Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ECP PCN Rental Car - paid by app - no receipt - appeal refused - Mayfair - Achilles Way


Recommended Posts

1 Date of the infringement 17/11/23

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 23/11/23
 

3 Date received 27/11/23
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? Not sure
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y
 

7 Who is the parking company? Euro car parks

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Mayfair - Achilles Way
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA
 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

A bit of a tricky one this.

I'm posting this on behalf of my father/brother.

Father was with a friend who had rented a car and father had paid for the parking.

You can see the call log and the payment taken from the statement attached.

Later the rental company sends my father's friend the ticket they received from ECP.

My brother who's a kid "appeals" it, obviously getting rejected.

Now they think my brother who doesn't even have a license was the driver and are bugging with letters.

I know the first rule is not to appeal but they didn't know and now I'm here seeking your help to clean up this mess.

Thanks

 

 

docs1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an invoice, NOT a fine.

They paid for parking, they have the evidence to back it up, so  ECP will be incredibly uneducated to even attempt to put this through the small claims.

 

As for the hire company, who incorrectly call it a fine, if they have charged the cardholder £68, then reclaim that using the chargeback rules, and send them the evidence that parking was paid for. (A copy of it)

If they continue to whine on, then exhaust their complaints procedure.

  • Like 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bilali,

It's a little confusing...

Did the rental company actually pay the ticket, or just invoice for forwarding the ticket to the hirer?

Has the hirer actually received any communication from ECP about this?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked with paybyphone but they didn't give me a receipt, they claimed they didn't have the record of it.

But the money was taken out, the call was made, and until now no money has been refunded

so safe to assume it's been paid for.

Safe to ignore then I'm guessing? 


the rental company forwarded it to the renter who then sent it to my father/brother.

My brother then appealed it because they had call logs/payment taken from bank account and now they think my brother was the driver.

The last letter was sent on 31/01/24 so safe to assume it wasn't paid. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have ECP ever sent a revised PCN to the renter?

It should also include other documents provided by the rental company.

Also, advise the renter to do a chargeback from the hire company.

They are not allowed to charge for this.

This is NOT a parking fine from any authority. It's a speculative invoice.

(See section 13 of their rental agreement)

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so, after my brother appealed they've been sending him letters instead. 

The only thing I can think of now is that perhaps because it was paid over the phone the registration was given incorrectly?

But what are the chances that location info and bank info is given perfectly but the registration isn't?

In the paragraph in bold on the letter dated 12/12/23 they said they require a VAT receipt and whatnot, how do we get that lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

VAT receipt??PAH!

 

You've got a bank statement clearly showing payment, that is all you need.

Doesn't matter if the VRN was given incorrectly, payment has been made, that trumps everything else.

 

  • Like 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Won't need it. It looks suspiciously like there's been a total screw up with paperwork.

I'm assuming that your brother appealed from the paperwork sent by the rental company?

Could we see his original appeal please?

And again...

1 hour ago, Nicky Boy said:

Have ECP ever sent a revised PCN to the renter?

It should also include other documents provided by the rental company.

We really need to know this.

The reasoning is that the rental company should have informed ECP who the renter was... Which means that they should now be chasing / communicating with the renter, NOT your bro'.

But, whatever you do... don't let ECP know they've screwed up!

How old is your brother?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood, with regards to my brother's appeal he did it via ECP website so he doesn't have a record of it. Ultimately he showed the call log and so on but there's no record of the original appeal form submitted via their website - thinking about it, quite sneaky isn't it?
 

22 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

Have ECP ever sent a revised PCN to the renter?

It should also include other documents provided by the rental company.

With regards to this, as far as I know only the original letter which I've shared. I will ask my dad to ask his friend for the full email as well and share once I receive it.
 

3 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

But, whatever you do don't let ECP know they've screwed up!

