Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please accept my apologies for the delayed update, but i have been trawling through emails for supporting evidence, you see we are in the consultation phase and there will be three meetings during the process. So as i have said  my role is at risk due to the scoring and mine being low. As explained i never received my report as my line manager left during December and i was on leave. So i was not afforded any meeting, i received no feedback at all, so how am i meant to know any areas to improve or to attain a higher grade. So with this in mind i gathered my supporting evidence, i found the email from my then line manager and the objectives that he set out and we agreed.   I then supplied 20 emails that  showed that not only did i reach the targets, i smashed them, highlighting areas that i had saved the company a considerable amount of money, idented issues  implemented process and solutions with ongoing support. All emails are verified and prove that i should have received the highest possible grade going by their criteria. I also included the email from HR when i challenged  the score and they replied with " the outgoing manager supplied thorough feedback to the incoming interim manager who should have provided this (this was never received, and report i received was blank with just a score. Highlighted was the email from HR stating " a two is not a concerning grade"  well clearly it is as less than a month later it is what was used to decide i was at risk. I have supplied this information to the line manager and the external HR rep that was on the call as i have 48 hours to supply this. Had i had a proper and fair review like everyone else had then i would have been able to provide this evidence when he issued the score, he could not argue with the sheer volume of evidence that i had. This proves what was said to me when i took this position, " there was some politics in me getting the role, their line manager had promised the role to one of his guys, they cant really do anything but watch your back" He should not have promised this anyway as two interviews were required in the process *which i sat) so i earned the right to the role. This was because the three of them knew there was a lot that would be uncovered and they wanted it covering, i started to see this after two weeks, had i not said anything then it would have looked as though i was incompetent or stupid. I did try to work with them on this to remedy but sadly they went the other rout instead.    
    • He'll be asking Truss for advice and help next ... or maybe go straight to a lettuce He already asked Swella How do you survive all those breaches of ministerial code etc She is rumored to have replied - dunno - if the positions were reversed, I'd have sacked me in without a seconds thought
    • Dear Stu. I have been very annoyed that they put this fee on my account right now, as you said the court might rule that i have to pay it further on. This sounds like a dodgy practice. Below is what the account manager sent to me when i asked her why this was getting added to my account right now. Is this legal what they are doing i.e. pre-empting the judges decision it seems. 'Thank you for the email.  The court fees have been added to your account as you have not vacated the property. If the court decide that the landlord is not able to recoup the costs, we would remove the charge from your account.  At present, the court costs have not been deducted from the payment you made towards the rent.'
    • Yay!! Plan to submit tomorrow. Thanks for all the support. I'm so out of my comfort zone. Will keep thread updated and continue reading. Just want them gone!   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ Dismissed - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

looks like they did an n244 which they should sent you.

plenty of erudio sj threads here, have a good read.

 

pop your statement ideas up early so we can help.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure what in the last few posts you were up too but we need the complete n244 from erudio in one mass file pdf (or 2 if over 4.8mb sized)

in the order of the n244 they sent you. 

ive hidden all the posts as lots of your pdfs are duplicate or contain unredacted info.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX. I'm a tad stuck! I've worked out how to combine all the docs into one PDF. I was trying to send over the 30 pages of info I just received from the court. All the correspondence that Erudio has sent me and statements etc.

I haven't received any N244 documents. There is a letter in the bundle from Erudio saying that they would apply to lift the stay without further notice.

I have also received a summary judgment hearing date from the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant get an SJ application / then a hearing on a stayed claim without an N244 being filed.

we dont need the statements

what does mcol claim history say has gone on.?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

My apologies. I have received the N244 forms which were sent in a letter with the notice of transfer of proceedings on 23rd June. I received the same bundle again this week along with the letter for the notice of hearing in October. MCOL doesn't let me log on anymore as Newcastle court said their system is very dated.

n244.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

had that since may then.........

get everything else they sent back up properly please.

dont need statements.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well shame you didnt come here before you filed your defence.

should have just been it is SB's not the rest  but there we go.

there are quite a few erudio SLC loan claimform threads as well as SJ threads

Hart does not apply to an SLC loan as its NOT Hire Purchase loan. this is covered in them.

and the default notices were issued several months or even years after your actual last deferment/payment on each loan. the real SB date.

a creditor cannot just issue a dn when they feel like it....effectively running the SB date to infinity by deciding that date at their choosing. again covered in the threads here.

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks DX. When I filed my first defence I just looked at examples on the posts from other people in the same situation. I'm obviously very new to this but I'll check everything out on here with you before acting.

Going forward, I'll have a good read-up on here as suggested. I will attend court when the date arrives. Is there anything else I can do in order to prepare? 

I have to say you all do a fantastic job what you're doing. I'd be even more clueless without this forum!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Pelligrino, 

Is there anything else you can do in advance of the court date? 

I'd say there is. 

Did you originally send an CCA S.77 request? If so, what did they send you?  When I sent my S.77 request they have only sent me the first page of my agreement.  I would contend that because they've not sent the 2nd page that it means that Erudio are in breach of the CCA 1974 act.  Which would also mean that until they fulfil the terms then the debt is unenforceable.   DX may confirm, or disabuse me of this notion.

