Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evri - The parcel(s) went missing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evri undoubtedly have had a surge of demand following Royal Mail strike action. The mark of a good business is having adequate contingencies to cope with demand - and - it being Christmas time, that demand surely was expected?
Evri / EVRi has a very long track record of poor customer service it would seem from searching on Google. It is fair to say, that such a business model presents significant challenges - however - it would appear, the challenges faced are not handled well at all.

 

Background

I've sent multiple packages via Evri. I'm focussing on two that haven't arrived. My approach is differing from most complaints in a few aspects. 

 

I have been unable to engage well with Evri as their points of contact are overwhelmed, or non functional.

 

Letter

 

EVRi Parcelnet Limited
Capitol House
1 Capitol Close
Morley
Leeds
West Yorkshire
LS27 0WH

                                                                                                **************
                                                                                                *********
                                                                                                *******
                                                                                                *******
                                                                                                *******@****************.com

20 DECEMBER 2022

Re:
P1 – COMPLAINT – STANDARDS & PROCEDURES
P2 – NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM

In regards to:
****************** – ******** / SENT ON 02/12/22 – STATED AS DELAYED 05/12/22
Contents: Apple Airpods / Second user / EBay item: 255844733492 / Sale value: £142

****************** – ******** / SENT ON 08/12/22 – STATED ‘SORTING AT HUB’ 10/12/22
Contents: Tokens / New / EBay item: 255853294725 / Sale Value £10

 

P1 – COMPLAINT – STANDARDS & PROCEDURES

I have found it challenging to engage with your company to highlight missing items. All avenues to address any issues result in a ‘closed loop’ of automation with no avenue for address:

An example of your online counter intuitive website process is:
Google Search – Evri Complaints
Evri – How do I complain about your services > Contact Friendly Customer Service Team > It’s something else > Start a Chat > Enter Parcel Tracking details > Parcel has been delayed > Do you want to track another item?

 

There is no option to speak to an advisor.

 

An example of your telephone automated process is:
0300 808 5456 > Enter tracking Number (Number of missing item entered) > “No Description found for tracking point”

 

There is no option to speak to an advisor.

 

If a tracking number of a DELIVERED item is entered, an option is given to speak to an advisor, followed by the message “Sorry, there are too many people in the que”.

 

An extensive search through google provides very few answers of how to reach out to you, however, a very many websites with worrying information can be found on your company about poor customer services, missing packages (in particular) and many many news articles, including photographs of the treatment of packages, and accusations of theft.

 

My findings have left me feeling that you are very much in reproach of best practice examples for customer service.

Absolutely no consideration is taken for those with enhanced needs, and those who may struggle under adequate circumstances to contact you.

 

I have found the entire process of searching to be exceptionally time consuming, and impactive on my otherwise strong mental health.

 

One of my potential solutions came from a public forum with the email address for your CEO. I have not had a response.

 

I also found ‘Resolver’, a third party complaints website, as a way to contact you, where someone replied that I should contact ‘The Sender’. To clarify, I am the Sender, but, regardless, I was told to speak to myself about the matter. It has seemed I’ve done nothing but for the last week.

 

This is unacceptable, and for clarification, I must ask you, is this process (or lack of) by design? Is it your intent to make post order contact challenging?

 

P2 – NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM

I used your services under the abovementioned reference numbers, ordered directly on your website, labels printed on my printer. Your ‘Next Day’ service is frequently used, my learning has been that 'Next Day' is unlikely to be delivered any quicker than standard.

 

My packages are always ‘Over Packed’, meaning, an excessive level of bubble wrap is used, an excessive level of pallet wrap, thick tape over the entirety of the package to avoid a label coming free, Invoice with return details are within each package.

 

The packages were dropped off at the parcel shop and entrusted into your system.

 

Both stated packages have now stagnated, and, I believe it is a safe assumption, they will not arrive.

 

In the case of the more expensive of items, the buyer has been refunded their full amount automatically by EBay as I am unable to provide progression on the status of their item delivery.

 

I claim that you now owe me £152. As the value is low, I am willing to accept this as a credit to my account against future postage costs.

 

If I do not receive a satisfactory response from you within 14 days from this letter, I will initiate legal proceedings against you in the County Court without any further notice, I will also consider claiming costs at this stage.

 

Sincerely

*********************

 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Draft. I'm very far from an expert at this. Mental Health is my speciality (to which this has had an impact dealing with the eBay side of things)

 

Any input is most welcome.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send that letter.

It's far too wordy. It's almost impossible to understand and you will be better making much shorter messages using simple English.

I hope you don't mind me asking – whether English is your first language?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I was thinking to keep it more simple. Just really angry at them.

 

You are possibly the first to ever pick up ever  English is not my first language! 

 

I even sound English, ish, with a lisp! 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect that others were simply too polite to point it out to you.

Have you done the reading around this sub- forum at the enormous number of EVRi stories that we have? If you haven't then that's the place to start. Make yourself thoroughly familiar with the way that these cases go, the principles involved, and also the letters that we write.

Draft an initial letter of complaint, keep it straightforward and to the point and stop trying to use grandiose language. Post it here and we will have a look

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Bank. Yes, I had a look.
I'm all for driving to their head office. Sick of poor standards. Will review and re write.

 

More needs to be done really.

That Comfy seat should be in a tank, blocking their car park entrance.

 

But many companies are likewise to this. It's dreadful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...