Jump to content


Packlink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim to Evri - new Mcol system


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Please see below for a brief rundown of everything that has happened so far.

 

20/11/22 - I paid for an Evri shipping label through eBay's shipping label purchasing system. I packaged the item, printed the label off and dropped the parcel off at an Evri Parcel Shop.

21/11/22 - Evri tracking showed that at 13:27 - Mon Nov 21 they had received my parcel at the ParcelShop and that they would be collecting it shortly. At 15:17 - Mon Nov 21 Evri tracking showed that they had collected my parcel.

26/11/22 - The buyer opened a request through eBay as the item had not been delivered.

29/11/22 - Evri as the item had not been delivered.

03/12/22 - eBay refunded the buyer the £850 they paid for the item.

04/12/22 - Evri confirmed that the parcel was unaccounted for and that I should follow my own procedures for lost parcels. Since this date, there has been a lot of back and forth Evri and they refused to pay me compensation for the lost parcel.

30/12/22 - After several back and forth emails I sent Evri a Letter of Claim stating that in 14 days, I would be issuing a claim against them.

05/01/23 - I received the latest email from Evri stating that they could not offer me any compensation as the the shipping label was bought through Packlink through eBay's packing label purchasing system.

 

I issued an MCOL on 17/01/22. Evri has just responded denying the claim, stating that there is no contractual relationship between myself and Evri only myself and Packlink so they are not liable for any claims. However, through reading these forums I am aware that I through the Rights of Third Parties Act that they can be held liable.

 

I am not sure what to do next and would really appreciate your help. I can also attached their response for clarity if need be.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DQ N180 Time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Pcklink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim against evri issued -they defended - whats next please?

Please post your letter of claim and also your claim form in PDF format

Also their defence.

Also make sure you have read very thoroughly around this sub- forum. There are many issues but the issue of third party rights is something that is particularly prominent at the moment.

Especially read this thread

And also the discussion from here onwards:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I will have a read through those threads. 
 

Please see attached for the LOC, Claim Form and their defence. Please note they have not submitted their through the MCOL service, they only emailed it to me and it has been over a month and they have passed their requested extension so I have been presented with the option of requesting a CCJ. Would greatly appreciate your advice. Thank you. 

366MC231 NHK v EVRi Parcelnet Limited.pdf 366MC231-claim-form-claimant-copy.pdf Letter of Claim.pdf

Edited by SpecialK71
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the option of applying for judgement then you should have done it straight away .

The whole purpose of issuing a claim is to get judgement .

If the other side doesn't meet the deadlines then it is open to you to apply for judgement and I'm not sure why you are hanging around .

Go and apply for the judgement immediately.

You are simply handing an advantage to them if you don't.

You risk losing this case simply because you haven't responded to their failure to meet a particular deadline.

I see that their defence is dated the 20th of February.

It may well be that by the time you try to apply for judgement, you will discover that there is a copy of the defence on the MoneyClaim system .

The response deadline for your original claim was the 6th of February. I understand that they applied for an extension and this would take them to the 20th .

It is quite usual that these people slip in their paperwork at the very last moment .

However, you should keep an eye open and if you are given an opportunity to apply for judgement, then you should do it immediately and don't hang around asking us.

If you are able to apply for judgement then do it but be ready for them to apply for a set-aside of the judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I checked the system yesterday they had not responded however, the option to apply for a CCJ. However, when I checked this morning, the option was there so I have submitted that request. 
 

They sent the below wording in the email with the defence letter at 12:50pm yesterday:

 

Dear sir,

 

Please see attached Defence that has also been filed with the court.

 

Due to an error with the defendants system we are unable to upload the defence online and therefore have been advised to issue this to you via email. In the meantime the court will update the system.

———————————————————————————

They had until 4pm on the 20th to respond. However their defence is still not in the system so I don’t know how legitimate the message above is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on applying for the judgement but be aware that it probably won't go through .

 

It is essential that you keep on top of deadlines .

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are were right @BankFodder

 

The MCOL was updated with the below:

 

Evri applied by post to change something about the claim

We’ll post you a copy of their application. This will explain what you need to do next.

Your online account won’t be updated - any further updates will be by post.

--------------------------------------------------------------

I also received an email from [email protected] stating the below:

 

 

Good morning

The Defendant has filed their defence, a copy of which is attached to this email.

Both parties now need to complete the attached Directions Questionnaire, form N180, before 16:00pm on 10/03/2023.

Please email your completed N180 form, as an attachment, to [email protected] for filing. A copy should also be sent to the other party named on the claim.

Please be aware that if you don’t complete and return the Directions Questionnaire (N180) to the Court for filing, your claim and/or defence could be struck out.

Please contact us if you require any further information.

 

I have attached the N180 form. It seems pretty straightforward just want your advice just incase there is anything I should be looking out for. Thank you.

MCOL Update.pdf N180 form 06.22 fillable.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

A1 yes

c1 yes

d1 no

E1 your nearest Co Court 

E2 no

E3 1

E4 as required

E5 we dont know

 

copy to court and claimant solicitor.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Packlink/Evri lost my £850 parcel - court claim to Evri - new Mcol system
  • 2 weeks later...

Is there a claim status page?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try to help us by properly redacting and making a multipage PDF

done it for you.

read upload next time please

 

was due the 10th.

only 4 days since then

often courts take weeks to process N180's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

give it a week

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Could you give us the date of the appointment please or is it a secret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the moment start doing lots of reading. Even if you think you have done enough, go over it all again. Concentrating on the rights of third parties which I seem to remember is the big issue in your claim.

 

Stand by for a further response tomorrow

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay so you have a mediation appointment in approximately two weeks. You haven't been asked to file any documents yet – no court bundle et cetera. That would normally come if and when you are notified of a trial date.

So for the moment EVRi is going to put you through the usual time wasting and resource wasting exercise of going through the mediation ritual. They will try to knock you down. Of course they will start off by saying that you don't have a contract with them and you are suing the wrong people. Hopefully you know the answers to that and I think that you should be quite abrupt and assertive. So forget you will be talking to a mediator who wasn't personally involved – but however, the messages that you relay through the mediator should be short. Don't stop giving fantastic explanations and spending a lot of time making wordy replies.

Stand your ground for every last penny. Don't give up a single inch including all of your costs and also insist on interest if you have claimed that in your claim form – I can't quite remember.

When the mediator tries to put pressure on you to compromise you should tell the mediator that they are exceeding their authority and that they are advising you to compromise on your statutory rights and that this is not acceptable.

Tell them that the only compromise would be that you won't go to trial and therefore EVRi won't have a judgement against them on the issue of third party rights so that they will be able to keep on conning all sorts of other innocent customers on the same issue.

If you do your reading then you will understand exactly the situation. Ask us questions. Don't forget that the mediation is nothing formal. You just talk to somebody on the telephone and then they relay messages and then they come back to you.
However, if you feel the slightest bit of pressure from the mediator then you should be assertive with the mediator and say to them that you don't think it is their job to put pressure and that they are simply there to pass messages.
And the message for EVRi is pay me all my money – every last penny – or else we go to court. End of story

 

Incidentally, here is something that we haven't suggested before.

When EVRi says that you should be suing Packlink – tell the mediator to tell EVRi that you are enforcing your rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act – but that if EVRi want to involve Packlink then it is always open to them to apply to have Packlink joined to the claim as a co-defendant.
Of course EVRi won't like that. Dear me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...