Not intending to contact them at all! But my lot are of the type that easily succumbs to fear of fake letters from lawyers and bailiff threats lol

@Bazooka Boo right? What's that all about. They really move like they are some mafia

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

How old is your brother?

If that's too sensitive a question... Is he old enough to hold a driving licence?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks.

I was hoping he was younger, a lot younger... Would have been quite a giggle later on.

The important thing now is to determine whether ECP are chasing the original hirer. He should have got something along the lines of a "notice to hirer" along with other paperwork from the hire company.

Also, get your Dad to impress on him that he should get his "admin" charge back...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ECP PCN Rental Car - paid by app - no receipt - appeal refused - Mayfair - Achilles Way

thread title updated.

i notice those are operator pictures of the car, was a windscreen PCN left on the car?

as BB says, you need to complain to the rental company and point out that this is NOT a Penalty Charge Notice so cannot be a fine!.

they are VERY wrong to label it a FINE and a Penalty Charge Notice!! ID10T's

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk Nothing left on the windshield. Is there any point in responding to the rental company now that the letters are coming in my brother's name? 

Thanks for updating the title, I didn't want to make it too long winded

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are not responding

you are telling them they are WRONG. and complaining .

it wont hurt you in anyway.

sorry but they need a rocket up their exhaust pipe.

not sure id theres also a body or regulatory authority you can report them too.??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I get that. I don't live in the UK anymore and trying to manage this for the family because you guys have helped me out in the past with similar issues. 

Father's friend is a bit of a high-profile person so I feel it'd be too much to ask him to do all of this. If it was me or my family directly... a different story entirely. 

I did, however, get confirmation from my father that the friend didn't pay the "admin" charge they asked him to pay or anything else and hasn't received any other correspondence from the rental company or ECP.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bilali8 said:

I did, however, get confirmation from my father that the friend didn't pay the "admin" charge they asked him to pay or anything else and hasn't received any other correspondence from the rental company or ECP.

In that case, I'd be tempted to simply ignore anything further, UNLESS your bro' gets a letter of/before claim, then come back here.

Await comments from the other regulars.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Green Motion are the RyanAir of the car hire business.  Hire costs are very low but then they try to add on huge fees for next to nothing.  Anyway, as the "admin fee" hasn't been paid, problem solved.  It helps that Green Motion have stupidly referred to the fee as being for forwarding a Penalty Charge Notice/fine whereas in reality it is neither, it is a simple invoice.

ECP will however continue to hassle someone.  Are you comfortable with that person being your brother?

Also, if we can't see the appeal can we at least see ECP's reply to it?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bilal the way PCNs work with Hire companies  is like this.

1 ECP send a Pcn to the hire company.

2. the hire company don't pay the PCN they tell ECP the name and address of the driver plus a copy of the hire agreement with the diver as well as a copy the driver agreeing to be responsible for paying PCNs etc during the hire.

3. ECP should then send a new PCN to the driver as well as copies of everything from the hire company so that the driver is  fully aware of the situation and that they agree they were in charge of the car at the time of the alleged breach.

4. if ECP has not sent all of those documents, the hirer is not obliged to pay. THE HIRER LEGALLY DOES NOT NEED TO PAY. I repeated that to emphasise the situation.

You will have to check with the hirer whether they received all those documents. He [?] should have received at the very least a new PCN. Could you please get a copy of it and any other documents that were received at the same time. Unfortunately it will take time to resolve the matter and various threatening letters will continue. IF as has been usual in the past, all the documents that should have been sent have not all been sent then the hirer is in the clear despite the continued threats. But we do need to know for sure. I apprecaite it may not be easy but knowing that there may be  nothing to pay should help to calm the family.

 I suspect that when your Father paid he entered the wrong registration number  [perhaps his own car number?]

Edited by lookinforinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

safe to ignore

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

More hot air from powerless paper tigers.

Use it for hamster bedding, or to play paper aeroplanes with, or a similar activity of your choice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...