get that charge dropped as well?

 

thanks all for your advice.

Data Protection Act sent 11.07.06

1st offer of £94 received 14.07.07(no thanks)

Statements rec'd 27.07.06 Total charges £591

2nd offer received 04.08.06 £281(refused)

LBA sent 14.08.06

FLBA sent 01.09.06

N1 Papers to Court 11.09.06 £722

Issued 22.09.06, Deemed served 26.09.06

Letter received 27.09.06 Paying in full within 5 days!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a bailiff did turn up in a van, the costs have to be reasonable. this basicaly means if they charge £100 for the hire of a van but you can hire one in your area for £40, you can argue that the charge is unreasonable.

 

How does anyone know whether they have hired one van - but charged several people (all in the same day) for it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...