Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Online friend sent money to me to trade on the forex market and lost it now threatening to call police


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

True!

The whatsapp messages state that it was a bet and i said are you going to stick to your word when it came to paying the bet to me and he goes “as long as you trade it for me”

i did agree on that and we agreed on a % split of profit but yeah i get what you mean

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesnt matter it was to do with crypto etc.

its someone impersonating a police officer 

and you have a very good lead as to whom would have arranged it even if it was not him.

the police will not be one bit interested into whats behind why it happened thats immaterial and none of their business, its a civil matter.

now if this was me i'd play the game and get my mate to ring him up and pretend to be another pc investigating a bogus call from someone pretending to be from the police...but im evil like that. he'd pass a brick and it would be a hoot to listen too.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That’d make your friend (& you !) equally guilty of impersonating a police officer / conspiracy to do so.

Far better to have it done by the actual police!

Link to post
Share on other sites

spoilsport....:pound:

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that personal safety measures are considered, if you don't know the person you are dealing with.  What if this online friend is involved in criminal activities.

Presume the online friend does not know your residential address and cannot find it out by using social media ? 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

"if not im sure you know the person whos made this allegation if you can get back the money to them, what ill do ill give u till thursday if not ill be applying for a court warrant and ill see you then"

"is so fake on so many levels it definitely isn't the police.

Police would never say something like that, nor could they apply for a "court warrant" [whatever that is supposed to be] without interviewing you.

I would say it's someone on behalf of your online friend trying to scare you into going to a police station and "turn yourself in".  If the caller had left an actual PC's name I'd say call the police station and ask for them personally. But as they left no name ignore it but keep the recording.

One call may not be a crime against you (although it might be for impersonating a police officer) but if it keeps happening possibly harassment,

so keep a record of all incidents/calls if there are more. In writing, a timed and dated record signed by you with a summary of what happened. Keep recordings of all calls if you can.

If your 'friend' actually reported it to the police they might start asking where he got the money from.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not know my full name just my nickname and do not know my address which i want to keep it that way.

the voicemail was sent on the 3rd feb.

Said it saves for 7 days, i cant download or anything i can record it on another device but not sure if thats helpful?

Or should i definitely go into the station today?

What do i exactly say im sure the police will ask why are you getting these calls etc..

how much of the situation to i tell them etc if they do ask.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is to do nothing. A single call, especially one that did not directly threaten you, is unlikely to be a crime. For something to be the offence of harassment it needs be repeated conduct. Look up The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 online, lots of guidance. Note that in this situation it isn't normally a crime if it's a one-off, it has to be what the Act calls "a course of conduct".  So police are unlikely to be interested at this time.

Important thing is to keep good records for yourself to use as evidence if it continues. If it does become harassment having good quality records of what has happened to use as evidence will be key to getting police/courts involved.

I wouldn't advise reporting the impersonation of a police officer either. Probably too trivial for the police to be interested at this time. More importantly for you if they did start investigating and if they were ever able to track down your 'friend' they might when interviewing him disclose your real name. You don't want that to happen.

If recording the voicemail onto another device is the best you can then do that. It's better than not keeping anything. Or if you can't make a copy at all transcribe it and keep hard copy (signed/dated etc). Also photograph the call details shown on your phone - date, time etc - and print off a hard copy for your records. When you do that sign/initial and date the printed copy yourself. 

Incidentally you say the voicemail named a police station. Is the police station near you? Reason I ask is if your 'friend' doesn't know your address how would he be able to name a police station near you? Or does he know roughly where in England you live, just not the exact address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the ‘friend’ knew roughly the area which is a big area, but not the exact address.

also this person has been messaging other online friends of mine through social media saying

“i know you know him just wanted to make you aware he is in serious trouble with the police, he is under investigation at the moment, he has stolen alot of money from me and is in big trouble.

i just wanted to make you aware so you can protect yourself and if you have any information you’d like to share to stop him that would be so helpful”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably you will respond to them (private message to them individually) saying it is false information, wholly untrue, you have done no such thing and you aren't being investigated by the police? On the message system you use can you send private messages in a way that prevents the recipient forwarding or sharing it?

When you send that reply do it knowing that some of your online friends will forward it to him if they can so don't make defamatory comments about him, just rebut his alleged "facts". I would decline to give any further details - "that's between me and him" - otherwise you risk getting into a pointless message battle of the "I said/"He said" variety. 

And keep hard copy of all the messaging. It's now becoming a 'course of conduct' - harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

film the phone playing the msg with another phone - that will not only record the msg but also show the app playing the voicemail and its date on its screen

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have recorded a video on another phone of the voicemail, you have to call a number to listen to it, it dosent show the date and time of the call, but says it vocally before the voicemail plays, from the automated voicemail message.

Yeah i have messaged the people telling them its untrue etc to the ones who have reached out to me, some of them have removed me but no big deal, didn’t know them personally just though an online game/online friend group. Its what was said that makes people think differently “he has stolen alot of money from me” (it was sent willingly, with no force or no pressure), what was also said to some people they know i play with/talk to online is that i “prey on girls for money”(which i never have ever done!)

”under police investigation, not the only report had about him made to the police” 

no police has contacted me, the last time i was in trouble was for a speeding fine. 

just annoying because people look at you differently.

i have took screenshots of all messages they have been sending to people.


this is crazy! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything i should message this person? Along the lines of 

spreading false information to people such as “i have stolen alot of money from you” is a xxxx

and also who you or got some to impersonate a police officer is a serious crime and will not be taken lightly.

Edited by parkinghelp1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would do nothing.  The more you add to Social Media the more of a problem you may be creating.

I would just stay silent for now, but monitor posts to the social media site.

  • I agree 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...