Jump to content


John Holmes v Halifax - SETTLED IN FULL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received a standard computer generated letter in response to my preliminary letter - after it apparantly took 11 days to reach the right department.

They are now in receipt of the letter before action (dated April 24th). Had a phone call Sunday morning 30th (funny this because I was told on the phone some time ago that I had to allow 14 BANKING days for them to comply because no one works on a Sunday!) the caller demanded I pay the £500 excess overdraft imediately with my credit card - I explained that because they have already taken all my money, I don't have any to pay them so they will have to wait until I get my charges back - you can imagine the conversation that followed?

Any way, this extra £500 is a direct result of them continuing to take charges from my account - it runs at about £300 per month now despite us using a credit card all the time- A classic example of spiraling out of control.

The Halifax are going to charge me 26% per month until I settle up.

What would you say is the best course of action?

I'm at the end of my tether. I would have gone under if it wasn't ror this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your timetable - they can add as much as they like, they are only going to have to pay it back in the end. If they keep ringing you send them a letter stating that you are only prepared to deal with the matter in writing, and they must cease phoning you or you will take action under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FAO: Alan

I know I shouldn't post on other people's threads, but can you clarify the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 in layman's terms? I have tried searching on Google but all I can understand is that it has something to do with licencing. I want to be prepared for the phone calls I get as I have just started the ball rolling and I'm sure I'm not the only one who is interested. If there is a post or thread on the boards anywhere which helps, I must have missed it, so my apologies!

 

I doubt that the call centre staff who will be calling will know themselves, but just want to be prepared!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Alan.

 

I have read the thread through and it certainly will help in many other areas of life, not just with banks!!

 

If you haven't read it, John, it will definitely help with your quest. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sent preliminary letter April 1st - no response.

Sent letter before action April 24th - the delay was because I 'phoned them to ask if they had received the Prelim. and apparently it took eleven days to get to them?

'Phone calls started on April 30th demanding I pay back excess - these escalated to three or four calls a day.

Claim issued on May 8th, deemed served on May 14th

Halifax indicated intention to defend all of the £1,889.03 claim on May 17th

After being 'phoned every weekend - their favourite was 0800hrs Sunday morning - I suggested to them that they ask their legal department to investigate the Wireless and Telegraphy Act 1949 as they may be breaking the law "everything we do is perfectly legal I assure you and we will continue to ring you until you pay the money we are asking for......we haven't decided yet how many times a day we will ring."

 

Since then, no more 'phone calls so; THANK YOU FOR POINTING ME IN THAT DIRECTION !

 

At the moment I'm battling with the default notice and their threat to take further action through the Court or Collection Agents. I'm making no progress on the 'phone and my letters are not being answered.

 

Thank you once again for the W&T Act 1949. Any further advice?

 

Presumably I wait untill all this is over before I begin the claim for the other charges that have accrued since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has little to do with the Wireless Telegraphy Act but more to do with Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and possibly the Malicious Communications Act 1988.

 

Harrasment by telephone is illegal - log the calls, phone BT to confirm and then issue a summons. Good Luck.

 

Can I suggest to ALL users of this forum that you do NOT give the banks your phone numbers unless you want it passed round all the other creditors who will think it fair game to call you and harass you as well.

 

Deal in writing - e-mail, fax whatever but keep a paper trail. You are then in Control - not some faceless wonder behind a telephone who is attempting to manipulate your response.

HALIFAX - Settled in FULL - £1654 13/6/2006

NatWest - Prelim sent - £985 16/6/2006: LBA sent 30/6/2006 : Summary Cause issued (Sheriff Court) on 14th July : Waiting for Cobbets!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all the help and encouragement from every body who offered advice. the Halifax have paid in full the £1,889.03 we were asking for.

Their intent to defend the claim in full was filed on May 17th.

They wrote to me on May 23rd and informed me that the money had been paid into the bank account that they had closed.

Since they had demanded we surrender the cheque books and cards in order for them to "resolve" the default, I have written to them to ask that they issue a cheque to me to the value of the court fees. Be aware of this ! They at no time asked how I would like it to be paid. Perhaps I was being naive.

Of course this is all done "without liability" because the cost of defending would have been too much to recover (I wonder how much in coparison to their lavish TV adverts ?)

 

Now on to stage two to recover all the charges incurred while I've been fighting this one. Preliminary letter tomorrow. We'll see if it follows the same course.

 

As Curtis Mayfield would have said (if you can remember him) "Keep on keeping on"

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS

This is great news, well done.

Would you please fill out our survey - HERE

(and don't forget we can only survive if we get donations!! cough cough)

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Wonderful news John! Congratulations on not only getting your money back ... but winning!

:) Go on ... you know you want to click me :)

:lol:don't be like the banks - give a little back :lol:

:D There was a time before CAG but now CAG is here we are the empowered! :D

In progress:

Mechs and Mother (deceased) V Halifax - N1 form filed at Court 9 Aug 06

Advice & opinions of mechs, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

many congratulations

 

it is sooooooooooooooooo exciting.

 

well done

 

 

"we will not we will not be moved!

Halifax preliminary letter sent 17/05/06 charges £2661.00

Bog Standard blah blah blah letter received 22nd May 2006.

received lengthy letter dated 24th May 2006 offering £605 pah!

letter before action sent registered 5th June 2006

letter received in response to lba offering £1801.00 errrrr no ta

court action filed 23rd June 2006

deemed served to bank on25th June 2006

notice of acknowledgement of service has been filed

they intend to defend

7th july received letter PAYING IN FULL!!!

 

10th July cash deposit £112.58

10th July cash deposit £2869.00

:D :D :D :D

 

HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...