Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
    • CCA to debt purchaser pap reply to sols with copy of CCA letter included  all as per post 2 in letter of claim thread 
    • If I go to court to defend my claim and will will my licence be unrevoked automatically?
    • Does this mean my driving licence is void now? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance policy "incorrect" after claim, told the premium has doubled with Insure4boats


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a small boat kept at my local marina, insured with insure4boats.

 

I made a claim after an incident in mid-July, & asked that the claim be fast-tracked as the boat is unusable until it's repaired. The premium paid was around the £140.00 mark.

 

I was contacted by Insure4boats earlier this week, & informed that the policy I have is incorrect, as it is for "inland use." I had called them back in June to query the policy wording, as the Marina is situated on a Tidal river, & this seemed incorrect. I was advised on the phone "this is a wording issue, the policy you have is correct." 

 

They are now demanding a further payment of £138.00, & said they will continue to "consider my claim" once this payment is made. This would make the whole premium around £280.00 for this year.

 

I have just ran through a comparison site, where the cheapest premium is £196.00 for the year, & the most expensive £281.00, on a like-for-like basis. had I been quoted this amount back in June, I certainly wouldn't have used them. I have emailed them, telling them I'm not prepared to pay this further amount, & had no response back.

 

Can anybody advise on this,

I'm prepared to go to the Insurance Ombudsman, & if necessary to the small-claims track of the county court, or MCOL, both to recover the money paid for incorrect insurance policies over the past 3 years, & also to force them to honour the claim made.

 

I am now minded to cancel the policy altogether with them, & seriously regret having any dealings with insure4boats.

 

On the Policy schedule, it clearly states "If any of the details are incorrect or have changed please contact us immediately by telephone 0800 668 1661". This is exactly what I did, to query the "inland, non-tidal" aspect of the policy wording. I was assured this was not an issue, clearly by somebody who actually had no idea.

 

They were provided the name & Location of the Marina when the policy was taken out, & the fact it was situated on a tidal river in England. They now claim "I took out the wrong policy". 

 

I am extremely unhappy about this situation, & would appreciate any advice you can give. 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

please up a corrected version and we will swap.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the value of the claim ?

 

I would suggest that you pay the additional premium and have the claim processed, But when you pay the addiitional amount, state that it is being paid under protest and that you will referring the matter to the FOS. Ask them if they will send their complaints final decision letter stating the amount of £138 is due, stating the reasons for this, so that the matter may be escalated to the FOS without delay,

 

And I would suggested sending a Data protection subject access request to get hold of records. Do you have proof that they told you the policy you had was ok for the boats location ?

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thx unclebulgaria, I've been away for a few weeks - the claim value is around the £1200 mark. I have already made the additional payment over the phone to them, however the claim has still not been settled. The season is essentially over now, I won't be taking any further insurance out  with Insure4Boats/Ripe, it's just ridiculous that it's taken this amount of time. 

 

I don't have proof that they said it was "just a wording issue" to quote them, as I had called them on the phone to query this. I now wish I had emailed, as I would have a copy of their response to refer to. 

 

I didn't mention "payment under protest" during the call, would it be best to email them making them aware of this?  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chase up payment of the claim and register complaint about the issue saying you have paid the extra amount under protest, but would look to involve the FOS in reviewing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...