Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evri- £400 item missing - Court Claim Issued-**Settled at mediation. Confidentiality agreement signed**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll be interested to see what happens with this. 

Imminent County Court claim against Evri £600 lost parcel - Page 2 - Postal and Delivery Services - Consumer Action Group

 

I'm at the start of a potentially similar journey. 

Posted something worth £400 10 days ago and it's still showing as not picked up from the drop-off shop yet. 

The shop claim it's been picked up though.

It's just not showing as such on the website. 

 

I didn't pay for extra insurance, though don't remember being offered it. 

if lost the compensation is only £25. 

However, if my legal rights trump that I'd be interested in making a claim! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Natsirt said:

I'll be interested to see what happens with this.  I'm at the start of a potentially similar journey.  Posted something worth £400 10 days ago and it's still showing as not picked up from the drop-off shop yet.  The shop claim it's been picked up though. It's just not showing as such on the website. 

 

I didn't pay for extra insurance, though don't remember being offered it.  Anyway, if lost the compensation is only £25.  However, if my legal rights trump that I'd be interested in making a claim! 

Please will you post your story on a new thread.

 

The more stories we have, the better it is. Also, we will be able to help you and guide you through the process. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 
Will do. Still early days as they’ve not said it’s lost yet. Who knows, it might still turn up. Just anticipating what to do if it doesn’t. Will start a thread when/if it gets to that stage. 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post removed.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created for you

rather than hi-jacking someone elses.

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so no news from Evri.  However Packlink's customer support emailed to say I need to raise a lost claim.  I'm on the form and it asks for shipment reference, value of the goods, proof of value (eg, ebay invoice), description, and bank account details (presumably to auto pay the claim). 

 

The form also pre-populates the cover amount (£25).  I'm concerned that by submitting the claim they'll pay the £25 as if I've waived my rights to full (£400) compensation. 

 

I plan to email customer support back to say that I'll submit a claim, but that I won't accept anything below the full value of the goods and that by submitting the form I am not agreeing to the £25 limit. I don't think that this is at "letter before action" stage yet because they haven't refused the full claim yet. Should I be ok to email Customer Support back with the following, and then immediately submit the Lost claim form

 

"Dear Packlink

 

Thank you for your suggestion to raise a Lost ticket on your system.  I note that the form states a compensation limit of £25, however under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 I am entitled to full compensation without the need to purchase additional insurance to provide this.  I will therefore not accept anything less that £400 compensation for this loss. By submitting the form I do not agree to a lower level of compensation.  If you automatically pay me £25 in compensation I will expect the remaining £375 to be also paid and will be prepared to take legal action to enforce this.

 

Yours sincerely, 

 

(My full name)" 

 

 I would also include the following in the item description box on the form (the only place to add text): "As per my email of (date) to Packlink Customer Support I expect full compensation for this item and will not accept a lower amount" 

I have 2 questions: 

 

1) Is the email above appropriate?

2) Should I wait for a response to that email before submitting the form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats their default, but cant harm your claim going forward.

 

you need to get reading up as this q has been asked numerous times here.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've read through the pinned posts in the "Postal and Delivery Services" forum.  Here's the latest on my situation. 

 

1) I emailed Packlink last week with the email I drafted above.  I had no reply by Monday. 


2) I submitted a "Lost" ticket on the Packlink site on Monday given lack of reply to the above.  This was my only option as the Evri one kept referring me back to Packlink.  On the ticket in the description box I added a note referring to the email and stating I wouldn't accept anything other than full value. 

 

3) I got a standard response from Packlink to the Lost ticket, saying they're investigating with Evri which might take 7-14 days.  No reference to my point about compensation, but that's as expected for an automated response. 

 

4) I got a reply to my email from Packlink (see text below). Effectively saying "no insurance = only £25 comp"

The email from Packlink doesn't refer to the Lost ticket I raised, so I think I should just sit tight for the next 7-14 days whilst they investigate with Evri. Once it's confirmed as lost I can pick up again either with Packlink or more likely with Evri based on the 3rd Party Contract thing. 

 

Is that the right approach, or should I be doing something else at this stage? 

Here is the email I got back from Packlink: 

"Dear XXXXX,
 
From our records your shipment is only covered by Standard Compensation. Unfortunately, we cannot process your claim for the full content value as you did not purchase enhanced compensation.
 
