Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

robbersway for barclaycard, now sold to lowells


CG7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Lowell seem to be out for anything they can try to get, and seem to think people aren't bright enough to realise when something is hinky. My boyfriend has been having issues with them since last year. They keep trying to claim £155 off him for a phone contract despite the fact that the time they are saying it was from (2004/2005) was after it got cut off. After it got cut off because he lost his job and couldn't pay his bills he paid 3g all the outstanding debt. Now 5 years later this company is trying to get more money. They say he can make monthly debit payments of £40, carefully leaving out when they would stop the money, or he can pay 3 payments of £33.31 or one payment of £77 or £91 (the amount changes depending on who we speak to from there).

 

They send letters looking like they are from solicitors, but aren't from any registered solictor or firm I know of, and I'm a law student so it was easy for me to check. They also go by the name of Red debt collection and flowers debt collection.

 

I last spoke to them because my boyfriend was getting more and more annoyed with them, and I asked basic questions, like why had the debt not been collected back then? The answer I got was that it would have been passed to other companies. Why then, I asked, had they not collected? No answer, instead I got information on a payment plan. Every question I asked was either evaded or I got an answer that was then contradicted. We've already told them to go ahead and take us to court, and if they can prove he owes anything we'll pay. I even asked for the records they are going on, and she said she would get them sent to us, but there has been absolutely nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi westwood91 ask your boyfriend to get in touch with 3g and ask them for proof the bill is paid were your letters from hampton legal if so they are part of lowells they have to prove your boyfriend owes it my guess is it is just a bundle of debt they bought dizzyhead90

Link to post
Share on other sites

we have requested information from both 3g say it was paid and lowell say not, but lowell will not send us any information that they're working from, and when we asked they said that if they do send the information then they can't let him pay less, which is obviously their way of discouraging you from getting what you want.

the latest thing is when we spoke to them they said there had been 5 payments of £50 but then we looked on my boyfriend's credit report and they've not only put a mark on but they're saying he owed £263 and still owes £155, so it doesn't tally up in any way. Why they think we are stupid enough not to check up on these things I don't know. I don't know about everyone else on here but I was reading an article from BBC watchdog and they're under investigation as Red debt collection.

Our latest deadline (we've had about 7 now) is on the 8th of this month, so I'm really looking forward to talking to them again with everything I've read.

The thing I've noticed on these forums is that people are a bit confused about their rights, so I'd like to clarify in case anyone is unsure because I know finding out about these things is a pain. They can't send a bailiff around, the only bailiffs who have the right to take things from your house are ones appointed by a court. For a court to do that you have to have a CCJ, and to get one you will have been to court. Don't let anyone in because if you do you are consenting to them taking things. If you don't they have no legal rights to come in. If they put a mark on your credit report send them a statute barred letter, since the debts they buy are usually now 6 years plus old, meaning that under the Limitation Act 1980 section 5 they are null and void.They will have 28 days to give you all the information or take the mark off. In all instances where people have done this they've done nothing, so the mark has to come off. They sometimes will send you things making it look like a bailiff has been round and missed you, but if you look in the corner it has the M to show it has been through the Royal Mail.

Most importantly, of you doubt you owe money, don;t panic and pay. If you do that then you acknowledge the debt and you will have to pay them back. Hope I didn;t sound preachy, I was reading through things yesterday and it was absolutely absurd the things they've been trying, and I'd hate for someone to lose out just because they didn't have the right information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi westwood91 tell your boyfriend to request written proof of 3g and do not talk to lowell over the phone and do send them the staute barred letter see how you get on as it is mostly bad debt they buy over 6 years old dizzyhead90

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a strange letter today off lowell finance

 

would i like to buy back my account?

 

i was to make a bid to buy back the account just like ebay i think and the winner gets it if your bid is what they had in mind. like a best offer

 

perhaps they want me to admit to the debt, so i have decided to bid nothing and shred it as usual

 

just never seen one like that before has anyone else ?

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a strange letter today off lowell finance

 

would i like to buy back my account?

 

Could you scan the letter and post here. I've never heard of a DCA selling a debt to the debtor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry no its gone through the shredder

 

it was exactly that would i like to buy the account really strange never seen one before, with it was a bid offer sheet and a DD form like i would sign that

 

i think its just away to get you to agree to the debt, if you ask to buy it it must be yours.

