Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went down hill. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Colleague Received CCJ, unknown creditor and it is marked as Satisfied!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

My colleague has been attempting to obtain vehicle insurance and been knocked back as the brokers have determined he has a CCJ.

 

This has come as a shock to him as he was unaware of any claim.

 

Having looked into it he has found the following information:

 

CCJ granted to an unknown creditor in August 2020 for about £1400

 

The details of the Judgement show him at an old address which he vacated in 2012 (so a back door judgement).

 

Most astonishing of all the Judgement is being shown as satisfied!!   He has certainly not paid it off as he did not even know it existed.

 

I have composed an email to the Court for him asking for full details of the original claim as a precursor to making an application to have the judgement overturned which he is sending just now.

 

Obviously we need to wait for the Court to return details of the original claim but we will be challenging it on the grounds that it was obtained at the wrong address and no defence was possible but if it had been possible to defend then the grounds would be SB.   Also, worth asking the creditor for full documents supporting the debt if they have any but until we find out who it is then waiting for the Court.

 

Would anyone have any opinion or experience of overturning a Satisfied judgement?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may get some information here

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/

 

Even though the judgement appears to be satisfied, it would simply take a normal set-aside application

Link to post
Share on other sites

just ring northants bulk and ask for a copy of the Claimform AND the Judgement CCJ

hell need the CCJ number from his credit file.

 

if northants dont have the claimform.

ask them to read out the address it was sent to 

AND 

the particulars of claim

RECORD THE CALL.

 

one you have the details of the claimant, the debt, etc comeback here.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK we have contacted the Court and they advise that the original creditor was Eon and it is believed the debt was sold onto debt buyer and it is that party that has obtained the judgement.  The court would not give out much information but my colleague paid £10 to have all the details sent to him which will take about a week.

 

Interestingly, the court clerk asked how he wanted to pay the debt, did he want to pay by instalments etc which is an odd question to ask if the judgement is supposedly satisfied.

 

Will post back here when full details received.  I would expect the next step to be an N244 applying for a Set Aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a typical lowell backdoor CCJ to me.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done DX!   It is a Lowell back door CCJ.

 

We have today received details from the court.  This is the shorthand version of their claim:

 

Claimant: Lowell Portfolio Ltd

Solicitors: Lowell Solicitors Ltd

Judgement Date: 3rd August 2020

 

1. defendant entered into supply and service agreements with Eon Energy (the Agreement)   (No start or end date mentioned)

 

2. The agreement later ended but a Liability remained

 

3. Agreement later assigned to Claimant 12/07/2019 and notice given to defendant.

 

4. Repeated requests for payment sum remains due and Claimant seeks sum and interest and costs.

 

This is the story from our side:

 

Defendant lived at the address until November 2011, and settled his account with Eon at the time he moved out.

 

He has not lived there since November 2011.

 

It is disputed that a debt exists and the Claimant who is not the original Energy provider has not provided any proof of a debt existing by virtue of either not sending it or sending to an address the defendant does not live at.

 

The Defendant has not received any correspondence regarding the claim as he has not loved at the premises for eight years.

 

Given the length of time that has passed not withstanding whether a debt exists or not this case should be SB.

 

So I guess the next step is to fill out an N244 to apply for the Judgement to be set aside.  Should I come up with some wording based on the above or does someone want to suggest wording?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

might save him the £255 fee to go ring lowell solicitors and and ask them to set aside the CCJ by mutual consent FOC to him.

it is obvious from the story the debt was statute barred and at some point lowells or the court system has realised this and marked it as satisfied.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

these situations are different

you ring you catch them off guard without a warning so they can't concoct a tissue of lies or fake p/work as with letter/email

if it's 100% true that the CCJ was obtained outside of 6yrs they can't have a reason to reject and do it for free inc removing it from credit files.

 

don't forget record the call

all you should need is the CCJ number.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update.

 

My colleague did not want to ring them. 

The saving of the application fee was/is not as important as getting a swift set aside and he felt the best way was to apply to the court for set aside without a hearing. 

 

He has done so and the court has sent an acknowledgement and assigned it to our local Court, so we now wait for something else to happen, presumably either a set aside or a Hearing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...