Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Garu vs Nationwide


Garu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6325 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick first post (hello)...

 

Not started proceedings yet, just researching before I launch the assault.

 

In the past six years, Nationwide have taken at least £4324 from me in charges. However, I am six statements missing, does anyone think it's worth going the DPA route for these, or should I just estimate to £4999 (to keep within small claims) and let them worry about downsizing it?

 

(estimating figures based on months close to missing statements (they are scattered) it's quite believable it will be just over 5k, but I assume it's better to get 97% of something than 100% of nothing.)

 

My (current) thinking is that I will be going for their contractual unauthorised overdraft rate of 1.87% per month, and compounded.

 

I also have statements \ charges beyond 6years, but I think I'll go for the "easy" under 5k \ under 6yrs claim first.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

G.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Garu!

I would send a S.A.R. for ALL your charges and associated interest, since the start of your account with the Nationwide.

The longest it should delay U would be 40days...but it has taken others a lot less time to get their statements.

U will be able to claim back your £10 when U submit you claim.

It's up to U if U want to split your claim e.g 6yrs + more than 6yrs.

Some others have and won...some haven't and also won.

Likewise, some have claimed for more than £5000 and won via the Fast Track and others have played safe and Underclaimed, so as to keep the re-claimed figure within the Small Claims threshold and have played safe.

I agree with U that the Compounded Contractual Unauthorised O/D % Interest Rate (24.9% APR) is the correct one to Charge Nationwide for UNLAWFULLY Borrowing your money.

...However, Banks compound their interest Daily...NOT monthly!

Just put the 24.9% APR and your personal details into the following spreadsheet (courtesy of Mindzai) and it's all done for U.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/51736-excel-contractual-interest-spreadsheet.html

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mini update, went to create a parachute account today, failed credit scoring for premier account with a.n.other bank - makes little sense as borrowed nearly 10k in March to purchase a car with no problems, of which half is paid (no lates etc) and several thousand to deposit with new bank.

 

Head office offered lower account, I guess I need somewhere to put my money when nationwide close this one so will probably accept. Alternatively, girl in local branch was surprised by refusal and says she wants to appeal to underwriter, so all may change yet.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Garu!

 

Try looking at your Credit Report via the Experian free 30 day trial (U can cancel within 30 days) web page...It may reveal hidden credit problems?!

 

A+L (...I assume it's them U applied to?) may think that U are too over-exposed with your current borrowing levels to be able to offer U their top % interest paying account (...wih low % level O/D). Being the best value current account, they may just be being picky?!

U could always re-apply for their top account after a few months of banking with them with the account they've offered U?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MTM... (need to spread around the rep before I can give you more, I did try!)

 

Yes, I think I will do just that, take the lower one and then try and move up in 3-6months. Ulitmately a) I want my money from nationwide and b) I will need somewhere to put it \ my salary, so a few less perks \ interest rate isn't the end of the world.

 

Or, I can stay with all the perks of Nationwide, and they can keep my £5k.... I think not :D

 

(I do need to get my credit report sorted)

 

Thanks again.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit report checked, no nasty surprises.

 

We have one default, £85 of all things in May 2001, but marked as satisfied so nothing more we can do about that. I guess we will see an upturn in June 2007 when that drops off our credit history and we have no defaults etc.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Garu!

 

Credit report checked, no nasty surprises.

 

We have one default, £85 of all things in May 2001, but marked as satisfied so nothing more we can do about that. I guess we will see an upturn in June 2007 when that drops off our credit history and we have no defaults etc.

 

Just playing Devil's Advocate...

But what about the circumstances of the imposition of that DEFAULT?

There has been one or two CAG Members who have threads that detail their progress about having had their defaults removed earlier than 6yrs!!!

Up to U if U want to wait until June...

(...or could be even longer dependant on when the particular account gets updated!!!)

...Or U may just want to get your life back before then???...lol...:);)

 

Hope this gives U further food for thought?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.. I like your thinking!

 

It wasn't Nationwide that placed the default but a CC company, how would you get a third party to accept it "wasn't your fault" and remove it?

 

I'll do a search! Thanks again!

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, done a search, seems there are ways of requesting a bank to remove a default if they applied it as a result of charges.

 

Also, seems there are ways of removing a default in isolation, but they are unrelated to charges that may have caused this.

 

I'm going to put that "on the back burner" and concentrate on the bank claim.

 

I am going to send my prelim letter, I note that you should not claim for 8% until court, but as I am going for contractual compound do I mention this in my first letter, or wait till court?

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the default is in relation to the bank charges then it would be a good idea to conquer the two at the same time.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the default is in relation to the bank charges then it would be a good idea to conquer the two at the same time.

 

I agree, if it was the bank that applied it, but I cannot see GE capital agreeing to remove it on my stating "it's all nationwide's fault".

 

It expires in May anyway.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year Garu!

Contractual Interest has to be claimed in the Preliminary letter and U have to mention it at each letter stage, so that the Bank has a chance to pay it or dispute it.

Just enclose an updated version of your spreadsheet with every letter to let them know where your figures are coming from.

Hope this helps?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Created my own spreadsheet so that, should it come to court, I have no problems explaining the charges interest.

 

Have created a letter based on templates here and on the money programme site, so I fully understand what I am asking of them.

 

It is also an LBA, in my opinion there is little point giving them 14days, then another 14days, when both first letters are asking the same, and we know will get the same response. They have 14days to pay back *my* money or I will file in court, and quite prepared to step into the courtroom if they wish.

 

Sent off this morning.

 

(I decided against sending off a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as I only have a couple of statements missing and 40days will "cost" me a month or two's worth of charges back at the beginning of my claim.)

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Created my own spreadsheet so that, should it come to court, I have no problems explaining the charges interest.

 

Have created a letter based on templates here and on the money programme, so I fully understand what I am asking of them.

 

It is also an LBA, in my opinion there is little point giving them 14days, then another 14days, when both first letters are asking the same, and we know will get the same response. They have 14days to pay back *my* money or I will file in court, and quite prepared to step into the courtroom if they wish.

 

Sent off this morning.

 

(I decided against sending off a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as I only have a couple of statements missing and 40days will "cost" me a month or two's worth of charges back at the beginning of my claim.)

I would be interested to see how you get on with only sending one LBA.

 

Not heard that one before !!

 

Just to confirm, have you just sent your LBA or your Court Action ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not filed court yet, giving them opportunity to pay me back my charges and avoid court costs.

 

Whether or not they have the sense to do that is another matter.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Garu!

 

Have U read some other CAG member's threads that have had their Claims severely delayed during the Court stage, cos Banks have managed to claim that they were NOT given enough time to prepare their Defence etc?

 

Methinks that trying to shortcut the well documented process may actually backfire on U!!!

 

Hopefully I'm wrong?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will have plenty \ the usual amount of time to prepare their defence, I feel 14days is plenty enough time to make a decision whether or not to pay me back.

 

We both know what their decision will be.

G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...