Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost parcel through Packlink/EVRi - claimform issued against Evri - **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

My case is pretty generic, still I would like to share it and would appreciate any help.

 

I privately sold iPhone XS through eBay for £390.

 

Purchased Hermes delivery through Packlink on 3rd of December 2020, did not opt in for full cover.

 

Dropped the parcel off at the ParcelShop on 4th of December, later in the day tracking updated to "Collected from the ParcelShop".

No further updates were received through tracking.

 

On the following week I tried to find out what was happening with the parcel I sent,

called Hermes first, bot said I need to contact Packlink.

 

Contacted Packlink on 9th of December, they said they will start investigation.

 

Received an email from Packlink on 12th of December saying investigation is complete and the parcel is confirmed by the carrier as lost. 

In the same email they were suggesting that I need to submit the claim form.

 

Few days later I have submitted the claim form stating the value of the goods that were sent is £390, and providing proofs for that (printed eBay page).

 

The claim has been approved few days after, but it was stated that I am only getting standard £25

(there was no option to accept or reject, it was a matter of fact that I am receiving this much compensation).

Considering the situation I had no other option but refund the buyer.

 

Recently I found this forum and read peoples` stories and decided to take action myself.

I am going to start a claim against Hermes, as Packlink is trickier being located in Spain.

 

I haven't contacted either Packlink nor Hermes yet regarding the full compensation,

I would like to ask for your advice for the best course of action:

 

Can I send a letter before action straight away, or it's better to try and contact their customer support first

(this is what Hermes suggests doing for any complains)?

 

Do I need to reply to Packlink saying £25 compensation is unacceptable and I request full compensation

(I think it would make more sense if I would be planning to sue Packlink)?

 

Does it make any sense to sue Packlink as well as Hermes?

 

I have drafted a letter before action which I am enclosing with this message.

There were plenty examples on this forum,

I took one and edited it to reflect my case (hope this is permitted).

 

I am also enclosing correspondence with Packlink.

 

Letter before action 2.pdf Chat.pdf Claim Paid.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter before claim

 

I used your services to deliver a parcel containing iPhone XS 256 GB valued at £390 to an address in the United Kingdom.
I understand from Packlink that the parcel was lost by the carrier.


Your contractual obligations were to deliver my property safely to the intended recipient.


This is my notice under the pre action protocol to you that I'm proposing to issue a claim through Northants Bulk Court against you for the value of my property – £390. + postage + my costs


If I do not receive a reimbursement  within 14 days then I shall sue you in the County Court without any further notice.
Yours faithfully

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to sending the letter advised by my site team colleague above, make sure that you have read about the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court so that you are broadly aware of the process.

Register with the court service moneyclaim website and start preparing your claim. Post a draft of your particulars of claim here so that we can check. It doesn't need to be wordy. Brief and to the point is all you need. You don't need to send additional particulars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk

BankFodder

Thank you for your responses, I will start to prepare my claim.

 

Also, considering this topic I thought it's worth for me to contact Packlink first and request full compensation from them, giving them 14 days to respond, and then send letter before claim to Hermes for the remaining balance. Or is this completely unnecessary?

 

I do not want to rush and trying to smooth as many corners out as possible before making something that cannot be undone. Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA to packlink thats who you employed.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can certainly try Packlink – and we were very surprised to find that recently two people actually were compensated by Packlink. Frankly I was astonished.

It would be easier than making a claim – so you may as well try and the only thing you lose is a little bit of time.

However, don't hold your breath and don't forget that Packlink is in Spain and so if it comes to nothing then you will have to sue Hermes.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses once again.

I am totally prepared to make a claim against Hermes, but I will email Packlink first to show that I genuinly tried to resolve through them first in case they will refuse to compensate.

I am enclosing draft email to Packlink with this message.

Letter to Packlink.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The email is fine although of course it contains an empty threat. Anyway, see if it draws a response – but don't forget that Packlink is in Spain. Very complicated to sue them. You will have to sue Hermes

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I would expect, Packlink came back today with the following:

Quote

We truly apologise for the inconvenience caused by your chosen carrier with regards of this delivery since the parcel was declared lost. We definitely understand that you were expecting to receive the full refund, however this shipment was not insured and the amount to compensate is the basic one for Hermes.

