Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

German car shop in Leicester wont take car back 8 days after purchase.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Aga.misia [edited - HB] said:

Hi

I purchased car on 22 may 2021.

 

I noticed vibration on steering wheel and seat when pressing brake and went to independent garage which confirm the vibration on idle needing further investigation and rear brakes are down to metal - suggested not be driven .

 

I want return car but the dealer refusing. Saying I have to drive to him , thats 1.5 hour and he will check it to confirm fault .

 

I want reject car , have I got any chances ? 

He also said I bought on trade terms ( I got 20 pounds discount ) but I m not a trader .

He says car is not faulty and I have no chances in court.

I m so upset .

Please help 

Car cost me 5430 f 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the name of the dealer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to German car shop in Leicster wont take car back - 8 days after purchase
WWW.GERMAN-CARSHOP.CO.UK

German Car Shop is a used car dealer in Leicester stocking a wide range of second hand cars at great prices. Visit us today for affordable used cars in Leicestershire.

Under the consumer rights act, if a defect occurs within the first 30 days then you are entitled to insist on a refund or a replacement – at your option. In this case it would be a refund.

In order to use this right, you have to assert it which means that you should write them a letter or an email telling them that you are rejecting the vehicle under the consumer rights act because of the defect and that you want a full refund.

Unfortunately, this will not necessarily make the dealership respect your rights but it is important that you assert his right so that you can show that you have done it and so that you can show that the dealer has disregarded their statutory obligations.

Once you have rejected the vehicle, the dealer is responsible for the return of the vehicle and that means that it is for them to make arrangements to recover the vehicle from you and to make the refund – and this should be done with a reasonable period of time – generally speaking seven days.

Once again, this doesn't mean that it's all going to happen and for a dealer to insist at the outset after only eight days that you should return the vehicle, tends to suggest that this is not a business which is interested in respecting your consumer rights.

How did you pay for it?

I have the impression that this dealership may be some distance away from you. Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , as I m from Hull. I sent him oficial  letter but he is not having it. 

Dealer sent me text messages and emails saying he will not accept return   , wants me to take car to him and he will inspect . He can buy car but for less then 4000 ppunds. He insist I dont have any customer rights to return car 

He is very arogant and rude. 

I paid by cash 

Edited by Aga.misia
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm sorry to add to your problems – but you better read our advice on purchasing used cars. Follow the link.

When you pay by cash – you lose complete control. If you had paid by credit card or using finance, then you would have had protection from the finance company or the credit card issuer. People who pay by cash or paid by bank transfer often find that they have these kinds of problems.

Was it the dealer who insisted on this method of payment?

Also, please read what we say in our used car guide about buying cars – long distance. It always causes problems because people forget to factor in the difficulty of returning the car even if the dealer is reliable, for repairs when small defects occur.

If the dealer is out to shirk responsibility then buying a used car by cash at long distance is a recipe for disaster.

Your problem now is that if you return the vehicle, you may not get your cash refund immediately. That could mean that the dealer will have your vehicle and also your cash. I'm afraid all too often we find that dealers suddenly become inaccessible even if you bring a court action and it becomes very difficult to enforce a judgement. Some dealers even change the company name so that officially they no longer exist – in order to frustrate their customers who they are ripping off.

Normally speaking I would have recommended that you take the car to the dealer, and then sue for your money back if the refund wasn't forthcoming. However, I'm worried about leaving you in a position where you have no car and no refund – and the dealer somehow or other disappears or avoids enforcement of a court judgement.

Can you tell us what the car is and what its mileage et cetera is please

Link to post
Share on other sites

SHO CAR LTD Trading as German Car Shop
10961566

Created: 30 May 2021 15:22:58

Companies House does not verify the accuracy of the information filed

Overview

  • Registered office address: 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU
  • Company type: Private limited company
  • Incorporated on: 13 September 2017
  • Status: Active

Key filing dates

  • Accounting reference date: 30 September
  • Last accounts made up to: 30 September 2019
  • Next accounts due: 30 June 2021
  • Last confirmation statement date: 12 September 2020
  • Next confirmation statement due: 26 September 2021

Nature of business (SIC)

  • 45112 Sale of used cars and light motor vehicles

People

Officers:
1 officers / 0 resignations

  • Director MAJID, Shoheb ACTIVE
  • Nationality: United Kingdom
  • Appointed: 13 September 2017
  • Date of birth: December 1990
  • Correspondence address: 20-22, Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU
  • Country/State of Residence: United Kingdom
  • Occupation: Director

 

No, you have an excellent chance in the Small Claims Court. Much better than 95%. The only problem is with enforcing the judgement. If this is a business that definitely wants to avoid being held responsible for the cars that it sells, then it will have ways of avoiding court judgements.

