Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DUBAI Debt (From 2014) - Letter from JMR Solicitors - resident in scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Happy New Year

 

Its been a while since  I last had an issue with one of these Companies

 

but late December 2022  I received a nice little letter from a DCA called jmr Solicitors who are acting on behalf of a UAE Bank

 

The alleged debt is a credit card. I do wonder how they got my address as I moved to Scotland last year.  Left Dubai 2014

 

I haven't updated the alleged BANK in UAE with my current address. 

 

Previously I was harassed by Moriarty Law and after sending a CAA letter to them I never heard back (Approx 2x years ago)

 

CCA Information was taken from here

 

Question 1 : What are my valid next steps?

 

Question 2: Does it matter that I live in Scotland?

 

 

Any advice appreciated on this one

 

Thanks

 

Jolly Rodger

 

================================

DCA Letter

 

LETTER OF CLAIM

Amount Due: Outstanding debt in the sum of AEDXXXXXX

 

We are instructed on behalf of the above mentioned client to pursue you for immediate

payment of the outstanding amount owed to them.

 

We have been advised that the amount outstanding is AEDXXXXXX which has arisen from a financial product that you took out with our client.

 

We are in receipt of your signed agreement which constituted a binding contract between yourself and our client.

 

You have failed to honour your part of the agreement which has lead to our client appointing us with instructions to issue legal

proceedings against yourself.

 

This letter is being sent to you in accordance with Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct

and Protocols (the Pre-Action PD) contained in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR).

 

In particular we refer you to paragraphs 13 to 16 of the Pre-Action PD Concerning the Courts power to impose sanctions failing to comply with its provisions.

 

We refer you to the Practice Direction (Pre-Action Protocols) in particular paragraph 15 and

the sanctions for non compliance.

 

You can find there on the Ministry of Justice website at:

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd pre-action conduct

 

Our client has demanded payment in full, failing which we will have no option but to pursue

the same via the Courts.

 

There would appear to be no reason why this sum should not be paid immediately as it is

your outstanding liability and is overdue for repayment.

 

We have been provided with

sufficient documents in support of the same and will provide copies to the Courts should the

need arise.

 

We would be grateful if you would contact us as a matter of urgency to discuss settlement

of the outstanding amount.

 

We respectfully suggest that it is in your interest if you contact

us on receipt of this letter as it will help us in enabling a swift negotiated settlement to be

reached and it will avoid any further interest accruing on your outstanding debt.

 

Please note as this is a commercial debt we reserve the right to claim statutory interest at the rate of 8% from the date that the debt becomes overdue.

 

We are entitled to claim any subsequent rate 

when the Bank of England reference rate changes and the debt remains unpaid in

accordance with the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2002.

 

Please note we

are also entitled to claim compensation in the sum of £40 for any unpaid debts up to

£999.99.

 

In addition to the above, please note that a travel ban may be put into place and INTERPOL

may be notified of the debt being pursued against you.

 

You may be at risk of being arrested,

questioned and detained if you choose to travel from this point onwards.

 

To avoid this

please contact us immediately.

We now provide you with the opportunity to amicably resolve this matter by contacting us

on 0161 491 3933 or [email protected] to arrange repayment of your debt.

 

If we do not hear from you within 14 days of this letter, we have been instructed to

commence legal proceedings against you.

 

 

If for any reason you dispute the claim being made against you, please provide us with

details so that we may investigate this matter further.

 

Please note all communication in relation to this matter should be in writing quoting the

above reference number or by telephone using the contact details above.

 

Yours Faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA (Consumer Credit Agreement Request section 78) is not applicable to this debt nor is it covered by the Consumer Credit Act.

I'm not sure why they are referring to interest applicable as a commercial debt in accordance with the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2002.)

 

Was this a business credit card?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

another worthy point is you are resident in Scotland.

 

there have been no scottish UAE claims as the rules on jurisdiction are slightly diff.

 

this could be fun.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to DUBAI Debt (From 2014) - Letter from JMR Solicitors - resident in scotland
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...