Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

North West Automobiles Blackburn Ltd - Deposit issues - couldnt get ins so cancelled before we even saw the car - dealership are saying deposit is non refundable.

Telephonic used car purchase: deposit paid: dealer says holding deposit: dealer says distance rules don't apply because no online purchase "scheme": claim issued defended DQ

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

when DSR was rolled into CRA 2015, was it not updated/amended, i thought it was?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref: Post #25. Nothing signed at all. Based largely on the fact that we didn't see or speak to anyone in person other than to say to cancel the sale.

 

Redacted receipt attached.

I need to find the email that accompanied the attached receipt, I will chase my son as I only saved the receipt in our files but I do recall notes on the body of the email around forfeit of deposit....

NorthWestAutos Receipt.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the receipt. It is very useful.

In terms of the email – not a good time to start losing correspondence on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of your overall chance of success, I rate it is extremely high – better than 90%.

When the directions questionnaire arrives, you will have an opportunity to choose mediation. It will be interesting to see whether they are prepared to mediate – but our preference on this website is that you decline mediation and you go to trial. I think it will be very useful to obtain a judgement against them which undermines the position and provides help and encouragement for other people who are facing the same difficulty with this company – and maybe with others.

However, you may prefer to try mediation in order to get your money as quickly as possible. If it went to trial then the outcome would be delayed although in our view, the victory would be very worthwhile.

You will have to decide.
We would prefer that you decline mediation

 

Also, in small claims cases litigant in person costs are not available even to the winner saving very exceptional circumstances.
There are elements to this case which make me feel that it might be worth asking the judge to make a discretionary order in relation to your litigant in person costs.
There is no downside to this but of course it would have to go to trial for this to happen.
A judge might be moved to exercise discretion on this point if they felt that the defendant had behaved unreasonably in their litigation

I would suggest very strongly that you start keeping a detailed log of all the time you have spent preparing the case including learning.

Do it retrospectively from the time you came to this forum and try to keep a good spreadsheet so that if you do ask for the judge to exercise discretion and award you litigant in person costs then you have good detailed evidence to support the figure you come up with so that the judge is reassured that it is not simply a money grab.
Litigant in person costs are currently about £18 per hour. Once again, awarded only very exceptionally in small claims cases – but it may be worth trying your luck in this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course is not certain that you will go to trial – but in any event, your time won't be wasted if you make a court familiarisation visit.

You have quite a bit of time in hand so I suggest that you make two or three visits on different days. This will help you enormously when your Big Day arrives.

Follow the court familiarisation guide link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning. 

 

 

In terms of the DQ, it looks straight forward – I hope.

A - Yes to Mediation ()

B - Address

C – Yes to small claims

D – Suitability without a hearing, I presume that this is a no? That's correct

E – Location of our choice, it would be Chester. As the claimant is a private individual and the defendant is a well resourced business

E2 – Expert advice – No.

E3 – Witness? I’m not sure I do have my son’s supervisor who verbally confirmed the deposit and I did that same when we entered their premises in person to cancel? Not sure on this one. Probably not needed – although get a witness statement which we would like to see please

E4 – no noted dates that do not work for us.

I trust we must also provide a copy to the defendant at their business address. It is worthwhile sending both copies via signed for delivery?

 

Edited by BankFodder
edits in red
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it goes beyond mediation then you should get a witness statement from the supervisor.

A witness statement would take the following form:
 

Quote

my name is blah blah blah
my address is blah blah blah
my profession is blah blah blah
in respect of the claimant I perform blah blah blah role
on XXX date I was with the claimant when he blah blah blah blah, I heard blah blah blah blah

Any other details

I'm prepared to give evidence in court if necessary

Statement of truth

Signed

Date

head it up – name of County Court, case number, name of case, statement of blah blah blah for the claimant.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon,

Update after some contact from NW Autos today and general.

Our DQ was posted in time via signed for to the court with a copy with proof of postage to the garage. We have not had sight of their DQ yet.

My son let a few calls from the garage go to voicemail today with a message being left along the lines of returning their call to discuss the court case. No call has been or will be returned.

Then the garage followed up with via email as attached to this update.

Thanks again.

NW Auto Email 21.09.23.pdf

Edited by dekd123
typo
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. They are obviously worried.

Once again, your chances of success if it goes to trial are extremely high – much better than 95%.

I see that you claim interest.

Have you been put to any other expense when dealing with this. For instance, did you have to use petrol going to visit them or anything else?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could with confidence say yes to something to try to recover but it's been time more than anything - educating myself / son with the help here but no real financial expense or outlay. The fact that the garage held the deposit was the hardest blow as it's a lot of money for my son and it delayed his purchase of a car until I could step in to loan the money and I'm not quite sure how I would quantify that.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay well you are claiming interest anyway – and 8% per annum, that is pretty good.

It's up to you – but I think they are on the run – and even if they weren't, if it goes to trial I think you can be confident of victory. Not only that, they will be shown up for what they are.
Furthermore, even if it was relevant that distance selling has to be part of an organised scheme – their claim that they don't do an organised scheme is clearly a load of rubbish. Their website shows very clearly that it is a scheme.

That means that their statement of truth is unreliable at the very best and the attention of the court should be brought to it.

I can imagine that they are probably keen for this to be quietly put away so that the attention of the court is not brought to it and also that there is minimal publicity.

 

Quote

Dear Ali or Kamran Ilyas, whatever your name is,

Thank you for your email dated blah blah blah.

The answer is No.

I'm not prepared to compromise on a single penny – including interest and costs.
You haven't filed your directions questionnaire yet so you had better bear this in mind if you decide you want to go to mediation. I won't be giving any ground.

I'm telling you that now and I will tell the mediator if that's where we are going.

And of course I will also tell the judge.

And incidentally – stop phoning me please. Everything in writing.
 

Believe me

Signed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just made a slight amendment in red to my suggested letter above

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, please let us know if and when you get a copy of their directions questionnaire.

I suggest that if you don't get it in a week or so that you start telephoning the court to find out whether they have filed one, to ask what it says and to get a copy.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do and thank you. I know that our date to submit the DQ was the 22nd.

DQ received today via email with a Courtesy Copy to what appears to be a legal representative.

 Email from NW Auto with DQ.pdf

I missed a page from the post above - all pages of the DQ were individual so had to combine and duplicated one page. I can't seem to edit the above.

NW Autos DQ - Received 22.9.23 via email.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do we delete both of them or just one of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post #41 has the incorrect DQ so can be deleted. The other attachment on post 41 was the email that was received with the DQ and was uploaded only to highlight the copied in legal representative who is here -

Apologies for the mishap.

Edited by dekd123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Please update us when you get the date for the mediation.

That your son know that although they will try to bully him, he won't be talking directly to the other side. It will be a mediator who will be courteous and professional – although they may try to put a little pressure on to compromise but he should be prepared to resist that. He has right completely on his side and there's no reason why any money should be sacrificed to these people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. We are trying to arrange the familiarisation court visit. The offer made by garage has motivated my son, galvanised things almost, so I think we will be preparing for his day in court.

I will keep the post updated.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure the familiarisation visit will be very useful and also quite surprising at the small claims level.

I'm sure you can get in there together for the first one and then may be on the second one it would do his confidence some good if he does one on his own.
If there are a couple of different courts within reach – then go to both to appreciate may be different layouts, different styles et cetera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...