 

or am i getting suspicious

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it was a bid situation perhaps we could all bid on each others for a £1 each then they could feel contented they have it off the books

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok well lowell have a pretty poor reputation. In january 2009 watchdog did a bit on lowell, if you google lowell financial watchdog it's the top link. I'd suggest you watch the video and just take the advice there. Any debt over 6 years old is statute exempt anyway so you just need to file to have it set aside by a judge after writing them a statute barred letter, which requests your info in 28 days or they can't claim the debt. Do NOT take just, for instance, a piece of paper claiming cut off fee etc as proof you owe it. There are a lot of forums about them and red debt collection, who are basically the same people. Whatever you do, do not pay them any money without absolute proof that you owe it or you'll have a job and a half getting it back again. Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

sorry i am going to disagree with you all, i had a number of debts and i listened to advice from a number of people on CAG and tried everything to not pay. i then decided to call them and they were fine with me, infact they help me with a managable monthly payment when other debt collectors woulnt. i found the worst thing was to take the advice and try to avoid it, i found them really helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you work for lowells by any chance

 

they are nasty money grabbing parasites who have no legal right to pursue statute barred debt

 

they flaunt the law and the weak

 

i my self have had to fight them and won costs for there errors

 

so i am sorry and i think most will agree with me you are very wrong

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if everyone thought they owed the money lowell is asking for, then no doubt they would pay it. however, lowell offers no proof, and because the debt is from so long ago people don't know whether they owe it or not. if you think we are all wrong tracywak, why not google lowell financial watchdog and watch the top link? even bbc watchdog has investigated them. they try to con people out of their money, and yes, no doubt some people do owe it, but we would hardly all be here on these forums if we didn't think, for good reason, that we do not deserve to be chased by lowell. that would make us all look really stupid, as would paying a debt unnecessarily

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

oh we have success. to quote dear lowell, they are thinking commercially (ie know they will be sued and sued some more by me) and are, without admitting liability (so basically admitting liability) erasing the debt and stopping looking at the debt. not bad given we all supposedly owe the money they are chasing us for is it traceywak? all it took was me being as bitchy as they are :) i wrote them a letter, they looked into everything, and based on the phone calls and letter they have given in mwah haha. would it be wrong to frame the letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you got lucky. I've had a few debts with Lowell and despite trying everything, they didn't clear them. Others who used my letters got more success. I even settled the debts and they still didn't clear them properly (when i reclaimed charges from the bank, Lowell wanted the money because suddenly there was a debt again on accounts i'd settled). They tell the bank there is a balance owing and they tell me they are not chasing. They don't respond to calls and letters, nothing at all. This is on debts settled in April 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i have currently recieved 2 phone calls from lowell 1st one they asked me if i was who i was i wouldnt tell them as they wouldnt tell me who they were they told me to look lowell up on the web and that would explain it they couldnt tell me anythign else unless i completed there security quetions well at that point my brain was rackin fast and realised this is there code for whats my d o b address confirmation etc so i added im not sayin a word untill you tell me your part if u want to know my details then you have to go first ended up stale mate and fone call ended today a bloke cqalled steve called from lowell and said id know what it was about sounded like they were in a car id had a previous call 30seconds before that one i ignored as didnt know number so i think there were 2 in this lowell driven car any advice on what i should say i have read few threads and also printed off to learn my lines as im ready to do battle and if all else fails il do what im good at and im sure they will leave, are they allowed to just turn up. i cant remember having any sort of letter of them what so ever so im in the dark and dont want to start talking if its goin to open up a can of worms i cant close thx also where is the button to start own thread cant see it thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just found out from CreditExpert that Lowell Financial Limited have just done a credit check on me so I should be joining this thread proper soon. Does anyone know if they but the debts or have the ssignment of the debts they chase ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe most are just assigned but they do also buy debts. If you have been chased by other DCA's for a few years, it is more likely a bought debt. From what I have seen with a relatives debt, it was bought by Lowell about 4 years after the default, allowing a couple of years collecton activity before statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

if they tell me to look up on the Web -- I just ask them What's that -- I've never heard such SHOCKED silence at the other end of a phone.

 

As for security If the say it's a busness matter when I ask them what's the call in relation to -- I just say well I don't need any double glazing or house repairs - and I've retired from business a long time ago so I don't think there is any interest in continuing this discussion again EVER and then put the phone down.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...