From our records your shipment is only covered by STANDARD COMPENSATION, you did not purchase ENHANCED COMPENSATION.

 

I have just sent a Letter before claim to Hermes CEO email.

I also have a couple of questions:

  • It is said in it that I shall sue them if I will not get reimbursed within 14 days, however they might come back earlier and refuse to compensate - I believe I still should wait for 14 days to file the claim, is that correct?
  • I believe it's unnecesary to send hard copy of the Letter before claim via post, is that right?

Thanks for your help and support!

Edited by siege_creep
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's been almost two weeks since I sent the letter before claim to Hermes, so I am ready to start a claim this week.

 

They responded to my email by simply saying that they are unable to help due to the fact that delivery was booked through Packlink. I can post the text of the email here if this helps.

 

Here is my claim draft (found example here and altered for my case):

Quote

The claimant seeks reimbursement of the value of a parcel which was lost by the defendant delivery service about 8 December 2020 date. The delivery was arranged through Packlinka broker acting on behalf of the defendant. The parcel was contained iPhone XS 256 GB item was worth £390. £28.79 has been reimbursed by Packlink and the claimant now seeks the balance of £361.21 from the defendant. The defendant declines to reimburse the claimant. The claimant relies upon the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Alternatively the defendant was negligent.
The claimant seeks £361.21 plus interest per section 69 County Courts act 1984+ costs.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hermes came back with the defence, attaching in the PDF file. I added sentences from the particulars of claim they referred to.

It is said that tracking number has not been provided in the claim, hope this should not make a big problem as I will be able to provide it later with all of the proofs.

If I do understand it correct, the next potential step could be mediation. In the meantime I will be preparing the documents, so I can provide all of the proofs needed.

Also, in one thread it has been mentioned that it is possible to request Hermes to provide their contract with Packling by filing CPR 31.14 request, would that be worth doing in this case?

Thank you for your help and support.

Hermes Defence.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the defence is absolutely predictable. No difference to anything else.

However I have to say that I'm pretty gobsmacked that you have been sending correspondence and eventually a particulars of claim without even mentioning the tracking or reference number.

It's obvious that they have no idea what you're talking about because they have millions of parcels every year – many tens of thousands which go wrong – and you haven't given them a clue as to which one you are talking about.

Assuming that you are going to continue with this, you will get a directions questionnaire and when you complete it then you should make sure that the tracking number figures very clearly.

I'm afraid it's a bit unhelpful adding your own notes to their defence document. It makes extra work for us. It is much easier if you type out a very brief note on the points that they are making and then give your comments separately on the thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @BankFodder

Thank you for your reply.

I admit that this is my fault that I did not include tracking number with particulars of claim, however when I was sending letter before claim I made sure to include it (I sent it via post and email), they possibly just did not link these events with eachother, not sure if on purpose though.

I am not sure if I can somehow provide additional details with directions questionnaire, but may be I can enclose a note?

I will take your advice into account, thanks!

Thank you for your help again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, we've just received a donation and I think it came from you – thank you very much indeed but I'll be emailing you directly.

I'm extremely pleased that it has been settled.

Maybe you could tell us what the settlement was and how it went. We've had several people who have given us a summary of the mediation process that it is very helpful for other people.

Did they settle everything or did you give up some figure?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Lost parcel through Packlink/Hermes services - **WON**

Hi @BankFodder

So I think the key at mediation is to be consistent with your claim. It is important to mention your key points - such as Right of the Third Parties Act and Consumer Rights Act effects for my instance. If they lose your items, I think they should be able to prove that they have performed their service with reasonable care and skill, because otherwise you can assume that the item was simply stolen.

Eventually I decided to give up negligible amount as in my opinion it was not worth it to chase for the penny-to-penny figure.

I hope this helps to anyone in the similar situation.

Edited by siege_creep
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. It would be helpful to people if you could say specifically how much you gave up. Was it the court costs?

Also, did you find that you came under any pressure from the mediator to compromise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Sounds great and obviously worthwhile.

I hope you've also acquired some transferable skills which will help you to sue anybody else who gets in your way.

And we are always happy to help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lost parcel through Packlink/EVRi - claimform issued against Evri - **WON**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...