Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BLS Collections [LTSB] Tactics


Number6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is the second letter I have received from BLS collections who are acting as "DCA" on behalf of LTSB cards and who are actually a trading name of LTSB.

 

I replied to the first "standard" collections letter from them with a request for no further contact because LTSB Card Services are in default of my CCA Section 78 Statutory Request.

 

This second letter came anyway and is interesting on two counts:

 

1) BLS suggest using "savings, alternative financing or the help of a family member" to clear the debt!!!

 

2) They are offering a reduced settlement figure [the words used are "....settling your account for a reduced amount"] but then go on to say "On receipt of cleared funds, our Client will advise the Credit Reference Agencies to amend your records to show this account as partially settled..."----- Settled, partially settled,... can't they make up their minds??

 

Naughty, naughty BLS / LTSB!!

 

This will be submitted to TS and FSA with a complaint.

 

BLS_offer_1_adulterated.jpg

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

TUT TUT..

 

By including "without prejudice" in the box, are you now unable to produce this as evidence in court or does that just relate to the ammount?

 

I would argue that the "Without Prejudice" header applies only to the amount as it is enclosed in a completely seperate box.

 

The letter also breaches 2.6(b) of the OFT Debt Collection Guidance Document of July 2003 which section states:

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. contacting debtors at unreasonable times and at unreasonable intervals

b. pressurising debtors to sell property, to raise funds by further

borrowing or to extend their borrowing

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest tlusnoc

I came to a full and final settlement agreement with HSBC over a credit card debt. Whilst they wrote the balance off and my credit record shows a zero balance. They put a note on the record saying "Payment received as a full and final settlement although the payment would not fully clear the balance." I went ballistic with them, though they insist it is a correct statement and refuse to remove it. My bank even refused to upgrade my account from a basic to current because of the partial settlement note.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I came to a full and final settlement agreement with HSBC over a credit card debt. Whilst they wrote the balance off and my credit record shows a zero balance. They put a note on the record saying "Payment received as a full and final settlement although the payment would not fully clear the balance." I went ballistic with them, though they insist it is a correct statement and refuse to remove it. My bank even refused to upgrade my account from a basic to current because of the partial settlement note.

 

I do think that on those occasions they do it just out of spite, in an effort to feel big and important... :-|

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
This is the second letter I have received from BLS collections who are acting as "DCA" on behalf of LTSB cards and who are actually a trading name of LTSB.

 

I replied to the first "standard" collections letter from them with a request for no further contact because LTSB Card Services are in default of my CCA Section 78 Statutory Request.

 

This second letter came anyway and is interesting on two counts:

 

1) BLS suggest using "savings, alternative financing or the help of a family member" to clear the debt!!!

 

2) They are offering a reduced settlement figure [the words used are "....settling your account for a reduced amount"] but then go on to say "On receipt of cleared funds, our Client will advise the Credit Reference Agencies to amend your records to show this account as partially settled..."----- Settled, partially settled,... can't they make up their minds??

 

Naughty, naughty BLS / LTSB!!

 

This will be submitted to TS and FSA with a complaint.

 

BLS_offer_1_adulterated.jpg

 

Pete

 

Pete thats an identical letter I got from MBUSA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete thats an identical letter I got from MBUSA

 

Yes, I got a virtually identical letter from MBNA too.

 

I really don't know what makes them think they can get away with such tactics!

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Consumer Direct (Trading Standards) are a complete waste of space!

 

I emailed a complaint about BLS to them yesterday and got this today:

 

Dear Number6,

 

Thank you for your email concerning BLS Collections. Your case number for this is XXXXXXX, which should be quoted in any future contact about this issue.

 

Unfortunately, this is outside the remit of what Trading Standards can enforce as there are regulatory bodies for your enquiry. I would recommend that you forward your complaint to the Financial Services Authority (Financial Services Authority) on 0845 606 1234. You may also wish to complain to the Credit Services Association (Home Page) who regulate debt collection agencies on 0191 286 5656.

 

Regards

Consumer Direct West Midlands

 

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
This is the second letter I have received from BLS collections who are acting as "DCA" on behalf of LTSB cards and who are actually a trading name of LTSB.

 

I replied to the first "standard" collections letter from them with a request for no further contact because LTSB Card Services are in default of my CCA Section 78 Statutory Request.

 

This second letter came anyway and is interesting on two counts:

 

1) BLS suggest using "savings, alternative financing or the help of a family member" to clear the debt!!!

 

2) They are offering a reduced settlement figure [the words used are "....settling your account for a reduced amount"] but then go on to say "On receipt of cleared funds, our Client will advise the Credit Reference Agencies to amend your records to show this account as partially settled..."----- Settled, partially settled,... can't they make up their minds??

 

Naughty, naughty BLS / LTSB!!

 

This will be submitted to TS and FSA with a complaint.

 

BLS_offer_1_adulterated.jpg

 

Pete

 

SNAP - Exactly the words on my one too!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am new to this forum , and I am also subject to the harassment from BLS

I am currently in a debt management program with National Money Helpline , and have passed details over to them , as initially I did send them details of the debt , but for some reason , it didn't get put on the list

 

BLS are now sending me letters , ringing me everyday at work , home and on my mobile , and frankly , it's really getting my back up

 

The issue is being sorted with NMH , but BLS keep insisting on contacting me .

 

Is there anything that can be done to stop this ?

 

PS , Last year I made a successful claim against LTSB (whom BLS are acting for) , but according to my reckoning , the total amount they say I am in debt , still includes said charges

Edited by k6gixer
more to add
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

On the FSA website BLS are not part of Lloyds. I have now asked the FSA to investigate and will do a formal claim.

 

I have also been advised that dont admit to anything - ask for proof - never acknowledge BLS but ask for proof of loan agreements. Remember banks only keep info for 6 years. Without proof they wont win any court cases.

 

Also I asked BLS for copy letters they said they sent - apparently their facility isnt big enough to keep all letters!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been dealing with BLS for a few months now:). They phoned several times a day , which I logged and they ignored my no phone contact messages. I sent 2 phone harassment letters by recorded delivery. The first was re-directed, so I sent the second as a formal complaint to a LTSB Brighton address from the back of their envelopes. I have had no further contact from them since mid September, other than a letter advising me that they have removed my number from their database.

I've just sent a second letter clarfying which accounts I was refering to and advising them that I will be issuing a further formal complaint over their actions once the 40 days for my SAR has passed.

The address I use for BLS is LTSB, PO Box 487, Brighton, BN1 4GH.

Hope this helps.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Just jumping in here.... in debt with Lloyds, business loan over 7 years back, plus they just loaned me more a year later... a seperate loan. went over 30k at one point. Self employed, missed a a few payments, arrears etc.. BLS are now involved. Offered me a settlement figure, on 1st loan its at 10k was offered 5k to clear it... all done over phone.

Basically, with out scrolling thru numerous posts, is this a wise option?

I still have 14k on the other loan too...

 

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

i have just settled my account with bls in person outstanding debt was 7476.30 i offered them 2000 to settle in full they jumped at it that was 3 weeks ago got my comfermation letter and 2000 still in my bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...