Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO services and Cabot finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no you can, people dont generaly have reigions like that...just type in folks names, or groups etc and it will bring them up! well i had a search for hfo employees, however nothing came up unfortunatly! damm!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive had the silly phone calls,but they have not been in contact since the CCA that was on the 27 nov,ive also heard from the Information Commissioners Office YESTERDAY...they want all details regarding MS who have not fully complied with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request and also they have not replied to the CCA so they are both in breach after xmas and on 1 jan 08 they are then upto their necks in it,i have also reported HFO to the HMCE concerning the company they name HFO CAPITAL LIMITED as it is not a limited co (unless they have only just registered),so i suspect a possible case for moneylaundering needs to be investigated

but they are a very unsavoury dca peeps and it is only right to give them as much as i get,,they thought it was a joke phoning several times a day

see who is laughing in the near future lol

patrickq1

 

Think you might find all the relevant authorities may have been tipped the wink;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, the Attorney General may apply for an order against a person who has litigated "habitually and persistently and without any reasonable ground". The precise number of proceedings required to meet the test is not specified in the legislation, but normal cases involve at least five or six vexatious actions. The court will take into account all the surrounding circumstances including the general character of the litigation, the degree of hardship suffered by defendants and the likelihood of the conduct continuing if an order is not obtained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All....

 

Ive been a member of the HFO services club for about a month maybe six weeks or so.....

 

had the card and called them before checking...:( got the "packet".......no calls though :) they picked the wrong person.

 

Sent them a "all coms in writing or else" and a "put up or shut up" letter ages ago......and havent had a reply yet....I feel all lonely and neglected :(

 

rgds to all

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, the Attorney General may apply for an order against a person who has litigated "habitually and persistently and without any reasonable ground". The precise number of proceedings required to meet the test is not specified in the legislation, but normal cases involve at least five or six vexatious actions. The court will take into account all the surrounding circumstances including the general character of the litigation, the degree of hardship suffered by defendants and the likelihood of the conduct continuing if an order is not obtained.

 

Hi Patrick,

 

I thought the AG could only go for a 'vexatous litigant' in the High Court. The county courts have their own powers under the Civil Proceure Rules. There appear to be 3 types of banning order in county court proceedings, the first relates to a particular county court. We know HFO seem to prefer Wandsworth County Court rather than the bulk centre at Northampton. I think a recent post suggested HFO had moved on to Croydon County Court. Could that because Wandsworth had issued a local order against them? Does any know if any complaints have been lodged against HFO?

 

Could the mods start a sub forum just for HFO so we can tell have much havoc they are creating and then take action against them?

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

i already have a complaint lodged against HFO and know they are now under investigation by TS AND ICO ,but i have also asked that MORGAN STANLEY be included as aiding and abetting HFO since i had informed MS about HFO and their practices they ignored this advice and seemed happy with HFO

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same problem with Barclaycard. I have advised them at the highest level about the unscrupulous business practices of HFO and they don't seem to care. Makes me wonder whether the debt has actually been sold as we dont have any documentary evidence, if you see where I'm coming from. Or have they just made me paranoid!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should come as no surprise that Barclaycard give the impression that they don't care about HFO's antics. If they acknowledged that they were not acting correctly they would be admitting that they were jointly responsible, since the OFT Guidance is quite clear that original creditors have thrid-party responsibility for the actions of DCAs used by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patrick I recently went bankrupt but I really wanted to see HFO Services go down more than anything. I am so glad you reported them and please keep us posted about what happens. I have NEVER come across a company like them or Morgan Stanley for that matter because that's what my debt was with, too. I just read an old thread from someone who had them threaten with the police!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And phoning at 11pm at night?!!!! They're vile DISGUSTING PIGS and I honestly wish you all the luck in the world with this. They terrorised me and I had great satisfaction in CHEERILY saying GOODBYE to them forever today. I hated going bankrupt but that by far was the best bit.

 

GOOD LUCK - everyone is behind you! x

Get a life - you only get ONE!

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/

http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/

http://www.cccs.co.uk/

 

BSC No 60

12.12.2007 - 9.54am

**Discharged Friday 12th December 2008**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gem88

Like you I am awaiting some kind of response from HFO. They have filed it with the court, I have sent in my defence and we have both completed the allocation questionnaire for the court. They applied to have four weeks to try and sort it out of court 6/12/06 but to date I have heard nothing from them. I now have no idea what is happening. I was presuming that as the case had been filed, I would have my day in Court and I am still waiting. I have made the court aware that they have no evidence and they are in breach of all the rules. Does anyone know what I should do now.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi onecall,

well im no legal expert however, if they have no evidence(have you requested a cca??) then they cannot enforce the debt on you and you have legal obligation to pay it, as the have no proof that it is yours.

HFO seem to have gone very quite, im wondering if they are maybe being investigated due to so many complaints?

anyone help??

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they have gone quiet i have not heard anything cept to say they are under investigation ,perhaps customs and excise are also looking for using a ficticious name AS IT WOULD BE PART OF THE MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AND DOES REQUIRE THE GOVERMENT DEPT TO ACT AND INVESTIGATE AND SINCE I PUT FORWARD TO THEM ABOUT HFO i have not heard much since i have also sent a letter to MORGAN STANLEY and i am laying the blame on them since they refused to take no action with regards to HFO so all the harrassment i did have i am claiming damages from MORGAN STANLEY SO I AWAIT FURTHER INFO

PATRICKQ1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...