Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GroupNexus ANPR PCN - Overstay - opps moved now have default judgement - Luton Retail Park LU1


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 311 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear lovely helpful people,

 

You have helped my anxiety in the past with a parking charge and now, unfortunately, I have been charged again.

 

This time, firstly, it was a sincere mistake - I have been shopping with my partner for more than the "allowed 3 hours (that I have not noticed while rushing to the shops)".

 

We had to do a couple of returns, shop a lot for a new flat and the time just flew.

Secondly, we are currently living in a shared house and the letters are randomly picked by either one of us or our housemates.

I have just found this letter (parking charge) in a massive pile of letters that, I presume, one of my housemate placed under the stairs and forgot to mention it.

 

I am so scared that the 14 days period has passed and now I need to fork out £100, money that I definitely do not have to give GroupNexus in these dire economic times.

 

Please, advise if there is anything I could do. I will attach a photo of the charge below. Many thanks in advance!

 

 

 

groupnexus ANPR PCN.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

My first thought is to contact the retail park and try to get them to call the fleecers off.

 

I've looked at their website  https://lutonretailpark.co.uk/contact#contactUs  and unhelpfully there is no e-mail address, just the damn contact form all these companies have.

 

The snail-mail address corresponds to a shopping centre in the centre of Nottingham that I know well, presumably both are owned by the same group.

 

I would (a) fill in their contact form and ask for an e-mail address for customer services, and presuming they cooperate, (b) e-mail them and explain what you've explained above, include receipts and proof of purchase, just lay it on thick about being a genuine customer - and demand they call their dogs off.

 

This might fail miserably, but then nothing ventured ...

Edited by FTMDave
Typo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to GroupNexus ANPR PCN - Overstay - Luton Retail Park LU1

Quick update: On PPP, I've been advised to post this at their address, what are your thoughts about it? Just asking for a second opinion, as I have no knowledge of these kind of laws.

 

"Dear Sirs,

I have received your Notice to Keeper xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx

You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 namely, but not limited to, failing to give notice of keeper liability as prescribed by section 9 (2) (f) of the Act. You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.

There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.

I do not expect to hear from you again, or your debt collectors, except to confirm that no further action will be taken on this matter and my personal details have been removed from your records.

Yours etc"

Edited by TamerAM
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received a letter of claim?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh?  Advised by who?

 

If you start sending letters quoting laws that you admit you have no knowledge of, what do you expect to happen?

 

I've just read the section of POFA that you refer to and the company have, more or less, followed the law.

 

That's not the main point however, you're dealing with charlatans who aren't going to back down due to some technicality.

 

We have a Group Nexus case at the minute where a driver stayed for a quarter of an hour in a car park with an hour and a half's maximum stay.  Group Nexus lied and said the limit was only an hour and started a court case on that basis.  Fortunately the Cagger had prepared well, showed them up as liars, and won the case.  But that's the sort of vermin you're dealing with.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

then why are you sending that rubbish and playing your cards early.

thats not what we advised you to do....

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know what PPP stands for but they have wrongly advised you about your PCN. It was issued at an airport that is covered by Bye Laws which as it is not relevant land, PoFA cannot be used. Group Nexus are in fact to be commended for the fact that they didn't claim you were liable under Sch. 4 s9 [2][f]. Many of the crooks do-are you listening VCS?

 

You are best not to contact them at all as you may reveal who was driving. At the moment they do not know who was driving-you, your partner or someone else, so difficult for them to know who to take to Court.

Edited by lookinforinfo
clarification
Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

luton retail park anpr pcn....:wave:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

open

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear fellow CAG lifesavers,

I will start by thanking you deeply for all your help, advice and support offered throughout the times.

I find myself, again, in a struggle with this damn PCN. 

I moved address 4 months ago, as a tenant. Yesterday, my previous landlord called me saying that there are some letters in my name still at the old address.

One of them was this Claim Form...

I have never dealt with this in my life, I am really scared this will affect my whole financial situation.

Could you, please, advise on what I should do?

It has been a long time since this was sent to the old address, as far as I can see on the Claim Form and I just found it yesterday.

Please, tell me there is something that I could do, at least.

 Many thanks in advance, as usual and I hope you are all well and healthy!

 

claimform 11-05-23.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you change address details promptly on your V5c?

Also was there a letter of claim from the fleecers among the mail?

Edited by Nicky Boy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently at work, I will check all the letters I got yesterday - from the back of my mind, I can't recall seeing anything from the fleecers.

I have, but I originally forgot to update it as soon as I moved and I updated it after ~1-1.5 months. It is my first ever car, and my first address move while having a car - I had no idea what the process is.

I only updated my DL as soon as I moved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was V5c updated BEFORE 11th May? If so how long before?

 

Not sure if you're out of time to respond to Court papers. Hopefully others will advise soon.

Edited by Nicky Boy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll need to ring either Northampton or the court the case was allocated to, [I'm not sure which] assuming it went that way. Perhaps you could check your paperwork for the court allocating the case locally?

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you are really really lucky

you could already have a default judgement.

 

easy to find out and if you dont , then you might be able to save this.

look at the claimform front page. find the password in the information box then:...

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website 

using the details required from the claimform

.goto the claim history section and tell me what it says please.

 

now on the address change.

it doesnt matter you didnt update cars V5C , that will make no odds to this as they do not and cannot recheck with DVLA to check address before issuing the claim, they can legally issue it to the old one.

have you also from your landlord another letter about 6weeks before the claim entitled letter of claim?

get on mcol NOW.

we can sort this today if it allows you to enter a defence which we have ready

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, to everyone.

@dx100uk you are a star, as always, thank you, deeply. It seems there is a judgement passed on the 5th June. I have never seen/dealt with this before. I am really scared now. What can I do....

I am at work until 6pm today and I need to get back home and check every single letter.

Capture.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH its gonna be far cheaper and simpler to pay this off by 4th july.

you could start the process of a set aside by using an N244 form, but you've not really got any defence as any paperwork 'wriggles' are nulled by the judgement, and anyway that will cost you £275+ and has zero guarantee of being successful.

paying the judgement within 30 days will removed the CCJ 100%.

it  urks me with the history you have here that you let this happen...:frusty: you are not a virgin when it comes to speculative invoices...

now just another point.

i hope you've written to ALL your debt owners from your credit file too on ANY debt that you last paid or used in say 7 yrs? else more backdoor ccj 's might be coming.

never ever move without info debt owners and the DVLA (x2 sep letters)

could you also update your plantIce thread too...thankyou..

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, dx. Unfortunately, I was in a messy situation, mentally, and I had to move to different places, then get treated - I was on medication, that was very bad for me, for a couple of good months.

I presume all that's left for me to do now is pay this up, right? The full £265 amount.

I did not have any other existing debt, ever - other than this PCN and the previous Ice Planet PCN, where you advised me to send them that funny letter.

There was no action on their side for that one, as far as I am aware - could that transform into a CCJ as well, with all the mitigating circumstances I had...?

 

Thank you, again, for everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

update that thread and we will advise...but yes it could

get this one paid to the claimant PDQ today.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bother you, again, with a stupid question: is there a discount to that £265.60 due to pay, or do I need to pay it entirely, in a one-off payment now? Thanks in advance, again, dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...