We remind you that every shipment purchased on eBay Delivery is protected against damage and loss.
 
There are two types of compensation: standard and enhanced.
 
Standard Compensation
Every shipment done with eBay Delivery includes a standard compensation that protects your item against damage or loss. The amount of the standard compensation depends on the type of service you have purchased. In fact you can make a claim:
 

  • Of up to £25 for all EVRi, Inpost and Yodel delivery services.
  • Of up to £60 for UPS, DPD and DHL delivery services.
  • The EVRi Postable service does not include standard compensation therefore to protect your parcel enhanced compensation must be purchased with the postage label.

 
Please remember that packaging or any other extra cost the buyer might have paid is excluded from the compensation.
 
Enhanced Compensation
If the value of your sold item is higher, you can purchase enhanced compensation with your label, which will protect your item up to a maximum of £5.000. The cost of enhanced compensation is 3% + VAT of the value of the goods you are insuring.
 
Remember that you will have to always present the purchase invoice/receipt of your goods and the date of the invoice needs to be less than 60 days old. If you don't have the purchase invoice, then you need to present a self-declaration of value accompanied by a proof of value (the ebay listing or the purchase receipt of your buyer).
 
As stated in our eBay Delivery Powered by Packlink Terms and Conditions Clause 14(a) Packlink’s liability (whether in contract, tort, negligence or otherwise and howsoever arising) for the loss, theft or damage to any Goods and/or any other matter under or in connection with these Conditions shall, unless the User has chosen enhanced compensation cover as set out in Section 15 (b) be limited to £25.00 for all EVRi, Yodel and InPost delivery services (twenty five GBP), and to £60.00 for UPS, DPD and DHL delivery services (sixty GBP), whereas EVRi Postable service does not include standard compensation. Packlink shall under no circumstances be liable to the User, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of statutory duty or otherwise, for any loss of profit or indirect or consequential loss.
 
 For future orders, if your parcel's content is valued above the standard compensation make sure to purchase enhanced compensation to secure the full value of your goods.
 
We apologise for the inconveniences.
 
Kind regards,

Marcela
Customer Service Advisor
eBay Delivery powered by Packlink"

 

 

 

And now I've had confirmation that the package is lost.  Packlink have issued me a refund of £25 plus the delivery cost. 

 

I've read the pinned posts and understand the claim will ultimately be with Evri, however my communication so far, and the initial refund, was only with Packlink. 

 

As I understand it I need to send a Letter of Claim as part of the pre-action protocol. 

 

What I'm unsure of is whether this needs to be with Packlink or Evri at this stage. 

 

 Could I get some guidance from @dx100uk or @BankFodder on next steps please? 

 

Is that correct step and who should it be sent to at this point? 

 

Your help is very much appreciated! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send your letter of claim to EVRi. All correspondence now goes to EVRi. Make it clear that eventually you will be suing EVRi and you will be asserting your rights as an entitled third-party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here's what I've drafted to send to Evri.  I plan to address it to their CEO (Martijn de Lange) and send special delivery.  Any suggestions before I do so? 

 

Dear Martijn and Evri team,

 

Reference: Claim for full compensation for lost item under Consumer Rights Act 2015

 

I am writing with a formal letter of claims regarding a parcel lost in your network.  The parcel contained musical equipment that I had sold on eBay for £400.  The Evri barcode number was: XXXXXXXX

 

The parcel was posted via Evri, arranged with the eBay Packlink service on March 13th 2023.  It was confirmed lost on March 30th following an investigation by Packlink and Evri.  Whilst arranged through Packlink I am claiming full compensation directly from Evri under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 and Consumers Rights Act 2015.

 

I did not take our additional insurance on the item as my rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 mean that Evri should cover the full cost without an additional insurance cost.  Evri cannot contract itself out of or expect customers to pay an additional charge for its legal obligations to consumers.

 

I was automatically refunded £25 and the original postage cost after submitting a Lost ticket, however I had made it clear through email to Packlink prior to submitting the ticket that I would not settle for this amount given my legal rights.  I am therefore claiming the remaining £375 directly from Evri.

 

If my claim is not approved within 30 days of receipt of this letter I will issue proceedings against you in the County Court.

 

I look forward to your response and hope to settle this issue amicably with you.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you giving them 30 days. You only have to give them 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is fine but if you are thinking that it is 30 days for some reason or other then I think that you need to go back and do some more reading before sending it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I sent the letter and received the following response by email today, which doesn't directly refer to my letter but instead mentions

 

"You recently raised a query through our support pages". 

