Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
    • So a little update.  I sent a complaint to ico and have heard nothing. I just got the general reply email and that's it.  Sat twiddling my thumbs and thought about what I should do next. I searched for the CEO of Studio but then found that he'd left so as keep getting letters from studio about the arrears etc. I thought I'd email the David Twigg. Sent him all the bumpft and a copy of my original complaint and sars request.  Got no response. So didn't know what else to do. Then I thought I'd try through the financial difficulties option on the online form. One last try before I just give up and let them default me.  Then on the 5th June. I got an email from their customer services. That the items that had gone AWOL have all been cancelled. Nothing else on that email, so I had a look in an email account that I don't use anymore and there was an email from the customer service.  That they were sorry for the problems I've had for the last 9 months. That the sars info was emailed to me on 14/04, it wasn't I've kept all spam and deleted emails on that account, they have raised a complaint with their studio pay team regarding the issues, balance dispute, fee's and my credit file. They are hoping to resolve in 3 days but they have upto 56. They also said in regards to my other issues I have to raise a complaint with studio retail but haven't told me how I do that.  The sars info only goes upto the end of December 2023. It has my previous complaints on there but nothing after so I don't know how I get hold of that information. Luckily I've kept copies of every time I've contacted them. Every web chat or social media contact.  Apologies for the extremely long post but I wanted to add everything I could just incase.  I have checked my account balance and it's still minus 900 odd pounds but I'll keep checking to see if it's all cleared and on my credit file.  I'm hoping this is the end of the whole debacle and they close my account because I never want to do this again. Although it's been a learning experience.  Thanks to dx100uk for pointing me in the right direction. Much appreciated.   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • If you want to cause DCBL trouble, then complain to the SRA.  It would be even more fun if mystic_bertie would complain at the same time, to show the SRA there is a pattern.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way - Friends Barclaycard


Geestra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1364 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have a query on behalf of a friend.

 

She had a Barclaycard:

Account opened 02.12.2015

Last payment 30.06.2016

Account Default 24.02.2017

Balance £1556.00

 

She began receiving letters from Robinson Way which she ignored.

She then received a Letter of Claim from Howard Co & Solicitors on behalf of Hoist Finance on 12.09.2019.

As per advice given on this forum, she filled out a Reply Form (taken from this forum, not their one) and sent it back to them along with a CCA request.

 

She did not hear anything back from any of the above firms until the other day on 28.08.2020.

This letter was from Robinson Way and spoke about setting up a repayment plan.

 

She emailed Robinson Way with a complaint essentially saying that because they hadn’t complied with her requests, the debt was unenforceable.

The next day Robinson Way emailed her back with an email saying they had sent her copies of the original agreement, copy of terms and conditions, charge off statements and default notice issued by Barclaycard but they had been unable to provide and send them until 11 June 2020, as they had to wait for Barclaycard.

 

She did not receive the documents they apparently sent in June 2020 but they emailed them to her in their email response the other day.

 

It says that the credit agreement is a reconstituted copy.

 

Could I please get some advice for her with regards to what she should do next?

 

It is a bit confusing/concerning because Howard Co & Solicitors sent the Letter of Claim, so what does this mean for the situation?

 

Many thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why confused...?They are all one and the same group.....and HC is their mouth piece Solicitor.....only a Solicitor can send out the Pre Action Protocol pack.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

It would be advisable to scan redact and upload what Robbers have sent for opinion...

 

Andy

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HC have already sent and had our std reply back to the PAPLOC.

 

i bet the CCa return its the usual 620'0000 T&C's garbage with no sight of a signed agreement anywhere in it..bogroll !!

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have attached the CCA (redacted) that Robbers Way sent!

 

Barclaycard’s cover letter which accompanies it says:

“Enclosed is a reconstituted copy of your credit agreement together with a copy of the terms of your credit agreement as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act.

This is a statement of the terms of your agreement with us and incorporates any variations to the terms made since you entered into this agreement.”

 

Also, the CCA only states her first initial and surname where her name is stated – I don’t know if this matters or not?

 

Rightly predicted that there's no sight of a signature.

 

Does this CCA not have legal standing then?

 

My friend is still worried, she says that HC are "proper" solicitors or at least their parent company is apparently??

She fears they'll take it to court if she doesn't pay because HC wrote to her previously with the Letter of Claim.

Best I can do is advise her based on your advice though - the rest is up to her.

Barclaycard CCA.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Enclosed is a reconstituted copy of your credit agreement 

 

 

On a 5 year old agreement and they dont have the original......? :mod:...:becky:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and no sign whatsoever of the IP sign detail

time

rate

IP number

type signiture...

 

opps thats just a set of T&C's with her name inserted.

 

she says that HC are "proper" solicitors or at least their parent company is apparently?

 

cohen's rarely ever turn up at any court hearings... should Hoist raise a claim.

they use hired local rep's that 9/10 are in a boat with a large hole in it already by agreeing to representing Hoist's chosen solicitors cohen....

 

typically they rely upon a defendant no realising the actual person that wrote  their Witness Statement MUST be in court ...

 

i can see...no signed agreement and just sheets of T&c's that prove nothing that an agreement was ever signed online at xxx time from xxx IP address from xxx address.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your informative responses.

 

I'm going to pass the info on to her and I'm sure she'll be confident to just ignore them now.

 

I note that they didn't provide the Notice of Assignment that she requested in the Letter of Claim - does this matter at all?

I'm just asking as I'm curious and it could be another factor against them should anything happen further down the line!

 

Gee

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NOA is fatal so's no proof of signing original agreement online or otherwise

default notice is fatal too.

 

sorry but they are flying a kite here.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Robinson Way - Friends Barclaycard
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...