Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VCS ANPR PCN PAPLOC now claimform - appealed - Berkeley Centre Sheffield *** Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 796 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies for rushing, this whole thing has really caused me a lot of stress, and i guess I am impatient to resolve it.

 

Here is all the details on the claim form:

 

 

Name of the Claimant : Vehicle Control Services Limited

 

Claimants Solicitors: Elms Legal

 

Date of issue – 3/8/21

 

Date for AOS - 21/8/21

 

Date to submit Defence - 3/8/21

 

What is the claim for  

 

1.The Claim is for a breach of contract for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land.

 

2.The Defendant's vehicle, ******, was identified on in the Berkeley Centre Pay & Display on the ****** in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely parked without purchasing a valid Pay & Display ticket for VRM. At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver.

 

3.The terms and conditions upon entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 

 

4.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply, namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability.

 

5.The Claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.

 

What is the value of the claim? £245.00

 

 

Amount Claimed £160

court fees £35

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £245

 

 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

the ****** in breach

 

we need this date please..to be able to confirm the claim  is in order..

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

 

.......

 

there are lots of berkeley claimform threads here to read 

use our enhanced google search box 

 

berkeley claimform

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS ANPR PCN PAPLOC now claimform - Berkeley Centre Sheffield

Ive just read  through the whole thread and i see from day one you made a fatal mistake by replying to them , then almost sent a paploc reply shooting yourself in the foot again. Now you rush again to do something without asking 1st and tick contest jurisdiction.

 

can i politely suggest you dont now do anything without 1st checking here ? As you are entering into very dangerous waters against someone that will exploit you at the drop of a hat. 

 

can you post up the ntk please as we never got to see it? We have you appeal but not the org ntk

 

Thanks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Apologies for rushing, I really appreciate the advice so i will slow down from here on out. Am I not right in feeling confident that they cannot win this case however? They have not complied with POFA, and I was not the driver, so how can the court allow them to hold me liable?

 

As for the POC, the date in breach was 06/10/2020.

 

I have attached the original NTK below.

 

Thank you again for all the help!

Scan 1-merged-compressed.pdf

 

Hi,

 

I have prepared a CPR 31:14 request which I have attached if you could check that I am on the right track/if i should include anything else?

 

Also, Does a CPR 31 request need me to pay them for costs?

 

Kind regards

CPR 31 Redacted pdf.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if disclosing the requested documents puts them to cost....which invariably never happens.

 

Quote

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just send our template as is no need to change/add anything bar addresses etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they don't respond anyway most times.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

the CPr request has been posted. Should I start preparing my defence now, or is there anything else I should do first?

 

As for defence, is this sufficient? Or should i also include breach of POFA, KADOE, DPA etc...?

 

1.  The Defendant is the registered keeper of *****

2.  The signage is prohibitive in nature and not a genuine offer of a contract for consideration. 

3.  In any case it is denied that the Claimant entered into a contract with the Defendant. 

4.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont ever miss defence filing date regardless to whatever does or doesn't happen. But dont file early either

 

plenty of Berkeley claimform threads here to see what others have used

well done on your effort above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx,

 

My deadline for submitting defence is 4pm friday the 3/9/21.

 

I will look to file my defence on MCOL a few days before that date.

 

Do you think I should add anything else to the defence?

 

I feel like the basis of my argument is that they haven't complied with POFA, should I include this?

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't give the game away no.

 

100's of berkeley threads here to read and you'll understand why.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I see you reported a post to tell us you had received a letter from the court.

 

Please let us know here what has arrived and the regulars will help.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again everyone,

 

I have now received another letter from the court which is a notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing).

 

Please find the copy attached with personal information redacted. 

 

It is asking for me to submit any documents on which I intend to rely on in court, which documents should I send? Or is it likely that VCS will not continue with the claim?

 

Kind regards, and thank you very much in advance!

 

 

Court Notice of allocation.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
pdf's merged
Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not agree to the claim being dealt with on the papers alone.  Two reasons.

 

Firstly, Simon could tell any old lie and you'd have no way of countering it.

 

Secondly, you cost VCS money.  Although they have a litigation department, their bods never appear in court - which may or may not be connected with VCS's representative being threatened with imprisonment by the judge in a famous case - so have to fork out money for a solicitor to represent them.  Now & again they discontinue a case rather than spending this money. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so witness statement time by 7th jan.

 

ive merged your single pages to one mass PDF

please try to remember to use PDFmerge websites.

 

there are plenty of berkeley  WS's here to base yours on too.

 

get reading up.

 

and return that form refusing papers only case!!

 

dx

 

 

 

^^^ updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi everyone,

 

I have had a busy christmas but have just managed to draft up my witness statement!

 

I need to deliver it by the 7th January so I don't have too much time, but if anyone is free could you have a look at it, and let me know if im on the right track?

 

I just need to include all of the appendix documents but everything else is finished.

 

Please find attached.

 

Kind regards

Copy of WITNESS STATEMENT redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a first glance that looks great work.

 

One slight gripe is that in (4) you mention "the illegality of their claim".  It's not illegal.  Change it to "the unlawfulness of their claim".

 

I'll have a proper read tomorrow.

 

Have VCS sent you their WS?

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you've written is excellent, but if we can fine tune it so much the better.

 

In (22) and (23) you did actually receive these two letters, right?  Just they are not mentioned in your thread.

 

Realistically the judge won't throw out the claim due to the Unicorn Food Tax or a breach of the CoP, so really your only argument is POFA.  It's a very strong argument but if the judge doesn't accept it then you're scuppered.

 

I think it would be better to include other arguments.  The judge only has to agree with one to chuck Simon in the bin.

 

So after (21) stick in another section about Locus Standi, reiterate what you wrote in (5), say that VCS are not the landowner and have no right to bring the claim.

 

Immediately after put in another part about planning permission, reiterate (5) and state you do not believe VCS have PP which is a criminal offence and means a contract couldn't be formed.

 

I would put the stuff about the Unicorn Food Tax at the end.  So the order would be

   current 1-21

   locus standi

   planning permission

   current 30-34

   current 22-29

   current 35-end.

 

You haven't told us if you've received VCS's WS yet?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks coherent using FTM Daves suggestions  but a sight of VCS WS would be very useful for any tweaking.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FTMDave, 

 

Thank you so much for looking at it for me!

 

I did indeed receive both of those letters, and I will include them in the appendix of the WS.

 

I have tweeked my WS and added another section as you suggested, please find attached.

 

I have not yet received anything from VCS.

 

Kind regards

 

 

Copy of WITNESS STATEMENT redacted (1).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

When does Your WS need to be in?  Simon might try to leave theirs until last minute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The revised WS looks damn good to me.

 

Hang on till as late as possible to try to get sight of Simon's.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes always suspicious when Simon doesn't pass on WS until last possible minute, Of course if you don't have it by the submission deadline you can go to the court and tell them so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...