Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I am now in receipt of a second Letter of Claim this time from DCBL although their letter head now says " DCBLegal"  😱 Now I'm guessing one response to a letter of claim is sufficient and I could ignore this but having been inspired by other snotty letters I wanted to have another bash at one. How does this sound? Dear Lackeys of Company with Unconscionable Morals, Thank you ever so much for gracing me with yet another Letter Before Claim on behalf of Excel Parking Services. How many of these delightful missives do you plan on sending before you muster the courage to follow through on your threats to take me to court? Just so we're clear, here is the response (in italics by that I mean the slanted text below) I previously sent to Excel’s Letter Before Claim, in case your attention to detail is as lacking as I suspect: I am currently 2-0 up in terms of Small Claims Court proceedings and I look forward to the opportunity to claim a hat trick, this case being more straightforward than my previous two. I will be asking the court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) due to your conduct over this absurd claim. Despite my best efforts, you continue to assert that I have breached your terms. However, I cannot breach terms that I was not present to accept. Have you even read my initial response? I suggest you review it thoroughly and save yourself some money. Additionally, please refer to section 13 of the IPC Code of Practice, 2023 edition. I eagerly await your deafening silence. Remarkably, I haven't heard a peep from Excel since my response; instead, they've passed the baton to you to perform this tiresome routine once more. Consider this my official notice that I am sending a cease and desist letter to Excel Parking Services. Their relentless hounding has crossed the line into clear harassment. Any further demands for payment from you, as Excel's lackeys, will be regarded as nothing more than shameless acts of intimidation and harassment. I now look forward to the deafening sound of your silence. Yours sincerely,
    • Personally I'd go to it and object for the sake of it. They have to attend anyway so I can't see you being liable for any costs or anything (if they try to ask for attendance costs, just say that firstly it is their application, secondly it is from their own making, thirdly that they would have to come anyway so you shouldn't need to bear their costs.   When you turn up you should object on the basis that the witness has been in office since the time of the order, and could have done their witnes statement in advance of their AL. Their poor planning is not your fault, 7 days is too rushed for you as a LIP and there is no good reason that a company can't organise itself to sort WX in time. Also they say finalise so they already have something, its not like thye have nothing. Their amendments cannot be so important if they are being added so late.   see what @AndyOrch says but that's my thoughts  
    • Yes, in the main your understanding of my case is right. Linked below to the post with the final WS sent to the court and to Evri.   
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. As you say, appealing this ticket doesn't help as these people hardly ever accept appeals. They don't care how difficult someone's life is, they just want the money. The forum guys should be along later with thoughts for you on how to deal with this. Best, HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Imminent County Court claim against Evri £600 lost parcel ***Settled in full***


Frooty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Like so many others, Evri lost a parcel I sent during December.

 

It was not delivered to the correct address, a signature wasn't collected, and the recipient never received the parcel.

 

It was worth several hundred pounds. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - many thanks for the reply.

 

I issued a Letter Before Claim on 2nd February to Evri by email and by Recorded Delivery. On the email title I inadvertently called it 'Letter of Claim'. I'm hoping that's not an issue. I addressed it to Evri at Capitol House in Leeds, which I'm hoping is okay too. I'm pretty certain that I'll have many instances of poor or incorrect terminology.

 

I told them I was claiming both the value of the parcel, the postage fee and reserved the right to apply for refund of court costs and any other charges upheld at court if applicable, on the basis that their T's & C's are 'trumped' by the Consumer Rights Act.

 

I advised that I looked forward to hearing from them within the next 28 days - this will end on 2nd March. They did call pretty quickly after receiving the letter, and sent an email on 3rd Feb reiterating that their maximum level of compensation would be £20 (referring to their Ts and Cs) and that they were offering a 'goodwill' payment of £150, which would be their full and final offer and is non-negotiable. I have not yet replied to this, as I have already made it clear that I will accept nothing less that the sum of the value of the parcel plus the postage costs.

