Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Managers/Restons claimform - old JDW CAT debt


dave466
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well you should have submitted a statement in response and objection....refer to their application notice it advises you same.

Now you have a second chance you must submit a statement....it must be filed and served not less than 7 days before the new hearing date...when confirmed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes....try to have a read of what Summary Judgment entails...its a short cut for the claimant and runs separate to the existing process.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part24

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st draft

 

Claim No. xxxx

BETWEEN:
xxxx

AND

Defendant
xxxx
_________________________________________

WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxx
_________________________________________



I xxxxx, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows;

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence dated 26 April 2021 and in response to the claimants claim dated 25 March 2021 which was submitted through county court bulk centre.

1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct, disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. The claimant then issues on mass claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.

2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.

3.Background

Save insofar of any admittance it is accepted that a contractual relationship did once exist between myself and Jd Williams. On receipt of this claim I could not recall the precise details of the agreement or any debt and sought clarity from the claimant. 

I requested:-

A copy of the original agreement
A copy of the terms and conditions as applicable at the time of the agreement
A copy of the Default Notice/ termination notice
A copy of the legal deed/notice of assignment showing the claimants legal right to take action

4.Disclosures

The claimant has since complied and disclosed various documents however:

1) The credit agreement they have supplied seems to be a reconstructed agreement in which my details are clearly typed in the exact same font, this could just have been made up anytime at any point by anyone.

3) Debt Managers also state "The Defendant does not dispute signing the Credit Agreement" - I did not say that in my defence.

2) The default notice they have provided that one is from debt managers themselves, please note that a debt buyer cannot issue a default notice, they were not the creditor so therefore I am still awaiting on a copy of the original Default Notice that was served by the creditor themselves.



Statement of Truth

I, xxxxx, the Defendant, believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true.

Signed: xxxx

Dated: 08 February 2022

Link to post
Share on other sites

Requires a few tweaks Dave...I will get back to you later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay Dave I've been through your topic from the start to finish to refresh ...this is a considerable cat debt and I can see the amount of effort the claimants sols have put in not to lose this one. Your statement is not really suitable in response to this an application for strike out/summary judgment.

 

They have provided extensive documents in support of their claim...albeit some have been reconstructed to try to make their claim watertight.

I note that you accept that you owe the amount and quite rightly did arrange a payment plan with the OC but only managed to maintain a few payments...hence the OC assigned your dent to the claimant.

 

However we are where we are and you must submit a statement in response...subject to the quality and argument of said statement this may be to your benefit which could push the claimant into offering a Consent Order in which you could try to agree an affordable manageable payment plan say over 5 years should the claimant agree and stay the claim.

 

Ive had read the Paralegals statement in support of the application...which in the main reads as per usual spiel from this crew. The agreement provided is a please sign and return copy version...it states clearly at the top of the copy ...you state that you applied on line therefore it cannot be an exact copy. The executed signature by the creditor you will note is not dated....unsurprisingly. They confirm the same at 10 (iii)

 

Their statement refers to a default notice issued by the Assignee on 28th Jan 2020 delivered to your current address. If you look at the disclosure marked 69 from the Solicitor they state ..." 3. You failed to maintain the minimum monthly payments as required by the statements of account and accordingly JD William's terminated the agreement "

 

In their witness statement they state at 10.(vi) that a default notice (LD5) was served by the claimant in their own name as assignee owner.

Considering JD Williams had already terminated the agreement as confirmed above, then JD WIlliams would have issued an earlier Default Notice...which you didnt comply with and hence the agreement was terminated....before the sale to Debt Managers.

 

Therefore you cant issue a default notice on a terminated agreement ...the claimant cant disclose the original JD Default Notice...so in affect their attempt at serving a Default Notice on 28th Jan 2020 was pointless and not valid. Hence there is no mention in the paralegals statement re the original default or default notice.

