Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill ***Claim Dismissed***


autumn53

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again,

Update

Nothing through post but I received an Email from E-ON today that contains a link to the SAR material. 

The zip folder contains

Covering Letter

Bills and Letters pdf (contains past bills)

Audio recordings

Event history pdf  (mentions the disputed £3k bill)

Email pdfs

RDS Explanation

Financial Transactions pdf

I am enclosing a few documents after ensuring personal information is not visible.

Please could you have a look whenever you have a moment to spare.

Many thanks for this.

EON SAR Extract.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi friends,

This EON account in question was initially held and paid for (via direct debit) by my husband from Dec 2018 to Feb 2020.

We had raised an SAR on the 17th of Jan for my husband's information held by EON. They have not responded to this SAR and the 30 day period has run out today.

Please may I have some advice? We are meanwhile preparing a second SAR for the same but will only post if

we are advised to do so.

Many thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply ask them where it is

could still be in the post.

 

Dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again,

 

I received the attached text and email a few mins ago from EON.  I am hoping this is an automated text and I am supposed to ignore it given the fact that I am yet to receive my SAR documents from them.

 

The 30 day period for the reminder for my husband's SAR is due to run out on the 23rd of March. 

Thanks

Autumn

 

 

text msgs.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but do I understand that you send them an essay on 17 January and then on 17 February you gave them another 30 days?

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell us something about the SAR that you apparently sent.

I understand the dispute is in your husband's name – is this correct?

Who was the signatory to the SAR? – Was it you? Or was it your husband?

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I had initially raised an SAR for myself being the signatory in Dec 21 to which EON had replied with full details back in Jan 22.

The Dispute I would believe is in my name and I am getting the reminder for the payment.

 

2. Also, since my husband held the account initially and later transferred it to me in Feb 2021. The SAR for this too was raised in Jan 2022 to which EON sent no response and my husband sent a reminder in Feb allowing another 30 days. My husband was the signatory to this SAR. 

 

Thanks 

Edited by autumn53
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't fully understand the whole thing and I have visited this thread for some time.

If you sent an SAR with a 30 day deadline then I don't understand why you don't then enforce the deadline.

I telephoned E-ON and I told them that you had sent them an SAR giving them 30 days and that they breached the deadline so you gave another 30 days.
They laughed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I see the mistake I made. The reminder should not give them this long to respond. I think this happened because I was planning to send a fresh SAR instead, assuming they never received my SAR and being the senile self I am these days, I mentioned the 30 days in the reminder

 

Please is there anything that could be done about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any evidence that you sent the SAR? I'm assuming it was sent by post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm quite sure that they are going to breach the reminder as well.

So it's up to you if you want to take control. If you don't then it's probably not worth doing anything but then you still have a £3000 bill to deal with.

So on that basis, I will be looking to threaten them with a legal action and then to sue them for the distress they have caused. It would only be a small amount of money – maximum £100 but enough to cause them to look and see what on earth they are doing and to understand that they made a mistake by not supplying you with the data you want.

You have sent them a reminder which I believe expires about the 23rd of this month. You aren't bound by that date and and you could issue a letter of claim now if you wanted.

However you need to decide.

I notice that we first suggested that you send an SAR in the middle of December and yet you didn't send it until 17th of January. Then your deadline expired on 17 February and you didn't deal with that you simply gave them even more time.

I think you have to look at the way that you are dealing with this.

Believe me when they finally decide to take action for £3000, they won't muck around in the way that you are and they are more powerful than you and also the people who are dealing with this don't care. At 5 o'clock they simply go home and they don't think about you – whereas you have to live with this.

What you want to do? And more importantly if you do start to assert yourself – are you going to be consistent?

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I prepared my SAR on the day I started this thread as soon as I was advised by you to do so. Dec18th

and posted it the next day. They send a full response on the 13 Jan.

 

Then it struck us that my husband too has held this account in the past and has paid via direct debit for the same and it would be wise to raise an SAR for him too. We sent this SAR on 17th Jan. And the reminder on the 23rd Feb. (this is where I think I could have been prompter but life was lifing on me at that time) And then I gave them these extra 30 days that made no sense. Guess I am not cut out to take on these people. It is a massive sum and we are barely coping with unforgiving expenses. 

 

Trouble is, that we never even used this much electricity. We paid every month right from the start whatever Eon presented. This being a shared meter with a massive plant, I am unsure why Eon does not want to consider that such an amount is disproportionate to a household user. A family of an old, slow couple. This is beyond me.

 

I have read the forum a bit and am completely confused. My husband has given up. I have not seen £3000 in cash in a long time. I politely request some advice and I promise to follow it to the T.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR date.

I understand very well that your position is that you haven't used this much electricity. The trouble is that it's not us that you need to convince. It is either them or the courts.

If you want to push the SAR to begin with, then you will probably need to start a county court claim as I have indicated above – for a small amount of money – but enough to focus them.

I suggest that you spend a couple of days reading up on this forum about the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court. You might get some hints elsewhere. I'm not sure that the guide here is completely up-to-date because we don't have the resources to keep up.

However, we will help to see you through if this is what you decide to do. I suggest also that you visit the County Court money claim website and register there and start to get a feel for it.

If you feel that you are prepared to take a county court claim then let us know in a couple of days and then we will help you prepare the letter of claim you will send them giving them a 14 day deadline after which you will sue. This means that on day 15 you go ahead and you sue. It's not a bluff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your kind time and your sympathy.

 

I will read through everything and will post again once I feel I have a good grip on this process. 

 

Many many thanks for this. May god bless you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I was reading through the forums here and the MoneyClaim help, I received the result for SAR via post today. The package contains the same papers that they sent in response to the SAR I had raised as myself (not my husband"s). So basically, they have not given us any material they hold from the time when my husband held the account (from Dec 2018 to Feb 2020). They have just sent the same stuff as before... my data. (from Feb 20 to July 21).

 

My husband's SAR was sent on the 17th of Jan 2022 and the reminder on the 23rd of Feb 2022. It had my husband's name with our address and he signed it. No mention of me at all. An independent SAR from him to EON. Eon's letter today says they got this SAR on 08.02.22. And their letter is addressed to me. Why? When I am not even the signatory to this SAR

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are saying that they have disclosed your personal data to your husband – correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You aren't actually answering the question. Whose data is it and to whom has it been disclosed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

I had understood that they had disclosed your husband's data to or vice versa.

So what we are hearing here is that they haven't complied with your husband's SAR – they have simply disclose yours for a second time – is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...