 

I think I understand the process, and have read many of what I think are the relevant posts on here, which have been very useful.

 

I am fully prepared to pay the £70 court fees, as I think they should own the issue they created properly and professionally. I'm not a solicitor, but would like to make sure I don't make any mistakes throught this process.

 

For example, in the Letter Before Claim, I gave them 28 days to response.

 

Can I process the Claim via CC now, given their response of the 3rd February, or should I wait until the 3rd March?

 

I'm also keen to establish exactly who I should be claiming against, which I think is EVRi Parcelnet Ltd t/a Evri. (interestingly, I sent an email to the CEO and chairman asking who the claim should be against, and received an email stating that I should continue to communicate with 'Evri Legal Team, Evri 1 Capitol Close.......etc').

 

I don't think I will be claiming against their Legal Team though!!!

 

I'm keen to ensure I have the correct info, the correct replies / responses with Evri, and that any references I make to previous similar cases / judgments (there are two on here that I found) are legitimate.

 

I'm grateful for any assistance, and happy to provide redacted comms if that helps my or anyone else's issues with Evri.

 

Thanks again - I'll happily update on this as I go through the process.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Imminent County Court claim against Evri £600 lost parcel
3 hours ago, Frooty said:

The value of the parcel is £600, evidenced by the sale details. 

from where?

how did you sell this via ebay or alike?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please keep us closely up to dated on the progress of your claim.

I suggest that you post your letter of claim here in PDF format so we can see what you sent them. I also suggest that you open an account with the County Court MoneyClaim website and start drafting your particulars of claim but let us see what you are going to put up before you click it off.

I'm not sure if you have told us whether you bought insurance or not. I gather that you may not have done but please will you clarify.

You only needed to give them 14 days. At the end of that. You could have issued the claim. As they have already not you back, you could drop them a brief note telling them that in view of the fact that they have rejected your claim, that you are proceeding to issue at the end of the 14 days from the date that you send them the letter.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder thanks for the input.

 

When I get the chance I’ll post a redacted copy of the Letter for Claim.

 

I didn’t buy additional insurance, but from what I have read it doesn’t seem to make much odds.

 

As advised, I’ll email them back advising that the CC action will start after 14 days of issue of LfC given their rejection.

 

I’m pretty frustrated with them that they struggle to answer a direct question with an equally direct reply. 


Of course I’d be happy to share draft particulars of claim prior to submission.

 

At the moment the principle of their actions are more important to me than the money, I’m very happy to accept advice and provide details of how things proceed. 


One query if I may

 

- as soon as they received my recipient’s signed Denial of Receipt Letter, they sent me (via PayPal) the £20 compensation.

 

a) I’ve rejected this by email - do I need to ensure I refund them this?

 

b) can I legitimately assume they accept full liability for the parcel loss, given that they have moved to compensate?

 

The aforementioned £150 had been offered as ‘goodwill’, also rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you don't need to refund it. However it would be a good idea to inform them that it is a unilateral payment and that you will simply be deducting the sum from your eventual claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I think that although we have in the past been advising people to go to mediation, I notice that today somebody has reported a successful judgement in the County Court after a trial and that they had refused mediation.

I think we may start advising people that this is a reasonable course to take. It is clear that EVRi are simply wasting taxpayers money by putting their legitimate customers through a mediation process in order to discourage them.

It's about time that we started aggressively collecting judgements.

We have just been told that there is a 4th  judgement and I am trying to contact the Cagger @Giraphen88 in order to get a copy.  They haven't responded so far but I do hope that they appreciate that we are a community and that we need to share these things for the good of others who are in the same difficulty and are also looking for the free help that we give

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please find attached the redacted LfC.

I note on re-reading that I mistakenly copied an Evri email, rather than my refusal of their offer. I'm not certain it's important given that they have the email and have acknowledged it by restating their full and final offer.

