Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GB050573 vs Abbey


gb050573
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently sent off the standard letter asking for a copy of all charges from the last 5 years (essentially from when I opened the account). Like a lot of other users on this forum my bank charges started to escalate as a result of a few bad months which has spiralled out of control, mainly because the charges come off 2 days before my salary date and have been in the region of £200 - £300 per month for some months now. I would have been able to get myself out of the situation fairly easily had it not been for the excessive charges. I called the Indian call centre and did something I almost never do with call centres - lost my temper. That was a few months ago and the woman just could not understand the whole 'vicious circle' situation. I asked her what she would do in a situation where she had to come up with an extra £300 to cover charges when there was nowhere the mone could come from and her answer - she wouldn't occur the charges in the first place. Very helpful. I will keep you posted. I am in Scotland so the situation differs slightly from a court point of view and I will definately be claiming more than £750 so we'll see what happens but I am prepared to take this all the way as I am sick to the back teeth of these people taking my hard earned cash from me and making my already bad situation a million times worse.

G

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gb050573,

 

Don't worry about being in Scotland for going after Abbey. I'm in Fife and am currently sueing Abbey at the Central London County Court (the nearest County Court to their head office). You won't be able to use the moneyclaim website, which you'll see mentioned a lot on this forum, because you need an English address for service, but you can download the necessary forms from the web very easily. The Clerk of Court is very helpful if you need help on the procedures.

 

Central London County Court

13-14 Park Crescent

London, W1N 4HT

Tel: 020 7917 5000

Fax: 020 7917 5014

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info - it's always useful to know there are others in the same boat - I take it you never got any joy from the initial request for your charges to be refunded and that is why you are proceeding with the court case. Does this mean you would have to travel to London if there is a hearing?

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I think it is unlikely that you will ever get them to refund you just by asking. You need to alter the cost/benefit equation for them first. The only reason the they pay up in the face of a court action is that the potential cost to them is far higher than the amount being asked for (i.e. they might set a precedent). The purpose of raising an action is to let them know for sure that you're very serious about wanting your money back, and that they will have to go to court if they don't pay. The cost to your bank, win or lose, of any court action is going to run into thousands of pounds, so they will go a long way to avoid it.

 

I think it is very unlikely that you will have to go to London, but on the other hand, if you do, It will be an interesting experience for you, with little to no financial risk.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make it clear to them in your correspondence that you will ask the court for your reasnable travel expenses if they force you into court and oblige you to travel. Tell then where you ill be travelling from. Put it beyond coubt that they were fully aware.

The if it goes to court and you win, you ask for your travel and you can show the judge your repeated correspondence putting the bank on notice as to your need for travel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello gb050573,

 

Don't worry about being in Scotland for going after Abbey. I'm in Fife and am currently sueing Abbey at the Central London County Court (the nearest County Court to their head office).

 

Are you suing in England because your contract falls under English Law or beacuse the defender is in England? If the contract was made under Scottish law are you using the English laws to sue - i.e go back 6 years instead of 5 in Scotland and max £5k instead of £750 ? Id so, has anyone confirmed that this can be done ? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm suing in England because the Central London County Court is the nearest one to their head office.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm suing in England because the Central London County Court is the nearest one to their head office.

 

Thanks. So are you using 6 years and £5k ? If so this will havew a great deal of imapact on other members who bank with Banks based in England.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim is for less than 5k, and only goes back about 4 years.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I received a letter from the Abbey stating that some of the information I would have to pay extra for as it was on microfiche - I think I have enough anyway to proceed with the claim. They replied outwith the 40 day limit and therefore I have lodged a formal complaint with the Commision. I am still waiting on the information they said was 'being sent under separate cover'...but have recently come across all my old bank statements. Tonight I am going to tot up all the charges and write with a claim.

I'll let you know how it goes.

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I raked through all my paperwork and actually managed to find all the statements I needed so the DPA request was actually unnecessary (although I have reported Abbey to the IC as they failed to meet the 40 day target anyway).

I have now totted up all the charges and they come to £1672 which is actually less than I thought but still a fairly substantial figure for 2-3 years of banking, and one particularly bad period. I sent the template letter on 28 April by recorded (signed for) delivery and am now waiting with baited breath for the next installment. I am figuring based on other peoples experiences that I probably won't get any joy with this first request but am full prepared to take the action to court should this become necessary - if that happens I will post either in the Scotland section or the Litigation section.

It seems from the Litigation section that a number of people have actually got their charges back from Abbey. I would like to extend a huge thanks to those people for giving me the inspiration to keep going with this. I obviously want the money back, but ultimately I hope we win the war and not just all these little battles. #Good luck everyone else who's fighting!

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote my letter before action today and will be sending byrecorded, signed for delivery tomorrow. I sent a request for a refund of £1642 on 28th April and they have responded with a standard (give us 4 weeks to investigate etc etc) letter and a handy leaflet which tells me all about their complaints investigation - funny, my initial request specifically asked them NOT to respond with a standard letter or leaflet. So today I have written the letter before action as I don't feel they have responded positively (and have only just made the 14 day mark anyway).

I will keep you posted but am definately going to take this all the way and will raise 4 separate claims via small claims court (in Scotland) if required.

 

MOD NOTE: THREADS MERGED - PLEASE CAN YOU KEEP TO ONE THREAD

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Demand letter sent 28 Apr 06 for £1642

Fob off letter received from Abbey 11 May 06

LBA sent 12 May 06

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...