 

The same goes for Notice of Sums in Arrears ...invalid on a terminated agreement.

 

Sooooo the Agreement ....not valid...the Default Notice  not valid ...the NOSIA  not valid and irrelevant.

 

I will leave it that for now and let you digest where Im coming from and let you consider the above....

 

Next we need to get it into a draft.

 

Andy

 
 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Andy.

 

So from what I've gathered from your reply is I now need to draft a witness statement to the effects of the agreement, default notice and nosia not being valid and also give reason as to why?

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct it must be well drafted and we have time on our hands I understand before you have to submit ( 7 days pre hearing ) ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's letter from the courts states.

 

By 4pm 13th Feb the claimant shall reserve the application and evidence

(They have)

 

Defendant must file and serve any evidence on which I wish to reply no less than 14 days before the next hearing

 

Claimants application is relisted for face to face on 8th March 2pm

 

Costs of today to be reserved 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine Dave so give me a nudge nearer the time (3/4/days before) and we can finalise your statement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Claim No. xxxx

BETWEEN:
xxxx

AND

Defendant
xxxx
_________________________________________

WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxx
_________________________________________



I xxxxx, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows;

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence dated 26 April 2021 and in response to the claimants claim dated 25 March 2021 which was submitted through county court bulk centre.

1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct, disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. The claimant then issues on mass claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.

2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.

3.Background

Save insofar of any admittance it is accepted that a contractual relationship did once exist between myself and Jd Williams. On receipt of this claim I could not recall the precise details of the agreement or any debt and sought clarity from the claimant. 

I requested:-

A copy of the original agreement
A copy of the terms and conditions as applicable at the time of the agreement
A copy of the Default Notice/ termination notice
A copy of the legal deed/notice of assignment showing the claimants legal right to take action

4.Disclosures

The claimant has since complied and disclosed various documents however:

a) The agreement provided is a please sign and return copy version...it states clearly at the top of the copy ... I applied on line therefore it cannot be an exact copy.
The executed signature by the creditor you will note is not dated. They confirm the same at 10 (iii)

b) Their statement refers to a default notice issued by the Assignee on 28th Jan 2020 delivered to your current address. If you look at the disclosure marked 69 from the Solicitor they state ..." 3. You failed to maintain the minimum monthly payments as required by the statements of account and accordingly JD William's terminated the agreement "

In their witness statement they state at 10.(vi) that a default notice (LD5) was served by the claimant in their own name as assignee owner.

Considering JD Williams had already terminated the agreement as confirmed above, then JD WIlliams would have issued an earlier Default Notice hence the agreement was terminated....before the sale to Debt Managers.

Therefore you cant issue a default notice on a terminated agreement, the claimant can not disclose the original JD Default Notice so in affect their attempt at serving a Default Notice on 28th Jan 2020 was not valid. 

Therefore the original default notice has not been provided as requested.

c) The Notice of Sums in Arrears is also invalid on a terminated agreement.

Statement of Truth

I, xxxxx, the Defendant, believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true.

Signed: xxxx

Dated: 21 February 2022

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 days for Summary Judgment application.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read box 10 on the claimants application notice n244.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I understand that but would that now not be superceded by the letter I have got from the court due to me missing/rearranging the meeting.

 

Obviously I would have had 7 days before but I wasn't aware of the court meeting etc and tahts now why it's been rearranged and I have this new letter from the court/judge.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that's what the latest order states then yes you will have to go with that.....not the norm though CPR 24 as always been 7 days pre hearing.

I wont be able to look at this though Dave until tomorrow latest. (Wed is 14 days)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thats what it states in the letter so id rather be safe than sorry.

 

No problem thankyou Andy I have re adjusted the ws and will await for a response from yourself and then get it sent off.

 

Thankyou very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where you refer to a document or one of their documents don't forget to insert after the paragraph (See exhibit A/B/C etc) then attach them to the statement.

 

Best of luck

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...