Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your responses.  I feel a little bit better now.  I really got the wind put up me when I read about 'bad character and reprehensible behaviour of non-defendant witnesses' and the press guidelines from the Independent Press Standards Organisation. court-reporting-public.pdf (ipso.co.uk) Reporting Restrictions in the Criminal Courts (July 2023) (judiciary.uk) It's a tricky one because, without going into too much detail, all of the victims are of bad character already, otherwise they never would have met the accused, and I fear that the very much tumultuous relationship I have had with the victim that connects me to this case is going to be broadcast for all to hear. The accused isn't going to be anonymous, his name and even his home address were reported in the national press in the preliminaries.    Thank you.
    • How long is the finance arrangement for and how much has been paid?
    • From their own terms and conditions on the website... https://www.carfinance247.co.uk/terms-and-conditions 6.1 CarFinance247 Limited offers a: 6.1.1  web chat service ("Web Chat"); and 6.1.2  SMS chat service ("SMS Chat"), which, provided your application for finance has been approved and you have created a MyCarFinance247 account in accordance with these Terms, enable you to chat either online or via text message (as applicable) to one of our customer service specialists, without having to make a phone call.
    • I've had a text and email from MCB: "Dear XXXXX Please contact us today. Your payment has not been brought up to date and we would like to discuss your account with you as a matter of urgency. Our telephone number is 02039236888"   " Early investigations confirm you are resident at the above address. Despite this, we have not managed to speak to you about your now, seriously overdue debt.   We are now instructing our external debt collectors to contact you directly in relation to your loan account. If you want to avoid this course of action, contact us today on 0203 923 6888"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax refuse to refund charges after snotty letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

This is my forst post on this forum and I am hoping someone might offer advice on what I do next. My wife was charge £178 in overdraft fees as detailed in the letter I sent them below. I found the sample letter on the internet and duly sent it to the Halifax on 2nd Feb hoping for a successful outcome.

 

Unfortunately, we received a reply from Halifax on 8th Feb stating that under the Terms and Conditions of the account, they were within their right to levy the charges and refused to refund any charges as there had been no error on their part.

 

Having been a good customer of Halifax for many years, you'd have thought this two day slip-up (where the charges levied were THREE TIMES the amont my wife went overdrawn) might have warranted a good-will gensture on their part -but no.

 

My feeling next is that I should follow through on my threat to commence Court proceedings, but I havent a clue A) how to go about this B) what it would cost me if I failed C) should I be considering this as the next step anyway.

 

Any thoughts would be gratefully received.

 

Chris

PS, my letter to them was as follows (was this the right thing to do?)...

 

Halifax plc

PO Box 101

Halifax

HX3 0TA

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Penalty & unfair charges – request for refund for Sort Code xxx, Account yyyy

I am writing to complain about the unfair charges which have been levied on my account. On 23rd January 2006, I was expecting my account to slip into the red. I noted this and immediately transferred £100 from a Barclays account using on-line banking. This payment was debited from the Barclays account on the 25th January but was not credited to the Halifax account until the 27th. I also transferred £50 from another Halifax account on 26th January to play safe. However, in this very short time, 5 debits were made from the Halifax account totaling £173.86 and according to my statement, the maximum my account went into the red was £65.02. Despite my best efforts, due to the timing of payments and debits my account slipped into the red on 25th and 26th January..

I then received three letters from yourself detailing that I was to be charged £30 for each debit (ie £150) plus £28 as an unauthorized overdraft charge. I immediately contacted your telephone banking hotline and was treated indifferently. With my good track record and the length of time I have been with your bank, I fully expected a little more help in this matter. But given the completely cold and unsympathetic treatment I received I now feel it necessary to take this matter further.

I am of the view that your charges represent a penalty and are therefore irrecoverable at common law. In the Scottish case of Castaneda and Others v. Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1904) 12 SLT 498 the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This is also the position in English law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79. Your charges do not reflect any actual or real loss, instead they appear to represent a lucrative profit-making scheme.

On a separate note, your charges appear to represent an unfair term of contract which is contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI. 1999/2083). My account falls within the ambit of Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as I am a consumer. Your charges constitute an unfair penalty under reference to paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2 of the said regulations:

‘Indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair - 1. Terms which have the object of effect of - (e) requiring any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation’.

0n 26 July 2005 the OFT stated that 'a charge is likely to be disproportionately high if it is more than a court would be likely to award if the lender sued the cardholder for breach of contract'. Because your charges include a lucrative profit margin, in addition to actual loss, they are irrecoverable as an unfair term in contract.