We are trying to advise you in a way which protects your best interests and as I tried to explain above, you could get the car back to them and then simply sue them for the refund and also the cost of having return the vehicle but there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but a chance nevertheless, that they may be able to avoid enforcement of the judgement and this would leave you completely empty handed.

Please could you post up the message that you have sent in which you rejected the car and also the reply received. In PDF format.

Who is it who inspected the car and told you about the fault? Can you tell us a little bit more about the fault

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent letter yesterday via email.

I dont know the person name though. There was 2 people 

The faults are on report from local garage  :

Rear brakes down to metal - dangerous

Vibration on idle - need further investigation

Edited by Aga.misia
Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, do you have written reports?

You say that you sent an email to the German Car Shop. So in respect of that, it is a question of copying the text that you wrote and them pasting it into this forum. That should be straightforward.

You say that you received a reply from them. Was that in writing?

Have you got the assessment of the garage in writing? Was it sent by email? Or simply in a written piece of paper or was it simply by word of mouth?

 

Thank you.

We can help you with this and we can help you begin a legal action in the County Court. However, the legal action will be done online using the County Court website and so you will have to get to grips with that and also posting up documents.

You are using a telephone at the moment and you are doing very well but I'm afraid that you are going to have to get a slightly better handle on it and when you have done it once, you will find it straightforward.

We need to see the message that you sent, the response from the dealer and also a copy of the report that you have had from the garage which identified the faults. We also need to see the advertisement.

Everything we do here is completely free of charge – but you will have to be able to engage with us and to deal with the technology to benefit from the help we are giving.

It sounds to me as if the car is in dangerous condition and should not be driven. The dealer has committed an offence by selling you a vehicle which is not a roadworthy condition.

Please will you experiment and put up the documents I have asked for. If you have documents in a paper form then I suggest that you download an application called "Adobe Scan" – and take a scan of the documents then post them up here.
As I say, once you have done it once – you will find it easy and you will be confident about it.

I'm going to suggest that you should issue a letter of claim immediately – and that is a formal letter telling the dealer that you are going to start claiming 14 days. We will help you write it and also we will help you prepare the document you need to start the court action but as I've also said, you are going to have to get to grips with the technology in order to benefit from our help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have report in writting and dealer received it but not having it

 

 

Quote

 

Dear German car shop,

Complaint about faulty goods

I bought Car from you on 22 05 2021. I paid £5430.

I now find the goods have the following faults :

- rear brakes are down do metal -dangerous - strongly suggest that this is not driven

- vibration on idle - requires further investigation.

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 goods you supply must be of satisfactory quality. As there was a problem with the goods when I bought them, I request that you give me a full refund.

I enclose copy of independent technican report in support of my claim.

Please respond within 14 days of receiving this letter.

Yours sincerely

xxxxxxxxx

Good afternoon. 

 

 
 
Quote

 

This information you have provided is conflicting please send us a video of the car. We checked the brakes prior to sale and they were well within the legal limits. U have previously told us over the phone that your mechanic has checked the car and there is nothing wrong with it.  You also stated that you want to return it because your garage said that its worth £4000.  This is based on trade value not retail value and doesnt take into account and additional spec the car has. Your basis for returning the car has gone from there being nothing wrong it, and wanting to return it because somebody told you that you paid to much.. to there being faulty brakes.  We are not convinced in the slightest.  You viewed the car before purchasing and agreed (and signed)to purchase it on a trade basis. 
 
However, at german car shop we take pride in our customer service.  To help you with this issue.  We propose that you return the vehicle to us so we can inspect it thoroughly, we will then make a decision on what we can do to help.
 
