Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Dryden +10yrs old CCJ - Creation Finance Adams Store Card - claim we agreed to up Payments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hoping someone knowledgeable can help me .

 

My partner has a CCJ for several years now, the court set the instalments at £30PCM that we have always paid in fact some months we overpay just to try and clear it quicker.

 

Quite a while ago we received a letter from Dryden Fairfax to advise the debt had been passed to them from Arrow Global and they would like the payments to increase to £50. We ignored this as its a CCJ , my way of thinking the payments can not be reviewed .

 

This month for the first time in ages only £30 was paid two days before the due date of the 28th April.  A letter was received dated the 7th May 2021 saying the payment due on the 28th April had been missed and we have failed to maintain the payments.

 

We rang Drydens who said in Feb 2020 we had agreed to increase the payments to £50 therefore £30 was not enough (even though at least two months of 2020 we only paid £30)

 

We are now worried as my partner is not currently working the outstanding balance is quite high can they claim the CCJ has been defaulted if the court agreed instalments have been maintained?

 

As you can imagine this has made us both very anxious.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

being mugged blind.

 

the judge set the £PCM level no-one bar the judge can change that.

 

Drydens are ARRows so don't fall for their silly games.

 

whats the CCJ all about please

 

what was the debt and who was the original creditor?

who was the claimant and when was the CCJ attained?

did you defend the CCJ and file a defence or was it a backdoor default judgement to an old address he knew nothing about

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx and thank you so much for replying:)

 

Original debt was an Adams store card we were paying for years way back

 

at least 10 years ago we fell into financial difficulties we asked to pay creations lower payments they agreed then a year later doubled the interest.

 

We stopped paying and went to the FCA 

my partner then received court papers through the door, I can not remember the year but this was quite a few years ago.

 

we believed the court case would not go ahead as we were contesting the balance -it still went to court and the balance doubled.

 

As we were going through quite a bit of stress at the time we just filled out the paperwork and were then sent the paperwork for the CCJ judgement of £30 pr mth we have never missed  a payment

 

Is it best to not overpay and just stick to £30?

Edited by coppernob
Link to post
Share on other sites

stop paying them.

 

they would have to return to court to do anything about getting more money out of you.

and then we can challenge and expose the whole scam that has gone on here.

 

i would suspect as like most adams cards of that era, it was changed to a credit card by Creation finance and you never agreed to that by signing a new agreement. that means the whole thing is void and unenforceable.

 

please don't be scared of a DCA or their pet solicitors.

there is really nothing they can do to you.

 

a DCA is not a BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's type.

 

NEVER EVER ring a dca or their dogs again, simply state writing only and put the phone down.

 

since the judgement have you moved?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows/Dryden +10yrs old CCJ - Creation Finance Adams Store Card - claim we agreed to up Payments

Thanks so much for your advise it really is appreciated :) No still at the same address. My only worry is if we stopped paying the debt is now still over £10,000 and we have a mortgage with my partner not working at the moment that is a massive concern.

Link to post
Share on other sites

something is VERY wrong here there is no way thats after having paid +£3000 you still have £10k outstanding on a STORE card 

theres no way you could have spent £13k+ on children's clothing with an adams store card!

 

is been adjudged , you've paid for +10yrs, so it can't come back on files

they can't force a sale of any home

and cant use Attachments to Earnings...there are no PAYE earners.

 

sorry but something id very wrong here..to me you've been had blind from day one.

 

stop paying ignore them.

let then get it back inti court and we'll expose them as thats the only way they could do anything further

 

do you not have any paperwork about it all at all still?

 

they would have to return to court to do anything about getting more money out of you.

and then we can challenge and expose the whole scam that has gone on here.

 

a DCA is not a BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's type.

 

NEVER EVER ring a dca or their dogs again, simply state writing only and put the phone down.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly that the final debt balance was £6000 or just under the rest were court costs. We did use to withdraw cash balances as you are correct it was a credit card too.

 

I have just found a letter from Dryden dated 20 March 2020 saying "Arrow wrote to you recently to inform you that they have acquired your account and this debt has been assigned to them from creation" this included an income and expenditure form that we ignored.

 

This has confused me as I thought the CCJ had always been with Arrow !!! I'll have to try and find the rest of the paper work now.

 

Creation are saying that our formal arrangement had expired and we need to make a new one - we ignored this at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, coppernob said:

the court set the instalments at £30PCM

no-one can vary that and it doesn't 'expire' the court set it.

 

9 hours ago, coppernob said:

 the debt is now still over £10,000

 

15 minutes ago, coppernob said:

the final debt balance was £6000

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope that can't happen.

even if it was fast track which was a £5k limit i believe then.

something smells here.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not if there was only one hearing or if HFC did what they used to do, and thats get post judgemental interest on the judgement.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right have found all the paperwork, the final balance was £7543.08 in April 2012 .

We refused to a pay due to high interest and high payments that we could not afford .

 

This then increased to £11876.50 when it went to court , costs were also added of £1937 in December 2014.

 

As we had been speaking to the FCA we did not realise it had still gone to court so our defence was struck out.

 

I have also found a letter from Creations dated 27 Nov 2014 where they had reduced the balance to £6686.18 which makes no sense as by then the court costs had been added.

 

Dryden were the original people we were paying as I have found their letter from December 2014 , so confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it all up please one multipage pdf ONLY.

read our upload guide carefully

just remove any of YOUR details like name address ref no's etc.

leave all dates and figures 

everything you have please..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the letter from Drydens dated Decemeber 2014 has a " General form of judgement order "attached dated 12 November 2014. Really confused it may take a while for me to upload but will give it a go

Edited by coppernob
Link to post
Share on other sites

we know how to work it all out.

take your time.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hidden

can you make those full sized to the page 

some are unreadable.

you also left the claim number on the order top right

have you your defence

have you yours and theirs witness statements?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have copies of the defence and witness statement. What I will do is sit down tomorrow and copy all documents to my phone first then transfer to PDF - it will be quite a hefty file though:)

 

I remember at the time just not being able to cope with it all so I just accepted the payments even though it looks like the right hand of creation didn't know what the left was doing and it looks  like that still the case today !

Again thank you your help and advise is really appreciated

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good lets have the full sorry story.

have you not got a scanner ? page scans are much better than photos if poss

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

good lets have the full sorry story.

have you not got a scanner ? page scans are much better than photos if poss

 No unfortunately only my phone but will get my son to help me send the file tomorrow.  I can't understand why they are acting as if its not a CCJ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, coppernob said:

I can't understand why they are acting as if its not a CCJ 

who?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you mean what they said on the phone by trying to dupe you into paying more than the judge ordered £xxPCM, well thats what DCA's and their dogs do LIE ...always, there's never any variance from that rule ever as it's all they can do.

 

don't forget this debt has been sold by creation to Arrows, it's now nothing to do with them, they have written the debt off which speaks volumes upon how enforceable they thought the CCJ was in the 1st place.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creations also sent my partner a letter AFTER the CCJ had been requested wiping off some of the balance BUT this was never deducted from the balance.

I have tried to upload the files but not having much luck.

Edited by coppernob
Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure your PDF is lees than 4.8Mb's.

 

why wont it upload what is the error?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...