 

I attach also the two judgements (elsewhere on this forum) that I considered were relevant to this matter.

 

I'll get on an open an account with the County Court MoneyClaim.

 

OT APPROVED, MTILLYER, H5QZ25Q7, TILLYER, PARCELHERO, 25.05.22 (KUT) - J v4.pdfOT APPROVED, PPENCHEV, 225MC852, PENCHEV, PARCEL2GO, 07.02.22 (CL) - J v4c.pdf

 

.LbC 020323 redacted.pdf


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok sorted now

 

didnt realise they were judgements here

i hope the people are ok with their details in the open forum.

sorry didnt realise

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the letter of claim.

Extremely wordy and mostly unnecessary – but anyway it will do. Also, completely unnecessary to give and 28 days. Where did you get that from?

As already suggested, – you should consider sending them a modifying message telling them that the claim will be issued on day 14.

I suggest that you are a bit more careful with your reading sending get things right. It doesn't look good for you and it doesn't help in the long term

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the constructive criticism. I got the LfC template from here 

WWW.WHICH.CO.UK

If you're considering court action, a letter before claim must be sent to the party you're taking to court. Use this Which? template letter to help you.

which contains the 28 days reference. 

 

I'll send Evri an updated message advising that the claim will be issued on day 14 and 

Out of curiosity and for future reference, which elements of the LfC were unneccesary? I'm afraid I've never had to claim against anyone previously.

 

I'll get on with opening a County Court MoneyClaim account tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that which for you.

 

its 14 days letter of claim<< click and read.

nothing there in the govt docs say letter before claim, but it's just silly semantics anyway.

 

simply type in evri here.

there are 100's of claims to read.

 

dx

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that you only cause yourself difficulties by trying to get assistance from multiple sources .

Not only that, I suspect that you don't even particularly understand most of the things which have been said in the letter which you have sent .

Decide where you are going to get your help from and stick to that. Otherwise they will just be confusion and errors

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've advised Evri that given their confirmation of refusal to repay the full amount following my Letter of Claim, I have advised them that I intend to submit a CC claim on 16th Feb. I've created an account on MCOL and have prepped the Particulars of Claim as follows.

Quote

 

"I used the defendant’s courier service to deliver an item with value £600 to a UK address. Tracking reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

The item was not delivered to the recipient.

 

The defendants have refused to compensate me fully as I did not pay for additional insurance. The defendant’s requirement that the customer is responsible for insuring themselves against the negligence of courier employees is unfair within the meaning of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and is therefore unenforceable.

 

The claimant asks the court to note that the defendants' attempt to sell additional insurance cover for the items they have already contracted to deliver is effectively an attempt to sell me rights which I already enjoy as a matter of right under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.


Therefore, the defendant is committing a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and specifically paragraph 10 schedule 1 of those regulations


"Presenting rights given to consumers in law as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer."

 

EVRi Parcelnet Ltd t/a Evri has already unilaterally refunded £20 without my approval so I have excluded that from my claim.

 

I am seeking £580 + interest + court fees of £70"

 

 

I intend to press submit on 16th. Any views welcomed.

Edited by BankFodder
edits in red
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are talking about an online form here. Simply type your name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, when you eventually get to the stage where you need to consider choosing mediation, I suggest you consider the comments which I have made on this thread:

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification - at the top of this page the form asks

You are required to give details of your claim in the box below. If you wish, you may also send detailed particulars direct to the defendant. If you need to do this, please tick here

 

Am I correct in assuming I needn't bother ticking this on the basis that I've already given them a load of info, which will be distilled in due course through the process?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right. Your cause of action is adequately described in your claim form as it stands. No need to complicate things by feeding them a load more staff which they will ignore anyway.

Keep your claim to a minimum and let them go into any detail they want – although it will be a standard defence and it will be meaningless.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to suggest some changes to your particulars of claim.

Suggested changes are in red in your particulars of claim post above

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...