 

Whilst I'm 99% certain this IS in response to the letter I sent I've emailed Stephen back asking him to confirm this is the case before I respond fully just so the chain of events it perfectly clear. 

I'll do some more reading on the rights of 3rd parties element as that's their main objection below. 
 

Reference: XXXXXXXXXXX

You recently raised a query through our online support pages. Below is a summary of your request and our response.

Please be assured that we are still investigating this for you and will update you when we know more. Thank you for your patience, it is much appreciated.

 

If you have an account, you can log in and track your incident by clicking here

 

Response By E-mail (Stephen) (XX/04/2023 XX.XX PM)
Dear XXXXXXX
 
In reference to parcel XXXXXXXXX
 
My name is Stephen and I am contacting you from the Evri executive office on behalf of Martijn De Lange, who has requested that I investigate this matter further.
 
I am truly sorry to see that your parcel has not reached it's destination and that you are having such difficulty with your claim. I'm afraid that we are only able to process any claim for compensation when the original delivery order is placed directly with ourselves.
 
As the original order was placed via Packlink, all claims can only be processed by their team.
 
Please accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience this may cause and don't hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss this further.
 
Yours Sincerely
 
Steve
 
Stephen Ryan
Evri Executive Office
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you remind us, was two your letter to them A letter of claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Evri- £400 item 10 days ago missing

OK. That was the letter of claim.

 

When is day 15?

Link to post
Share on other sites

and what date did you send it by email? only was it?

 

you ideally should never just be using email for a letter of claim.

 you should also back it up with a royal mail letter by 1st class  and get free proof of posting too at any po counter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent signed for and see they received and signed for it on the 19th. So 4th May will be day 15. 
 

That’s why I messaged them back asking to confirm their email to me was in direct response to the letter. 
 

This is what I sent:

 

Dear Stephen, 

 
Thank you for your email. Before I respond in full could you please confirm that your email is in response to the letter dated 15th April that I sent by recorded delivery to Evri c/o Martijn De Lange?  I ask because the email you sent today refers to a query raised through your support pages online. Whilst I did initially raise queries through the support pages I also wrote a formal letter dated 15th April.  I want to be entirely clear that your email is in response to that letter before proceeding any further as I requested a response and full settlement of my claim within 14 days of receipt of that letter.  Failure to satisfactorily settle that claim within those 14 days will result in me issuing proceedings against Evri in the County Court. 

Yours sincerely,”
Link to post
Share on other sites

You send a letter of claim and set a deadline.

You also set a condition for not proceeding with your threat to begin a legal action.

 

It doesn't need any more responses from you and if any responses they send you don't exactly  meet your conditions then you should simply ignore them and proceed with your threat on day 15 .

 

This most recent letter which apparently you have sent is frankly confusing and almost risks being interpreted as something which is extending the letter of claim.

 

Have confidence in what you are doing. You should understand that they won't give you your reimbursement and that you will definitely have to start the claim.

 

Have you registered with the county court website MoneyClaim?

 

Have you started preparing your claim? If not then why not?

 

Post a draft of your particulars of claim here so we can check it before you click it off.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here are the particulars of claim.  Is there anything else you'd add?  Does the fact that Packlink rather than Evri refunded the initial £25 complicate things?  Getting the item confirmed as lost had to go through Packlink, hence them doing the refund. 

 

"On 13th March 2023 the claimant contracted the defendants via Packlink to deliver a parcel to an address within the UK.  Item Value: £400,  Delivery fee:  £5.86. Tracking number H0067A0143893128

By 30th March the defendant had failed to deliver the parcel and on that day the defendant confirmed the parcel was lost. On 22nd April the defendant refused to deal with a loss complaint stating the claimant purchased the delivery service via a third party.  On 6th April, following an investigation with Evri, Packlink reimbursed the defendant in part to the value of £25 unilaterally. The claimant is seeking full reimbursement by exercising their rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

The Claimant Claims:

The balance of the full value of the item: £375

The delivery fee of £5.86

Court Claim Fee £50

The total sum being £430.86"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rather wordy. Does it fit into the word limit on the MoneyClaim website ?

It doesn't make any difference that 25 pounds was refunded from packlink.

Check the word limit but I think we can clean it up a bit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check back later

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...