Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio student loans - account terminated for failure to defer


RyanO
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, any good advice welcome 

Trying to be brief: 

three loans transferred from SLC to Erudio along with a lot of other people’s Have been diligently deferring every year for nearly twenty years as always well under threshold. Until 2020... 

went to defer online, form slightly more complicated than usual (partly as has just started claiming UC due to loss of work due to Covid) and also because they wanted a letter from an accountant along with my tax return, which usually is all I’ve had to send).

So paused it.

Then forgot about it.

Low winter with no work, lockdown related stuff, a bereavement), stupidly thought I’d be ok to defer whenever and was just accruing a few arrears (although I now realise that apparently they don’t do the 25 year wipe with outstanding arrears anyway).

legally perhaps all responsibility is mine here.

They send letters that I don’t open.

Actually wasn’t clear they were from them - some had M&S taste card logos on so assumed they were junk Mail. 
 

Try to pick up online deferment again last week but not there.

Phone them and an told account now terminated and full amount (£6500 inc arrears) now due.

They try to get financial info off me on phone, how much council tax I pay etc but I don’t give them much and say I’ll call back.

They know I am on UC. 
 

Lots of research done since but am overwhelmed and unsure how to proceed.

A lawyer friend has helped me draft a letter that I haven’t sent yet saying I don’t accept termination, that I’d like to go back to deferrals (presumably they won’t do this ever now they have me where they want me). Ask for TCs and copy of original agreement. I guess they’re within their rights but is there any grey area?

Also I’m guessing I’m not statute barred as have been deferring regularly? Although not on paper for perhaps over six years. 

now a letter yesterday from them pretty much just reiterating but also sneaking in vague idea that I could suggest a settlement. 
 

how to proceed?

What will they do?

Is it right that even after a CCJ they’d only ever get a couple of quid a month from me as a friend suggests?

How do I weigh up letting them get least amount possible and also getting rid of them forever.

Settlement sounds tempting of course but not sure I could give them much over 800 (my overdraft) 

would appreciate succinct advice from people who know.

Thanks in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

let them run 

just dont ignore a letter of claim.

 

lets really see where things stand 

have you access to the old SLC portal?

can you go look and see if to them your deferrals ( which you should never have done post 2013...!!) are showing.

 

how late are you.? when was your last successful DF date?

 

you should never have been using their DF form, they ask far too many questions they are not entitled to know the answers too.

always use the old blank SLC form pre 2013 which is the stickies of this forum.

i'm temped just to send that back dated😏 ( oh you didn't get it when i sent it before here is a copy lucky i took one at the time)

 

you are not over the threshold NO? and have never been?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThommyB said:

there’s something in terms and conditions that I originally agreed to or since inadvertently whilst deferring? 

 

in relation to what?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldn't trust/believe them on anything.

don't think we've seen a court claim for 'failed to defer / we've terminated.' ruse

last thing you should ever do is phone a fleecer

they LIE!!

 

SLC Portal?

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have spoken with CAB just for their opinion.

 

They advise first of all requesting original Terms and Conditions  .

That legally the 98 ones should hold as a condition of the sale from SLC.

 

For a start the CAB guy seemed to think it was wrong that as a result of the account being terminated  & i lose the right to have the debt written off after 25 years.

 

He also thinks it’s 25 years after signing last loan agreement (2000 in my case) rather than end of studies. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

never seen any luck with SLC not in  T&C's to do it

everyone loans got sold by the Gov't.... none have ever been successfully challenged to sale was OTT regardless to any T&C's.

 

as for the dates:

 

When will your student loan be written off? - Martin Lewis' Blog... (moneysavingexpert.com)

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You’re saying Erudio don’t care about original T&Cs?

What I want to know is what are the rules on how much notice of termination (due to lateness or failure to defer) they are required to give 

 

Also have people in my position eventually been issued a CCJ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesnt matter if there is anything or not in the T&C's...thats immaterial now...

the gov't sold the debts from SLC to Erudio (arrows DCA in sheeps clothing). negates lots of things.

 

there are numerous Erudio claimform threads here use our search top right.

 

i think what this boils down to, in erudios eyes, is you've not deferred since the 2019-2020 season, so last 'contact' was feb 2019 .

they always either issue a backdoor claimform to an old address or as you legally told them of your correct and current address by repeated referral, they default and terminate you. either simply happen because of a long term lack of contact. they think it gives them the right to try and mug people.

