Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi @LilMissM   I guess you could call me our resident CIFAS Specialist - Personally have been through all of what you have and now have come out the other side when my marker fell off in May 2023. For a start Monzo may close your account but as I had a Marker for App Fraud (Vodafone ended up making a whole hoohah of the account I had with them) - I was with them and still am from Oct 2017 till today. And not once did they close my account. I actually spoke to a couple of current account providers at the time that I had accounts with - Nationwide and Barclays - Told them what was going on and provided all the evidence to them. They advised they may do so but it was highly unlikely now that they understood why it happened and what I was doing to fight it.    Anyway - On to your marker. MCB is My Community Bank?  I can say to you that on experience that On Monday you can be on top of the world then on Tuesday you whole life changes in a flash of an eye. Suddenly you cant pay your bills, Work isnt feasible and you are left with no other choice but to scrape by.  If this has happened to you, then join the club.  - Why is this important? Well Financial institutions get one whiff of potential fraud and you are guilty without a chance to respond. You found out the hard way   If it sounds like I'm waffling, I'm not - Its important to your issue. They have deemed you guilty by the fact that no payments have been made and potentially entered into a loan agreement knowing looking not to pay (Although thats how it may appear, there will always be factors against that)    First off - Questions - What Category of Marker do you have? If unsure, check my signature for a Credit File Guide which will tell you all you need to know about what Categories apply.  - When did you raise the complaint? They will have 8 weeks to respond. More on this in a mo.  - Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan?   My next suggestions, Send this complaint to the CEOs office - CEOEMAIL.COM Let them make the decision as per the Complaint Procedure. Then if they refuse to remove the marker. take it to the FOS who can force the company to remove it if found in favour.  Some companies do need a slap or 2 once in a while to bring them down a peg. You could be looking at this right now.   
    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Company Car fuel expenses


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

We recently had a tax inspection at my work and it turns out that we have been paid to much for our fuel allowane. The tax said we are only allowed to claim 9p per mile but after working this out even for a diesel it would cost more than 9p a mile at 40 MPG i am currently in a pertol and it work out it costs me 13p per mile which means if i from now on only get 9p i am paying to use my company car for work purposes. Also if the employer wants us to pay for the overpayment we have supposably been given do we have to?

 

 

Thanks

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused about this, the Inland Revenue guidelines state that you are allowed to claim tax free 40p per mile for the first 10 000 miles a year and 26p per mile thereafter.

 

Some companies may have alternative schemes based on the size and type of your engine and a company does not have have to pay you as much as the Inland Revenue states but you can then claim the rest via the Inland Revenue yourself. I sounds as though your comany have made some sort of mess of it and I would certainly question any attempt they might make to make you pay it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused about this, the Inland Revenue guidelines state that you are allowed to claim tax free 40p per mile for the first 10 000 miles a year and 26p per mile thereafter.

 

Some companies may have alternative schemes based on the size and type of your engine and a company does not have have to pay you as much as the Inland Revenue states but you can then claim the rest via the Inland Revenue yourself. I sounds as though your comany have made some sort of mess of it and I would certainly question any attempt they might make to make you pay it back.

 

 

Hi

 

Sorry for the confusion i am referring to a car provided by the company not my own car that i use for work purposes which entitles you to 40p

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any car, you are allowed to claim 13p per mile in "mileage allowance". Go to the inland revenue's website; all the regulations are there. However, you are only allowed to reclaim the tax against 13p per mile on PETROL cars, for mileage which your comany DOESN'T pay mileage allowance for. For Diesel cars, this is 9p.

 

So - you drive 150 business miles one day in your petrol company car and submit a travel claim to your company. However, under company rules, they only pay you for 100 of those miles, for whatever reason. (There are several reasons they might do this). They can pay you anything up to 13p per mile for the 100 miles of travel to cover your costs. (My company pay 13p for all cars regardless of fuel).

 

At the end of the year, you write to the inland revenue stating that your company only paid for 100 of your 150 business miles... and you require income tax relief on the remaining 50. If you had been driving a Diesel car, this relief is granted on 9p per mile. As you were driving a petrol car, this relief is granted on 13p per mile - so you will get back 22% of the 13p, per mile, for 50 miles.

 

 

This may take some explaining to your tax office with reference to various documents (available on the revenue website) which I have now lost; I haven't had a company car for over a year. Tax offices don't know about this much because not many people claim it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and P.S. if your company try to enforce these rules you must

  • research the many many documents available on the Revenue website relating to company car travel.
  • write to your company explaining that you believe they have made a mistake and that show that you're entitled to 13p per mile.

Anyway - the revenue can't tell your company how much they can pay in fuel allowance; they can only tell them how much fuel allowance they will get tax relief on... so what your company is saying is that they don't want to pay mileage allowance at 13p per mile because for diesels the tax relief is only given up to 9p... but for petrols it is given up to 13p per mile.

 

Can you tell I got to know these regulations quite well? :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any car, you are allowed to claim 13p per mile in "mileage allowance". Go to the inland revenue's website; all the regulations are there. However, you are only allowed to reclaim the tax against 13p per mile on PETROL cars, for mileage which your comany DOESN'T pay mileage allowance for. For Diesel cars, this is 9p.

 

So - you drive 150 business miles one day in your petrol company car and submit a travel claim to your company. However, under company rules, they only pay you for 100 of those miles, for whatever reason. (There are several reasons they might do this). They can pay you anything up to 13p per mile for the 100 miles of travel to cover your costs. (My company pay 13p for all cars regardless of fuel).

 

At the end of the year, you write to the inland revenue stating that your company only paid for 100 of your 150 business miles... and you require income tax relief on the remaining 50. If you had been driving a Diesel car, this relief is granted on 9p per mile. As you were driving a petrol car, this relief is granted on 13p per mile - so you will get back 22% of the 13p, per mile, for 50 miles.

 

 

This may take some explaining to your tax office with reference to various documents (available on the revenue website) which I have now lost; I haven't had a company car for over a year. Tax offices don't know about this much because not many people claim it.

 

 

Thanks, on more thing the company is saying is that if they do pay us over the 9p per mile for diesel then the tax will see it as a benifit in kind and charge us tax on that. Is this correct.

 

Thanks Again

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is what they're saying; but no, they are not correct in the case of petrol cars. For petrol cars, the benefit in kind threshold is 13p.

 

i see but i will be gettin a diesel car soon and all the others are diesel so basically we will be gettin taxed on something that is actually used for business purposes as 9p per mile does not cover th actual cost of fuel

Link to post
Share on other sites

It always did when I used my company Focus 1.8TDCi... but then I drove it like an old grandmother so that the money DID cover the fuel.

I was getting about 6p/mile I think.

 

 

doesnt seem right this, for us to get 45MPG we would have to be doin alot of motorway driving but i as we do alot of local stuff we are always stopping and starting so to get 45MPG seems impossible. But if its the law then not much i can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...