Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
    • https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/new-private-parking-code-to-launch-in-the-uk-later-this-year/ The newly created gov petition 'Immediately Reintroduce Private Parking Code of Practice' is from Stanley Luckhurst, the 85-year-old old Excel Parking took to court. Excel lost the case and the pensioner's been campaigning for regulation of PPCs since this unpleasant experience. https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/24085471.gerrards-cross-pensioner-takes-nightmarish-private-parking/ I would urge anyone on this forum who supports the petition statement "We believe the private parking industry is trending toward anarchy and must be brought to order by re-launching the Government Code immediately" to sign and share it. 168 signings at 4pm today https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/660922 If the gov new parking code is not launched before parliament dissolves (for the general election) then the legislation is at great risk of being shelved. And we'll be stuck with ATAs new joint code which does not address motorists issues such as a cap on parking charges, debt recovery or an independent appeal process.  https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/wash-up/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evri lost and damaged 2 phones worth +£500 - court claim issued **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just wondering if anyone can help.

I sent two items with Evri a couple of weeks back (two mobile phones).

The one item was shown as delivered, however, the recipient did not receive the item (the recipient is a friend and is trustworthy).

I clicked on “proof of delivery” and the only thing shown was a GPS image of the location that I sent the item to but nothing more. 

The second item is saying that “item has been damaged beyond repair in transit” but they haven’t given me any further details.

I have tried to contact Evri regarding this but it seems impossible to speak to anyone either online or on the telephone. 

I believe these items were on Evri’s “non-compensation” list so I’m just wondering if there’s anything that can be done at all.

hey are worth around £500 so it’s a lot of money to lose out on.

Any help/advice would be very much appreciated. 

Regards. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can get your money back for both lost parcels .

We will help you .

Please spend at least a day and maybe more for reading lots of the stories on the subform and you will soon understand how it all works and what the principles are .

When you think you understand the way forward then come back here and we will guide you through the process

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Evri lost and damaged 2 phones worth +£500

Hello BankFodder,

 

A lot of information to digest in the forum but I believe I now get the gist of it. 
 

Please can you take a look at my Letter of Claim and let me know if you believe it to be satisfactory: 

Quote

 

LETTER OF CLAIM

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am writing to make a complaint regarding two items that were sent using your courier service:  

 

The first item is a mobile phone with a value of £370. Tracking number = ****************. The item was declared as “delivered” however, the recipient did not receive the item. The “proof of delivery” was also unacceptable as it only displayed a GPS location image and nothing more which I do not accept to be a “PROOF” of delivery. 

 

The second item is also a mobile phone with a value of £120. Tracking number = ***************. The item was declared as being “damaged beyond repair in transit” however, you have not provided any evidence that my item has been damaged or offered to return the item back to me which, again, is not acceptable. Even if the item has been damaged, the item is my property and should have been returned back to me. 

 

You have stated that these particular items are under the “non-compensation” list, however, under the Consumer Rights Acts 2015 this is regarded as treating a customer “unfairly” and, as a courier service, you have a duty of responsibility to provide a “satisfactory” service to consumers. 

 

Bearing these things in mind, I am seeking compensation from you for the value of both items:

 

£370 + £120 = £490 

 

Plus postage costs: £3.29 + £3.29 = £6.58 

 

Total compensation = £496.58 

 

If full compensation is not received by the 1st February 2023 then I will be escalating the matter to a Court Claim

 

Yours sincerely,

 

**** ********

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but you clearly haven't fully done your reading .

Where items are damaged and then apparently destroyed without your permission, it requires an additional approach .

Please continue reading and check back tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read some of the posts hence why I learned about the Letter of Claim that needs to be sent to the courier.

There is a huge amount of posts in regards to the courier company Evri and I am trying my best to juggle multiple responsibilities at the moment.

I didn’t mention anything about my goods being disposed of. All I’ve been told is that my parcel has been damaged beyond repair but they haven’t supplied me with any evidence regarding this and I’m finding it impossible to speak to an Evri representative.

If you could direct me to the page/post that will assist me in the additional approach that you say I will need concerning damaged goods it would be much appreciated. 

Regards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I will not be able to direct you to the particular post. But there are several threads dealing with damaged property which then apparently is lost .

It is clear but if they inform you that property is damaged, but they know where it is and who it belongs to .

This means that you should also be suing them for the retention of your property .

I'm sorry that you are in a position where you are juggling several responsibilities at the same time .

You should understand that we are ordinary people as well and we also have our various responsibilities which we are trying to juggle .

We are offering a free service in our own time and which is highly effective and with much better results than resolver or citizens advice etc .

None of us get paid and I'm afraid that we expect people who come to us for help also to help themselves.

 The end of the day, by empowering yourself you will become stronger and more confident about what you are doing.

This will help you win

Link to post
Share on other sites

 I will try to locate those particular posts on damaged goods and come back tomorrow.

I do appreciate you giving your time to help others with a free service.

I would gladly donate to this organisation if you are able to assist me in receiving compensation for my losses. 

 

Regards 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

use our enhanced google search box.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks I will do some further reading up on Evri

Could I just ask do the same rules apply with Royal Mail?

I posted two mobile phones recently with them and they have also gone missing.

They are worth around £700 in total,

however, I only sent with 1st class signed for which offers a maximum compensation of £50.

I just wondered if they would also be liable to give full compensation for loss of items. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

create a new topic please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

open

please update this thread now you are back.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mans1910 said:

I ended up making a Court Claim against them and was able to get most of my money back, after a long drawn out process.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Evri lost and damaged 2 phones worth +£500 - court claim issued **RESOLVED**
  • dx100uk locked this topic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...