 

there are a few claimform threads here where by they issued a backdoor CCJ/Claimform, people defended with like situations like yours and they go quiet and let the claim get stayed.

 

i'd use and wack off a copy of the old SLC deferment forum in this forum to them, for this year, they can't refuse it, even though they'll write and say already terminated or wrong form excuses, 

 

see what they do but do not ignore a letter of claim, comeback here if you get one.

try and stay away from places like CAB/Stepchange/Payplan as 8/10 their advice on any debt is totally useless and typically ends in you paying.

 

just remember the golden rules...

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. It’s just confusing trying to work out exactly how to respond and how they may progress. Presumably there’s no chance of them ever getting 6500 quid of me and they know that 

 

On 11/02/2021 at 15:57, dx100uk said:

i'd use and wack off a copy of the old SLC deferment forum in this forum to them, for this year, they can't refuse it, even though they'll write and say already terminated or wrong form excuses, 

Original SLC Forms for Deferment here.. - Student loans/SLC - Consumer Action Group

Thank you.

I don’t know if I’m being muddy headed.

I have had no other debt to speak of so not even overly familiar with terms.

But I’m finding it hard to get a handle on whether they are legally entitled to claim this money and whether this all drawing it out since eventually a court judgement would find me owing, and whether by that time total will have increased 

And won’t they just refuse old deferment form saying too late account closed your right to deferment finished?

What is point in sending? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i said ....there have been numerous court cases by erudio here whereby the 'debtor' had not earned over the threshold and have sent a 'late' deferment form in and erudio refused saying your loan has matured, terminated, etc etc , they have gone nowhere... now stayed sitting dormant without judgement.

 

don't ever think on any debt whereby a powerless DCA issues a speculative court claim, that they have any special powers whatsoever, the only powers they have are exactly the same as you and me if we think someone owes us money, issue a court claim.

 

although you say you've read up , i suggest you spend a day or two on here only use our search top right for Erudio, that will get you upto speed upon why/what i've suggested might be the best idea.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all your advice 

Sorry, a question because I can’t see readily anywhere else and I may not quite understand the technicalities,

 would you assume that I am not statute barred if I’ve been deferring, albeit online rather than in writing, every year?

That constitutes accepting the debt?

Last time I physically deferred on paper may have been 2014

. Before I write or send a paper backdated signed SLC form 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you had not missed a deferment when would your normal deferment now be due?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so october 2019, that ran till oct 2020 ...feb 2021 some 5mts late with this current deferment...

 

15 hours ago, ThommyB said:

(although I now realise that apparently they don’t do the 25 year wipe with outstanding arrears anyway)

 

you only supposedly have arrears now because you failed to defer since oct 2019?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, well about four months late I think (in a lockdown, in a pandemic, not that that should bother them) 

but no, arrears now are since beginning of October ‘20 I think - about £500 

Questions:

are they within their rights to terminate? Guess it looks like they are but... 

what are rules and protocols surrounding this and have they been followed? 

Can they refuse an attempt to backdate deferral? 

Can they produce evidence of my original signed agreements? 

will they ever attempt to put through a CCJ for this?

They know apart from anything that I am on universal credit so even after this would only I assume get a pretty measly monthly payment off me) 

Sorry I realise you say you think it unlikely to go anywhere in court 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are the creditor so yes they can terminate etc etc but when fronted they can just as easily remove it.

Its pretty much immaterial anyway.

 

Stop fretting on court if if if it goes that far its a walk in the park to sort it.

Go get reading up..all these questions you will answer for yourself.

 

DX

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

I think I’ll write telling them I don’t accept or acknowledge, ask for my original signed agreements and put in a backdated SLC deferment. And see what happens.

Will carry on reading and ask questions if necessary if that’s ok x

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd bit only.

dont invite pointless letter tennis with pointless posturing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just for the record:

no acknowledgement by Erudio of deferment on SLC form sent and received by them recorded delivery six weeks ago.

Now three separate statements of arrears arrived by post today for each of my three loans.

Amounts as was when informed they’d terminated my account in January.

Guess I’ll just ignore

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

yep

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, 

just wanted to update this thread.

Eight months since initially told account has terminated and no contact except for three automated statements.

No threats or demands, so that’s good. 

I’m at the point in the year when I would’ve ordinarily deferred.

I expect you’ll say it would be a daft idea, since it would set back any potential future SB status, but just checking you don’t think there’s any merit in sending another old SLC form, or doing anything else at this stage besides what I’ve been doing which is to sit quietly. 
 

I must say I expected them to start hassling me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...