Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems With Council


ruskorod
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6308 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening all, not sure if i am posting this in the write thread but hear goes, i purchased my property which is a semi and the houses each side are council houses with the recent bad wheather 1 of the fences has blown down and when my neighbour rang the local housing repair and maintenance team up she was told that it is no longer council policy to maintain or replace broken fences, unless its in your front garden and has blown on to the road which must be a bus route, i have rang the council to confirm that the fence is there property an not mine and the lady confirmed this. does any1 have any ideas of where i stand???????? should i just repair the fence and bill the council???????? your help is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult one that, i know that many councils will not repair fencing that does not fall into their criteria, unfortunately this may be one of them, you could put it in writing making a formal complaint but maybe your neighbour is the one to pursue this as they are still council property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you take a look on your County Council website, it should list all the Landlords responsibilities for repairs, and also what the tenants are responsible for.

 

Just had a quick look on my local council website, and it does state that the council are responsible for repairs to boundary walls and fences.

 

I suppose all councils are different though.

 

 

 

Emz:D

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

***If i've helped you in any way, please click on the SCALES to the left and add to my reputation***

 

 

 

Barclays Bank - £2238.33 Settled 02/01/07

Bristol & West - S.A.R sent 12/01/07

 

Read my successful thread

here

 

 

'Money can't buy you happiness, but it does

bring you a more pleasant form of misery'

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as though you've bought the property from the council, so as an owner, you probably have a joint responsibility for the fence. If it is not covered in your deeds, then you'll have to bite the bullet and if you'll benefit from the increased privacy, you'll have to pay for it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If, as appears, the Council admit that it is their fence, then unless it is in your garden that is the end of it.

 

If it is in your garden, then it is a trespass and the council should take action to mitigate this trespass by removing the panel.

 

Unless written into the deeds of a property as a restrictive covenant, there is no obligation whatsoever for a landowner to erect, maintain or repair fences at the boundary - unless not to do so would cause an actionable nuisance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but surely the council has a duty of care towards it tenents (my neighbour ) and also a duty of care towards me and my family. i have checked the deeds to my house and none of the fences are my responsility just the hedges to the side and top of the garden...... I PUT THIS SCENRIO TO THE COUNCIL THAT MY NEIGHBOUR HAD 2 BIG ROTTWEILLER DOGS AND WHAT IF MY KIDS WERE OUT PLAYING IN THE BACK GARDEN AND THERE WERE TO BE SAVAGED BY THESE DOGS. HER REPLY WAS WE CAN SEND SOMEONE ROUND TO MY NEIGHBOURS TO MAKE SURE SHE IS LOOKING AFTER THE DOGS PROPERLY!!!!!!!!!!! HAHA............. you could'nt make it up!! any 1 have any ideas about taking this further like i have said i dont mind repairing the fence if they pay me for it.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - the council has no obligation to fence its property if it chooses not to do so. If a neighbour has dogs that are not under control, then it is he who is at fault for failing to keep them under control. However, as the owner of private property that is surrounded by council tenants, why do you think there is no obligation on you? If you don't want your garden trampled over by passing dogs, then there's notihng preventing you from erecting your own, better 1.8m fence to keep them out. That's the benefit of owning your own property, you get to fix problems when you want to, not when the Council manages to send a work team out. In any event, a fence has TWO sides, you you could find they will want to bill you 50% of the cost (as it also encloses your private garden).

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a very confusing problem has the fence affects my property and my privacy but i cant put a fence or a wall up has it is out off my boundries and on council property. I get on really well with my neighbour and she has got any dogs really i just put that to the council just to call there bluff!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not really that confusing, as you'll not be interfering with the council's missing structure. You just build your own on your property - it doesn;t have to be 1.8m (as ytou like your neighbour) something at elbow-leaning height would do. You'll not be able to force the council to repair the fence, so it will really be up to you to decide to enclose your property, and let the tenants worry about their own security.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticed this thread and seeing as i have worked for the councils a while ago on the maintenance team i felt i should respond. Generally speaking if you are stood in your back garden looking down towards the bottom of the garden, the fence on the left hand side is yours (your deeds will show this for sure, but thats the rule of thumb). Assuming we are talking about the right hand fence, which is your neighbours and the councils property you yourself can hit them with a couple of tacks.

 

If you have kids then you can complain to the council and demand they repair it as an urgent safety issue.

If your neighbour has kids he can do the same !

If either of you has dogs, ditto the above.

The other way is to quote the rule book at them, yes the council and any landlord has a duty of care under the law, to provide habital property.

Definition of habital is ofcourse fit to live in, if its not safe and secure then its not habital.

I would ask your neighbour to send in a letter to head of maintenance and you do the same and you should get someting done.

If not find out who the housing officer for the area is and contact him/her !

 

hope this helps

Dont Rush - Take Your Time - Dont always take me seriously

:p

 

If you feel i have helped you then click

Here, if you feel i have not helped you then click Here, if you want to complain about this go Here, if you would like bank secrets then go Here.

 

MBNA - Case Charges+PPI+CI+LA+Damages+costs

RBS Credit Card - Case Charges+CI+LA+Costs

Barclays - Case Charges+CI+LA+Damages+costs

Halifax - Case Charges+CI+Damages+costs

Online Finance - Case Charge+CI+Damages+costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...