Kind regards.
 
German car shop

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for uploading that. It's very useful.

What can you tell us about their comments that you originally told them over the phone that there was nothing wrong with the car and you had had it checked over.

Also what can you tell us about their comments that you told them on the phone that you wanted to return the car because it was only worth £4000.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear German car shop,

Complaint about faulty goods

I bought Car from you on 22 05 2021. I paid £5430.

I now find the goods have the following faults :

- rear brakes are down do metal -dangerous - strongly suggest that this is not driven

- vibration on idle - requires further investigation.

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 goods you supply must be of satisfactory quality. As there was a problem with the goods when I bought them, I request that you give me a full refund.

I enclose copy of independent technican report in support of my claim.

Please respond within 14 days of receiving this letter.

Yours sincerely

[Removed - HB]

 
Good afternoon. 
 
This information you have provided is conflicting please send us a video of the car. We checked the brakes prior to sale and they were well within the legal limits. U have previously told us over the phone that your mechanic has checked the car and there is nothing wrong with it.  You also stated that you want to return it because your garage said that its worth £4000.  This is based on trade value not retail value and doesnt take into account and additional spec the car has. Your basis for returning the car has gone from there being nothing wrong it, and wanting to return it because somebody told you that you paid to much.. to there being faulty brakes.  We are not convinced in the slightest.  You viewed the car before purchasing and agreed (and signed)to purchase it on a trade basis. 
 
However, at german car shop we take pride in our customer service.  To help you with this issue.  We propose that you return the vehicle to us so we can inspect it thoroughly, we will then make a decision on what we can do to help.
 
Kind regards.
 
German car shop
 
Good afternoon
First thing You shouted me on phone on many occasions which I also have recorded and accused of being drunk when I was crying which is out of order.
I didnt buy on trade basis becouse I m not a trader firstplace. If I bought on trade basis I wouldnt pay 5430 f for 170000 millage car but less.  
I got independent report from place which I sent to you.
According to report I should not be driven car as its dangerous and there are vibration on idle .  So you put me in serious risk letting me having test drive . Within 30 days I have right to reject faulty car without accepting your repair according customer rights act 2015 . You sold me car which should not be driven.
So I would like to excersise short term right to reject car in first 30 days
 
Kind regards
[Removed - HB]
 
Okay. Please send me alo your recordings. Also please send me the pictures and videos of the faults. You already stated on the phone there was nothing wrong with the car. Im sure you will also have that recorded as you have recorded all our phone calls.
 
Secondly. We already know your claim is false. We had a report done on the vehicle prior to selling. Also our vendor does basic checks on the car.  All you have given us is a pieve of paper stating a fault. That is not a report. Where are the photos? If you wont pay £5430 for 170k miles car? Then why did you buy it? You chose to travel and we gave you first priority before the que of customers waiting for the car. 
 
You mentioned vibration on idle. Its a diesel engine with 170k miles. On the phone you compared it to a 50k miles friends car. There is no comparison. As a company we obide by the consumer rights. However we will not be frauded out of money just because somebody told you the car was too expensive.  
 
 
I look forward to your reply.
 
Kind regards. 
 
German car shop.
 
Dear Sir
I have the right to return  the car which have fault  within the first 30 days of purchase. This is the “short-term right to reject” rule under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.  
I would like you to collect car and give me my refund within 7 days. If not I will be taking it further.
Also I may sue you for malicious accusation of me being drunk when I rang you , when I was actualy in tears , not drunk. I m very upset about your attitude towards me .
 
Kind regards
[Removed - HB]
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you that is much better.

I still need an explanation of why you originally told them that there is an inspection which had said that there were no faults.

We also need to see the other assessment which describes the faults.

Also, you say don't have the the advertisement any more. Where was it?

 

You need to understand that if you go to court, then a judge will be asking exactly the same questions so you need to have answers

Link to post
Share on other sites

First mechanic said he dont see issue but he didnt perform proper check . So I went to another one who perform check and gave mi report whicj I will try to send uou whem I get grip with technology

Quote

 

Advertisement was on autotrader

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, well we need to see the written inspection which was carried out which identified the faults.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the report. It looks very good. Have you shown it to the German Car Shop dealership?

