Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all, I say all! Bazza you do seem to take great blithe pleasure in offending someone you’ve never even met before. I can confirm i’m not an ‘OP’, which I presume is short-form for ‘Old Person’! Well I guess my positive spin on events will have to be consigned to landfill and I am just going to have to go with the general consensus  landslide of opinion and pay it then. Fiddlesticks. Another little piece of soul given to an organisation I find anathema to me - that’s what hurts the most [starts sobbing]. Oh well, could be worse I guess I could a Man City fan defending the indefensible! Thanks again.
    • You will receive a Notice of Judgment with details of the judgment and payment details
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. It would be a good idea for you to read other shoplifting threads here to get an idea of how this works. The police won't get involved now, so no chance of arrest. You need to avoid that branch of John Lewis for a while though. Basically, John Lewis's security people will give your details to either a firm like Retail Loss prevention or DWF solicitors who will then write to you with scary-sounding letters to frighten you into paying them some kind of penalty. They have no legal power and can't take you to court, only John Lewis can. Last time we saw a retailer in court against shoplifters, it went very badly for them and we haven't seen a case like that since - over 10 years ago. But you need to figure out why you did this. If you need support, talk to your GP and aske them. They will have heard it all before and won't judge you. Best, HB  
    • In addition to the information you've been given above, I suggest that you spend some time reading up on the stories on this sub- forum. There is a lot of information about suing as an entitled third-party. Take a couple of days – and by Monday you will be much more confident. More in control and you will have fewer questions to ask but the questions that you do think up will probably be more relevant and more interesting to your case. Do the reading. This is always an essential first step   Additionally please can you give us more details. What was the item, was it correctly declared, was the value correctly declared, what was the value that was declared? Very importantly what date did you send it?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A Tale of Two Payments?


Nigel Willetts
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have trawled through the postings to determine if anybody else has had an experience similar to mine, but have yet to find such a person. Please advise, if you can, on my particular scenario with HSBC:

 

Letter received on 21/11/06 from DG Solicitors informing of intention to repay full charges, without prejudice.

 

Letter received on 24/11/06 informing me that my account has been credited with full amount. This was not what I requested in my claim, I specifically requested payment to be made in the form of a personal cheque.

 

A variety of telephone calls to DG Solicitors and HSBC resulted in a personal cheque being issued on Monday 11/12/06, which was paid into my Nat West account on Tuesday 12/12/06.

 

Friday 15/12/06, I received a letter from County Court, advising that the time for my defendants to file their defences has now elapsed. I was sent an allocation questionnaire to complete, requesting a further fee of £100, to be completed by 02/01/07.

 

This morning, Saturday 16/12/06, Nat West informed me that HSBC have instructed them not to honour the cheque! As it is Saturday, I cannot contact either HSBC or DG solicitors to determine why.

 

So, from 21/11/06 to present, I am no further on in retrieving my money. My family and I were heavily dependent upon such money to fund Christmas for our three children.

 

It looks like I will be the test case, which I am more than happy to take on. Has anybody else had a similar experience of a cheque being issued, and then withdrawn? Can anybody else please advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The funds deposited were due to be cleared at the close of trading Friday. Nat West informed me this morning (saturday) that the cheque (and subsequent funds) were returned to HSBC via the Nat West fraud department, on the advice of HSBC. So I am back to square one and will need to pursue through courts once again. In a perverse way, I would love to take my case to Court and be responsible for opening the floodgates!

 

Any one else experiencing similar?

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop, hold the panic. i think, although i've no basis for this, just throwing this out there - i think they are reacting to the possibility of paying it twice - sort of left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. you got it into an account - their error -you wanted a cheque, so, at this point when you were talking to them - what happened to the money they had put into your account?

 

leave the a.q. and all talk of further action to the side for the moment -

i think you are sorted - it's a misunderstanding of where the money went.

 

so, if we are to sort it out logically - what happened to the money in the account.

 

i think perhaps you won't be able to sort this with hsbc today - although you could try one of the 800 numbers - i think you need to lay it out - then send your summary to dg, e-mail it to them as well and then call them first thing monday a.m. i think it will get sorted.

 

did you move the money in your account, did they take it back or is it still there?

you won't be a test case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that post number 4 was from me (lateralus).

i advised nigel to start his own thread where he would get more exposure and more help. also told him to cut and paste the relevant postings.

just in case anybody thought nigel was having a really off day talking to himself.................... so, anybody else????? to calm his jangled nerves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this was the last post before he started his own thread:

 

 

 

#37 (permalink) Nigel Willetts vbmenu_register("postmenu_436501", true);

Basic Account Customer

 

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 9

reputation_pos.gif

 

 

icon1.gif Re: Hsbc To Defend!!!!!

Thanks for all who took the time to post response. I feel a little easier now. lateralus, I think that you might be correct in your assumption that they are possibly reacting to paying the money twice. As for money in the account, I have no way of knowing what has happened to it - I have not used the account for years and have since forgotten passwords etc for on line banking to check. Will create a new thread. Many thanks.

