Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC Marbles credit card SD - was dismissed as voluntary joint charge provided - now owed by Cabot - settled at home sale - was i overcharged?


Recommended Posts

Thanks dx.

if I understand you correctly, I should send a SAR to Mortimer Clarke?

The payment was made to their account.

They were taking instructions from Marlin Europe 1 Ltd.

No action is needed on the Court's Order?

I understand about the other Cabot debt.

Thank you.

 

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

just re read. all are cabot group but id sent everyone an sar each its free now.

cabot, mortimer, marlin 1 

On 11/03/2024 at 15:34, tedney said:

No action is needed on the Court's Order?

whT COURT's ORDER AND WHAT ACTION ? opps caps

On 24/01/2009 at 18:28, tedney said:

I was issued with a Statutory Demand by a cedit card company a while back

and subsequently agreed to a Legal Charge on a property for a fixed sum.

HFC raised a statutory demand ..you then panicked and agreed and you both signed a voluntary charge.

there is nothing you can do now at all

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx.

"I subsequently agreed to a Legal Charge on a property for a fixed sum"

But the CH1 Legal Charge, Paragraph 8 stated "To secure the sum of £9,817.15 only, such sum to be repaid by a schedule of repayments as may be agreed by the parties from time to time"

I had an agreement, as referred to in post numbers 55 and 67 amongst other posts on this thread and payments were made on a monthly basis for many years.

My point is that the balance owed, after the agreed monthly payments made after the issue of the CH1 to clear the charge as at January 2023 was lower than that stated by Mortimer Clarke.

They were informed of this.

I received no statements from anyone showing all payments made.

I "panicked" (as you describe) as I was threatened with bankruptcy and had inadequate legal advice as mentioned in a previous post on this thread.

I'm just trying to obtain some justice!!!

In response to post 85:

I quote from my post number 82:

Before the Legal Charge was issued Weightmans tried to make me Bankrupt.

This was dealt with in a county court which made an order in the case, dismissing the Bankruptcy Petition.

In the Court's Order, there is a Note to Debtor:

“It is your responsibility and is in your interest to ensure that the registration of the petition as an entry, both in the Land Charges Register and your registered titles, is cancelled.”

I have checked today and can confirm that the entry of the charge on the Land Registry has been removed.

Does this satisfy the Court's Note please?

That is a quote from the court order when the bankruptcy petition was dismissed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tedney said:

I have checked today and can confirm that the entry of the charge on the Land Registry has been removed.

Does this satisfy the Court's Note please?

yes

2 hours ago, tedney said:

the CH1 Legal Charge, Paragraph 8 stated "To secure the sum of £9,817.15 only

12 hours ago, tedney said:

The original Legal Charge on the CH1 included a Weightmans fee of £741.50.

The sum of £7,322.36 (including W. fees) was paid to Mortimer Clarke to satisfy the charge in January 2023.

The last payments were made in 2021.

According to my records, the actual sum owed, after considering the repayments made since the Legal Charge was issued, was £5,889.88.

The last account statement was received in October 2009.

an overcharge of £1,432.48 upon settlement.

On 29/12/2009 at 14:53, tedney said:

I tried to get the SD set aside, as the amount stated on the SD was above the sum on the "default notice" by approx £1K5 (overall sum approx £9K)

£1500 added from the default notice figure. a DN that is not 'met' within 14 days should lead to termination of the agreement, no further interest should thus be charged.

On 25/08/2014 at 15:50, tedney said:

I was paying off regular amounts before charge, and after DN 

 the repayment figure should thus be even lower then, not £1500 higher.

.....................

the issues in red need to be confirmed by statements etc.

now if you are ever going to get statement of that age out of cabot is another matter.

i would however be sending cabot an sar and in addition to the std statement regarding data they cabot hold,

i would also a line to include :

this sar also relates to data held by companies within your group, including but not limited to: Phoenix (list all the DCA's/sols that have ever had a finger in this debacle) 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE

After sending copies of my driving licence and passport to Cabot (at their request!) Cabot have confirmed that they will provide the response to SAR before 22nd April. They reference the original HFC Bank (Marbles) credit card, as noted on the CH1 legal charge.

Responding to the figures in red on DX' post #86, I have never received statements from anyone for my payments since September 2009, when Phoenix Recoveries allegedly "owned" the debt then. The Statement was provided by Weightmans, payments were being made to Marbles. A written statement verifying the charge on the CH1 was never formally provided, having been agreed at the court hearing.

In response to my SAR Weightmans state that they have no personal data for me, they do confirm that they were "formally instructed" by both Phoenix Recoveries and Marlin, and said they do not hold my personal data "disclosable to you (sic) under Article 15 UK GDPR"

I have had no responses to my SAR requests from Mortimer Clark or Marlin. I appreciate that they are part of Cabot, but as per previous post, SAr was sent to all.

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another Update

Mortimer Clarke have advised that they will not be providing any information to me under my SAR, as they have been requested to supply to Cabot. Their letter to me was initially sent to an incorrect address! Hopefully they will supply correct information to Cabot!

Weightmans have confirmed that HFC (the original creditor) sold the account to Phoenix on 20/5/2008, then on 12/04/2011 Phoenix sold the account to MCE Portfolio Ltd (which have I had never been advised of!) Then on 17/10/2011 MCE transferred the account to Marlin 1 Europe. On 18/02/2016 Marlin then assigned the account to Cabot Financial (Marlin) Ltd.

In 2018 Weightmans stated that they were instructed to "close all live files on this portfolio". Weightmans have not confirmed who instructed them and precisely when. Weightmans also stated that "as W ceased to act on the account over six years ago, we no longer have a file on our system which relates"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HFC Can a DCA renew or replace a Statutory Demand for same debt?

I have had a further response from Cabot. They state that they have "found" 2 additional accounts in my name on their files, and did I want the SAR to apply to these accounts too.

One of the other accounts they have already confirmed to me is unenforceable. The other account they say is "closed". It was originally a MSDW credit card account which was moved/sold to Goldfish in their corporate shenanigans.

I stopped paying that card very many years ago, as MSDW were returning my payments!

My question is,

if I confirm to Cabot that I want the the SAR to apply to these accounts too, will they/can they resurrect any issues with these 2 accounts?

A comment relevant to post #107 above, Mortimer Clarke have agreed a small payment to me in respect of their mistake of sending correspondence to the wrong address!

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant unbar a debt, once SB'd.... not even a judge can do that!
dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now received my SAR.

It includes a great deal of information!

s there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors?

I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me.

I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case?

Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt?

Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property.

Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made!

Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused.

I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me.

Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs.

on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info.

as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charging Orders do not attract any fees or interest/charges , it is merely a provision to secure the judgment.

 

 

.

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006

Admitted debt £9075.65

Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation

The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25

Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this.

Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR.

Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee.

Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR

I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018.

I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made?

I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded.

I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

must rather see the statements.

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have all the statements, they were not all provided. I have latter years from Marlin 2011 to close at 2023, and just a10 month period from Weightmans starting October 2008. Neither accurately record my payments, as above some payments, for which I do not have their statements were recorded by Weightmans over a year after they were made! I can see the payments on their System Notes and Letters supplied with the SAR

I can send, but I would need to send very many pages and you or someone would need to scroll through all the entries to identify the payments made. There are only the actual statements as I have described above.This I have done hence the figures above.

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...