Are you prepared to take a legal action in respect of this?

You could do two things.

You could return the car at your own expense to the dealer – and then if the refund wasn't forthcoming, you can claim for the refund. If the refund was made then you would simply claim for the costs of getting the car to the dealer. However, on the basis that it is unsafe to drive you would have to organise a transport vehicle for it and I can imagine that would cost you at least £200 or so.
If you did this and no refund was forthcoming, it would leave you with no vehicle, no money – and out-of-pocket in respect of your expenses – and you would then have to bring a legal action for the lot with a danger that the judgement might not be enforceable.

You could hang onto the car and simply sue the dealer for the refund and also insist that the dealer made their own arrangements to collect the vehicle. If they collect the vehicle before legal action was issued then I would suggest that you would insist that the refund was made before you released the vehicle. If you allow them to take away the vehicle without giving the refund then you would back into the above position that you would have no vehicle and no money et cetera.

I think you should move quickly. This means I think you should be prepared to issue a legal action and that you should send a letter of claim tomorrow giving them 14 days or you will sue them. Don't imagine that once they receive a letter of claim they will suddenly spring to attention and do everything you ask. You must be absolutely prepared to issue the claim on day 15. It's not worth bluffing.

Bringing a small claim in the County Court is very easy and we have lots of information on this website if you read the steps involved taking a small claim in the County Court. We will help you through it and we will help you write your letter of claim and also draft your particulars of claim.
County Court claims are generally speaking started online using the County Court moneyclaim service.

If there is a hearing, then it is likely to be a remote hearing using Skype or zoom or something. We would help you prepare for this. On the basis of everything you have told us, your chances of success are excellent and frankly once the dealer realised that the claim had been issued and that you are going to go ahead with it all then it would be silly for them to defend – but maybe they will do it.

You should not drive the car. Partly because it is unroadworthy and so you would be committing an offence. Also, if the condition of the car deteriorated then you would be liable for that and if you happen to have any kind of accident you would also be liable for that.
I'm afraid that you will have to park the car up somewhere safe. Take photographs of it inside and out so that nobody can later on say that the car was damaged and this is why a refund wasn't made or only a partial refund has made.

If you want to go ahead with this then you should decide pretty well immediately. Don't forget there will be court fees to pay but I think that your exposure will be limited in all to about £400 also and of course on the basis that you win, then you will get this back as long as you can enforce the judgement.

In the event that you can't enforce a judgement for some reason or other then at least you have got the car and you could invest a bit of money in repairing it and you will have to simply put it all down to experience.

Let us know what you want to do
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bank fodder thank you so much for help , mean a lot to me

I m nerve wrack at the moment , cant sleep or eat , dealer treathen me on phone he has got good solicitors and I will lose.

I would like to take them to small claim court .

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't lose.

Are you able to record your calls? Read our customer services guide. Also, any further phonecalls you have from him make notes and then email him with a confirmation of what he has said to you.

You haven't told us whether he has seen this latest report of defects?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also rang him lot of times  , but he always said same story , will not accept car , now he dont answer phones. I also have text messages between us . He said that report mean nothing .  He says I agreed buying on trade terms and I knew there were faults so he is questioning whats he said in email about car being not faulty.   Car was advertised with full service history and no faults obviously.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want to start a legal action. Please will you read up on this forum the steps involved taking a small claim in the County Court. When you understand the procedure a bit then come back here and will go through the next step.
It's not difficult – but you need to be confident of what you are doing although we will help you.

I'm assuming that you prefer to protect yourself by hanging onto the car and issuing the claim first

It would help to have the advertisement – but it's not fatal. You could certainly contact auto Trader and see if you can get a copy of it. I think that one or two people have managed this in the past.

For the moment, please start reading up about taking a small claim in the County Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to take risk otherwise I have to repair car and sell , mind you I oveepaid so selling will be loss for me even bigger than court fee.

Please have I got any chances ? 

I would like you to also read text messages between me and dealer but dont knoe how post it.

 

Can I also claim for each day car stays on my driveway ? Whst about insurance and tax I pay but cant use car ? I  have to borrow my boyfriend car to work from now on

 

Sorry for my writting , english is not my first language

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...