I believe that your charges require me to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation for being overdrawn without mutual agreement.

Please refund these charges to my account within the next 7 days, or I will commence court proceedings without any further notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

This is my forst post on this forum and I am hoping someone might offer advice on what I do next. My wife was charge £178 in overdraft fees as detailed in the letter I sent them below. I found the sample letter on the internet and duly sent it to the Halifax on 2nd Feb hoping for a successful outcome.

 

Unfortunately, we received a reply from Halifax on 8th Feb stating that under the Terms and Conditions of the account, they were within their right to levy the charges and refused to refund any charges as there had been no error on their part.

 

Having been a good customer of Halifax for many years, you'd have thought this two day slip-up (where the charges levied were THREE TIMES the amont my wife went overdrawn) might have warranted a good-will gensture on their part -but no.

 

My feeling next is that I should follow through on my threat to commence Court proceedings, but I havent a clue A) how to go about this B) what it would cost me if I failed C) should I be considering this as the next step anyway.

 

Any thoughts would be gratefully received.

 

Chris

PS, my letter to them was as follows (was this the right thing to do?)...

 

Halifax plc

PO Box 101

Halifax

HX3 0TA

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Penalty & unfair charges – request for refund for Sort Code xxx, Account yyyy

I am writing to complain about the unfair charges which have been levied on my account. On 23rd January 2006, I was expecting my account to slip into the red. I noted this and immediately transferred £100 from a Barclays account using on-line banking. This payment was debited from the Barclays account on the 25th January but was not credited to the Halifax account until the 27th. I also transferred £50 from another Halifax account on 26th January to play safe. However, in this very short time, 5 debits were made from the Halifax account totaling £173.86 and according to my statement, the maximum my account went into the red was £65.02. Despite my best efforts, due to the timing of payments and debits my account slipped into the red on 25th and 26th January..

I then received three letters from yourself detailing that I was to be charged £30 for each debit (ie £150) plus £28 as an unauthorized overdraft charge. I immediately contacted your telephone banking hotline and was treated indifferently. With my good track record and the length of time I have been with your bank, I fully expected a little more help in this matter. But given the completely cold and unsympathetic treatment I received I now feel it necessary to take this matter further.

I am of the view that your charges represent a penalty and are therefore irrecoverable at common law. In the Scottish case of Castaneda and Others v. Clydebank Engineering and Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1904) 12 SLT 498 the House of Lords held that a contractual party can only recover damages for actual or liquidated losses incurred from a breach of contract. This is also the position in English law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] AC 79. Your charges do not reflect any actual or real loss, instead they appear to represent a lucrative profit-making scheme.

On a separate note, your charges appear to represent an unfair term of contract which is contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI. 1999/2083). My account falls within the ambit of Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as I am a consumer. Your charges constitute an unfair penalty under reference to paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2 of the said regulations:

‘Indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair - 1. Terms which have the object of effect of - (e) requiring any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation’.

0n 26 July 2005 the OFT stated that 'a charge is likely to be disproportionately high if it is more than a court would be likely to award if the lender sued the cardholder for breach of contract'. Because your charges include a lucrative profit margin, in addition to actual loss, they are irrecoverable as an unfair term in contract.

I believe that your charges require me to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation for being overdrawn without mutual agreement.

Please refund these charges to my account within the next 7 days, or I will commence court proceedings without any further notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the dealine expored sometime ago and you didn't take the action which you promised them. Tsk tsk!

 

You know how much you are going for

Do you want it back?

Then you have to take your action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the dealine expored sometime ago and you didn't take the action which you promised them. Tsk tsk!

 

You know how much you are going for

Do you want it back?

Then you have to take your action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I have a feeling that you need to read aruond the forum

please do so. Start with the FAQs and then come back here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I have a feeling that you need to read aruond the forum

please do so. Start with the FAQs and then come back here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I wrote to the Halifax and had the same letter in response. I then telephoned and asked for the complaint to be reconsidered. It was reconsidered and I then had an offer of half of the amount claimed.

I telephoned again and said this was not enough, I suggested a figure

and within 1 minute this was agreed.

 

No court action was necessary, just a letter and 2 calls. The money has

gone into my bank account as at yesterday. My charges were in total

£1600.00 and I had refunded £1200.00, I possibly could have asked for

more but I am very happy and did not have to go through the stress

of court action.

 

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations:lol:

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...