I too am going through the process of fighting the Doyle/Hart argument submitted by Erudio so I will follow your case with great interest.  My hearing is a week after yours.

Nurselayer v Natwest - Settled in Full :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I've had a look at some posts on here but can't find much about what else I can do until my court appearance. I can't actually remember if I sent Erudio a CCA request. I think I may have done as I remember sending something years ago but obviously, if I haven't got any evidence of doing so it's pointless anyhow.

Any guidance or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to do a statement about 7 days before the hearing if you read the n244 i think

lots of them here in like threads

you need to take theirs and rip it apart para by para in yours.

but the bottom line is the debt is sb'd? as you never deferred to eurdio ever.

dont keep disappearing!

no point in a cca request as the agreements are in your n244 pdf. and anyway, if the debts sb'd what they hold is irrelevent.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi DX,

I have had a good look through all of my docs sent from Erudio and the courts. I haven't found anything about writing a statement. The only form with N244 marked on is the application notice which has been filled in by Erudio.

Will the courts send more documentation out requesting a statement?

I just want to be prepared for going in. I noticed they said I made a payment to the original creditor on 28th Aug 2013. I can't remember doing this at all but I'm pretty certain the debt is still statute-barred which is my main defence.

Any advice on what to do in preparing for the big day would be great!

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll get notification from the court.

just have a read thru some of the existing N244 threads already here.

use our enhanced google searchbox

drydens N244

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

That's great I'll wait for that to arrive.

As Nurselayer has just mentioned requesting the full CCA S77 from Erudio? I haven't done this.

I did notice in the pack they sent me that there are just a few really bad photocopies of the agreements.

On one of the loans it has had the name amended and is handwritten with only the name of the college.

My address isn't even on this form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt is SB'd it doesnt what paperwork they have,

now re reading your thread ....you already have a court date in october havent you...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have a court date at the end of October.

I'm just looking through all the docs that Erudio sent through and by the looks of it they do have a signed D10 form dated 19/08/13. Not that I have any recollection whatsoever of signing or filling anything in. The claim form from the court was 03/06/19. Does this mean it isn't SB'd? 

The other thing I've noticed when looking through the SL statements of account is the fact that there were no payments made at all from 1996-2008. I'd imagine that when I was at Uni I would have deferred for a few years but from 2000 onwards I just can't recall filling anything in. I wasn't the sensible individual I am today! Would this mean the debt was already SB'd all the way back then anyhow?

Just on another note. I have nothing listed on my credit file and it's been squeaky clean with a high score for a good 20 years now. There has never been anything from Erudio or Student loans etc appear on this.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

student loans dont appear on credit files,

urm it would be fun to find out if you did not defer 2000 - 2008 ....if there was a 6yrs period yes sb'd back then.

that time would have been with SLC so you'll need to contact them.

and ofcourse these are obv the same loans erudio are going on about just to check i expect so

if you can prove no deferment 2000-2008 you should be home free .......good work.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, I'll give them a ring and find out.

Yes, they were the same loans. So hopefully it will be double sb'd!

My worry with the more recent sb'd period is the signature of the application to defer is a few months within the 6 years.

A payment was also made in August 2013 to SLC.

I have no recollection doing this at all which I find very odd.

Erudio then whacked in the court claim just a few months before the 6 yrs was hit.

I've read that this stops the clock. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it was already SB'd it cant be unbarred.... not even a judge can do that. so nothing later matters.

SLC should have records. they still remain an overall administrator .

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - prob SB'd - now N244 lift stay/SJ

Hi,

I rang student loan company today and requested the dates of the times I deferred my student loan. They said they had no information regarding the loans as they were now with Erudio.

The paperwork that Erudio has sent me in relation to the case. Has nothing about deferment dates. They do have student loan statements running right back to the start of the loan but nothing else. I'm starting to think that the paperwork they sent me through that is everything they have.

As I mentioned before I'm pretty sure the loan was sb'd before Erudio took over but it doesn't look like they can prove it was deferred prior to this. Obviously, I can't prove that I didn't defer them but my statements show no payments were made.

Any idea where I should go from here?

Student loans said to ring Erudio but I wasn't keen on doing that until I asked you. It's certainly looking like all the bumph they sent me is everything they've got.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the benefit of SB is they have to disprove your claim, not you have to prove it.

so if they have indeed no data that you did defer, then their claim will fail.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi DX,

The post arrived today and yet another pack from Dryens arrived. This is the 3rd pack I have received with the same information. Hearing notice, Claimant's N244 application, and their witness statement.

I'm just short of a month away from the court hearing and I'm obviously getting a tad anxious about the whole thing! 

I've never gone through anything like this and just not sure what to do going forward. I haven't received anything else from the court as of yet apart from the hearing notice.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 16/08/2023 at 20:15, dx100uk said:

you need to do a statement about 7 days before the hearing if you read the n244 i think

lots of them here in like threads

you need to take theirs and rip it apart para by para in yours.

but the bottom line is the debt is sb'd? as you never deferred to eurdio ever.

 

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...