Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio Termination Letter


ESE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

During the late 90s I took out four student loans, having never earned enough to begin repayment I always defer.

 

Three of the loans are managed by Honours Student Loans whilst the remaining loan was sold to Erudio Student Loans.

 

I will turn 50 in less than a year and was expecting the loans to be written off.

 

Last year (Aug/Sep 21) I submitted applications to defer to both Honours & Erudio (as I have for many years). The Honours deferment was confirmed by the SLC during the first week of September 21.

 

Erudio sent a reply saying that information was ‘missing’ from my deferment application. I reprinted my complete application and posted it to Erudio (I still have the certificate of posting). They continued to send letters stating information was missing from the deferment application. In October arrears were then added to my account and this continued monthly.

 

In Dec they issued a NoSiA letter followed two days later with a default notice. In January 22 Erudio issued a ‘Termination letter’.

In May 22 they sent me a ‘notice of sums in arrears’ for the full loan amount.

 

For a variety of reasons, I have buried my head in the sand with this situation but now need to deal with it. I don’t know why my deferment applications were not processed; they were complete with all requested evidence (I have never earned enough to start repayment).

 

After reading many relevant posts on CAG I have now:

-          Submitted an original SLC deferment application dated retrospectively for last Aug/Sep together with a letter of complaint stating that I do not accept that my loan is terminated etc.

 

Update to my previous post.

Forgot to say that three days ago I received a text message which linked to a letter from CAPQUEST which states that they are now managing the account.

 

Finding this very stressful - any help/advice greatly appreciated

 

Please advise If there is any further action you would recommend at this time.

Thanks in advance for any guidance

Link to post
Share on other sites

as they do.

they pull this stunt whenever they see someone is near to not being fleeced by them

 

erudio and capquest and drydens are all part of the arrows group same lot.

 

see how your complaint goes as they cant ignore you.

and you'll see lots of threads here where they have reversed their unlawful skullduggery

 

if not then off to the FOS.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question in relation to my previous post;

Yesterday I received another text message notifying me that a letter is waiting for me. I received the first message this way last Thursday and opened it (Capquest).

This time my intention is not to open it or view it.

Is this an acceptable means for Erudio/Capquest to contact me?

 

Thanks in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are under no obligation 

Emails,calls,texts should all be blocked bounced or reported as spam to 7726.

 

Just a free way to harass people 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they say a letter is waiting for you do they only send you a link to read it online or do they also send an actual hard copy through the post via Royal Mail?

 

If they send hard copy be aware that not opening the hard copy letter wouldn't help as it is deemed by law that it has been received by you two days (I think) after being posted 1st Class to your address.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update to my original post;

This week I have received a response to my complaint from Erudio.

It is a long winded letter but they acknowledge my two key points

1. That I dispute the termination of the account and

2. That I believe Erudio failed to process two deferment applications.

 

They state: 

Following my investigation, I can confirm that your complaint has been partially upheld however, there are aspects with which I am unable to agree. 

 

They go on to say that I may not have been contacted following receipt of my second deferment application and for this they will forward a cheque for £50 as compensation.

 

They do not agree that Erudio failed to process the deferment applications and support the termination of account.

 

I know I submitted the deferment applications correctly, I've been doing it for years but they are saying I did not.

My other loans (SLC) were successfully deferred last Autumn.

My intention now is to present my case to the FOS.

 

Any thoughts or advice given this latest development would be greatly appreciated

Many thanks 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey give the mug £50, if we keep this up and the mug folds we'll be £1000's in profit anyway.

 

please scan up what they have sent to one mass PDf

read upload carefully

 

dont move fwd yet to anyone, if at all.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, here is a copy of the letter I have received. 

Any advice greatly appreciated

 

Erudio response Aug 22.pdf

 

Once you've had time to read the response from Erudio, would you advise me as to whether or not I should go ahead with the FOS referral, or another course of action.

 

Thanks in advance - much appreciated 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You sent the same stuff to honours and they accepted it?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's correct.

I sent off both deferment applications at the same time at the end of last summer, one to Honours, one to Erudio. The Honours one came back accepted, whilst Erudio said the application was missing information (it wasn't). I resent another copy of my deferment application to Erudio and they did not process it. The rest is in the letter I uploaded.

Many thanks for your support 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All you need.

that kind of evidence Speaks for itself.

 

you will need to inc a copy of everything in/out since their refusal.

id get a cheap penstick

tape that to your very brief complaint letter to the fos.

 

Youll win this hands down

Dont forget to state that arrows are doing this to prevent your 50yrs write off

 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little tip.

 

Make it easy for them.

Whatever you do keep the letter very very brief, dont waffle!!!

 

Simply state facts, with good lines spacing between brief paragraphs of now more than say 30 words and only 1 page long.

 

Ensure you gives email, mobile etc.

They will write if they wish more.

 

Something like...

 

I wish to complain about erudio student loans and the way they have treated me, resulting in my personal right to write off my loan at 50yrs being unfairly  prevented.

 

I have 4 loans, 3 managed by honours student loans and one ( ref xxxx) by erudio.

 

For several years ( Xxxx to xxxx) i successful ly deferred all loans

In xxxx erudio refused despite the same documentation being accepted by honours.

 

Etc etc

 

 

Name the files on your penstick in date order.

2021-07-05 me to erudio deferment pack

2021-08-04 erudio to me deferment refusal

 

etc etc

 

youll win.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this detailed advice, it's really helpful and I will act on it.

 

I will carefully put this together over the weekend.

 

I will update you when I have the outcome.

 

Thanks again for your time, advice and support 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

and?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still compiling the case for FOS, in detail as you recommended (with supporting evidence). I intend to submit it by the end of the week.

 

In the meantime Capquest have sent a text saying claiming they are making an offer to conclude the matter. I have not opened the message.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good.

You're learning!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

Thank you for re-opening this thread.

 

Just wanted to update even though a final conclusion is yet to be reached.

 

I submitted my case to the FOS during the first week of September. Some time after I received a letter stating it could take several months for them to allocate an investigator.

 

Fast forward to Jan 23 and an FOS investigator has been in touch requesting bank statements (supplied)

 

in the last couple of days a further request wanting me to explain why I took close to six months to complain to Erudio following their NOSIA and Termination letters.

 

Any ideas?

 

One way or another I imagine a conclusion will be made by the FOS before long.

 

I will, of course notify you of the outcome. In the meantime I continue to be shocked by the numerous similar cases listed on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not saying anything wrong

but please scan up the fos requests.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

and?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a number of letters from Ombudsman requesting further information, clarifying the situation.

 

Ombudsman appeared to be supportive and presented findings to Erud/cap. They opposed.

 

Currently waiting for final ombuds decision.

 

Will give a detailed update as soon as final verdict is reached 🤞

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...