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("436501") report.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contacted the Bank first thing this morning and they were quite helpful. They can see no reason for why this has happened, are investigating this morning, and have promised me an answer later this morning. They did say that the initial sum of money paid into my account was subsequently withdrawn upon issue of the cheque. Strange! Will keep you updated as and when I hear anything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contacted the Bank first thing this morning and they were quite helpful. They can see no reason for why this has happened, are investigating this morning, and have promised me an answer later this morning. They did say that the initial sum of money paid into my account was subsequently withdrawn upon issue of the cheque. Strange! Will keep you updated as and when I hear anything!

 

Probably a case of one not knowing whta the other is doing. Hope its sorted today for you.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Numerous telephone calls to HSBC, with promises of return calls which have not materialised. Apparently, so they claim, two cheques were sent out to me. One on 30th November, which I never received, and one on 7th. December, which I did receive and presented to my bank. Would you believe that this is the cheque thay they cancelled, rather than the one allegedly sent on 30th. November?

 

I am trying to arrange a direct bank transfer from HSBC to my current account, in light of their monumental cock ups! Do you think that they will/should agree to this? Otherwise, there is no hope of me receiving the money before Christmas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think they owe you an apology for besmurching your name with natwest.

the very least they can do is expedite the money! now natwest thinks you are involved with bank fraud. (i don't think they would really think this - it's just a little paranoia to feed hsbc). good luck - you'll get there - hopefully sooner rather than later - call them again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mammie L - whats all this, besmurch + expedite, big words.....on a monday......I ask you, where will it end?! :p

Prelim sent to HSBC 10/10/2006 for £5035

no response :x

LBA sent 24/10/2006

no response :x

MCOL filed 10/11/2006 :eek:

MCOL issued 13/10/2006

HSBC acknowledged MCOL 17/11/2006

HSBC entered defence + case transferred 12/12/06 :mad:

FULL OFFER! Received today 14/12/06 :D

 

If I have been of assistance, please tip my scales but don't forget, this is only my personal opinion, I'm no legal eagle!

 

Please sign this petition:

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/PAYUSBACK/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I have been telephoning HSBC since 9.00am this morning and still await a return call from them at time of writing - 4.00pm. Whenever I call, I have to explain my situation over and over again and the poor person on the other end of the telephone informs me that they will speak to their 'specialist' department who will telephone me straight away. I still await such a call. Another day wasted. Off to try again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens! It transpires that somebody at NatWest has deemed it appropriate to stop the transfer of funds. HSBC are totally innocent and assure me that they had no involvement or reason to stop the cheque, or the payment. Nat West are a little jittery and are launching a full investigation tomorrow. They can see no reason for this cause of action.

 

Through this action group, I managed to obtain details of and speak to the PA of Sir Freddie Goodwin, top man at Nat West, who was most helpful and promised an investigation from their end. Something a little shady going on here, me thinks. watch this space!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is total and utter nonsense from HSBC, NatWest have paid the cheque in and sent it to clearing and HSBC has stated that a stop is on the cheque, NatWest do not stop a cheque drawn on another bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is very interesting! Guess I will have to wait to see how this scenario develops, but I cannot quite see the logic in HSBC doing this. The guy who I last spoke to at HSBC sounded quite sincere and genuine, and requested that I obtain particular information from Nat West pertaining to cheque number and reason for not clearing cheque so that he could investigate from his end. As far as he was concerned, there was no issue with this cheque clearing and he was quite adamant that they had not put a stop on it.

 

If, as you say, this is not the case, what course of action can I take against HSBC with regard to their handling of this?

 

This is really beginning to wear me down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest will be able to tell you why the cheque was not paid but they would have had no hand in it being stopped as the cheque would have been drawn on HSBC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another day wasted! I cannot believe that it takes so long to trace a cheque. HSBC still claiming their innocence, with Nat West still 'investigating'. With all this technology at their disposal, surely it should not take this long! Looking highly unlikely that it will be resolved in time for Christmas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps NatWestStaffMember may be able to shed a little light on today's events. Apparently, an employee at Nat West clearing centre in Edinburgh took it upon themselves to check the validity of the cheque issued by HSBC! Nat West have my money and I would like it back. I intend to involve banking ombudsman when resolved and to close my account with Nat West, then claim bank charges back from them! Another wasted day! Looks like I will have to cancel Christmas this year!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the cheque had a stop on it then NatWest had no hand in it being stopped. Can you clairfy that it was stopped ie paid into your account and then withdrawn? If yes then you would have had notification by NatWest of this in the post. If on the statement it says cheque unpaid and a reference number on the statement then the branch should be able to call with that reference and find out the reason for a stop on the cheque, if it is still clearing then it has not been stopped. I need more details as to the why and what info on clearing employee in Edinburgh, am assuming you are in Scotland, as there are a number of clearing centres around the UK not just where RBS are based

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...