Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went to sh!t x
    • Massive potentially that payment has been made in some form as accompanying evidence to your financial difficulties.  And yes, but add some more zing to the email if it goes to the CEO - You need to make them understand what they have done. And telling the CEO  / MD of the biz what their actions have done to you - It adds to the complaint weighting.    
    • I have just found an email (and checked and verified it on my MCB account online) and I did make a payment to them, but then obvs didn't after that. Will that make any difference to my case? 
    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thames Credit - letter recieved following CCA request - some advice please


bluecat0208
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Following my CCA request on the 18th December, I received the following letter from Thames Credit on Sat and would be interested on what people think I should do next

 

Dear Madam,

 

We refer to the correspondence regarding the above referenced account

 

In your recent letter you have suggested that the account has nothing to with you and have requested documentary evidence, such as a copy application form.

 

Under the Data Protection Act we are unable to disclose personal details. You claim the account is not yours and we would therefore be in breach of the Data Protection Act if we were to disclose any details of this account to you at this stage.

 

In order that our Frauds Department can investigate the matter please forward a copy of an official document which shows your name, date of birth and signature.

 

On receipt of this we will investigate the matter further and revert back to you.

 

We can confirm that the information has been requested from our client. We do not make a charge for this service and return your postal order for £1

 

Yours faithfully

 

some name I can't read

 

 

It appears that we have reached an impasse as I have no desire to send them any document with my signature on and I feel that they are slightly threatening with their talk of Fraud department investigating

 

Any ideas on what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

These people make me laugh (in desperation) they are perfectly aware that the debt is unenforcable without a copy of the original signed agreement so they attempt to use the law which is protecting you against you.

 

Unless they can provide you with the information you have requested then this debt does not belong to you. Getting the Fraud department involved is just stupid scare tactics do not send them a thing, they should already have it and if not there loss.

The reply is unsatisfactory and as such I would still report them for not providing the information within the required time lines and make sure you tell them that until proven otherwise (ie with the original credit agreement) you do not owe them a penny. State to them very clearly that any Tom, Dick or Harry could write to you saying you owe them money and unless they can show you that you do feck off.

Tell them Data Protection didn't mean a thing when in the first instance they chased you about the debt.

 

These people really do think we are fools. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks - that's what I thought

 

What does annoy me is that they have send me a postal order but not the one I send them and this new postal order is made out to Thames Credit - just what am I meant to do with that - I can't cash it, it is completly useless.

 

I guess that I could just keep it and send it back to them if they chase me about something else

Link to post
Share on other sites

a couple of other things to bear in mind.

 

If they are chasing you for a debt and cannot prove they have the right to do so could constitute harrasment under S40 of the Administration of justice act 1970 if they falsely represents themselves to be authorised in some official capacity to claim or enforcement payment.

 

it would also be a strong argument that their behaviour has been unfair according to the OFT's debt collection guidance (have a read through it, the link is at the top of the page)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have cashed the postal order they have accepted the CCA request. The clock is therefore ticking and their recent response does not comply with the requirements of the act.

 

Once they are in default they are in some trouble and their letter will not get them out of that. If the default continues for a further month they are in even more trouble. At that stage report them to the trading standards of your local council and the OFT. Write to TC and tell them what you have done if you like although personally I wouldn't - water and ducks back spring to mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...