Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor Arrow/Drydens 2008 CCJ/CO - MBNA Card - , debt was already SB'd , **WON** set aside - Now being chased 12yrs later.!!


mandyjayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks IGNM

 

not sure what you mean re: bogged down in applications?:confused: Sorry can you explain.

 

Yes i will phone the court tomorrow and post with their reply.

 

Thanks MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 486
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you do nothing there is a risk that they would try to enter a default judgment, which you would therefore have to apply to set aside - as it is they may well apply for relief from sanction - that is they may apply to set the strike out aside - so it is possible that you are going to have have to oppose their application.

 

It is better from your point of view to be the one who has done what the court has told you.

 

By the way make sure that you keep the envelope that their letter came in

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other thing to remember is that MC may read these threads

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again IGNM...

 

I will keep the envelope and, i will not do nothing.

 

I shall put in my defence/letter not sure which.. before this Friday..:D

 

Post tomorrow with what the court say

 

MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again IGNM...

 

I will keep the envelope and, i will not do nothing.

 

I shall put in my defence/letter not sure which.. before this Friday..:D

 

Post tomorrow with what the court say

 

MJ

 

You can decide what to do after talking to the court tomorrow...

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all..

 

ok i have just spoken to the court they have received the new defence from claimant but it was logged onto the court system on May 28th..so they were out of time.

 

The lady said to write a letter re: the strike out to the court manager, but can i have some advise from someone please on the best foot forward with this.

 

If it is struck out is judgment then in my favour, and am i right in thinking it has to go in your favour so that the claiment cant re-open the case??

 

Help PLEASE...have until Fri with this.

 

MJ:D

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the claim has been struck out the Claimant can apply to the court for relief from sanction

 

Have a look at Magdas' thread...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/189645-outstanding-costs.html

 

There are a series of hurdles that they have to jump through to get relief and you are entitled to oppose any application.

 

As far as that is concerned it is a question of waiting and seeing what the other side does

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all..

 

ok i have just spoken to the court they have received the new defence from claimant but it was logged onto the court system on May 28th..so they were out of time.

 

The lady said to write a letter re: the strike out to the court manager, but can i have some advise from someone please on the best foot forward with this.

 

If it is struck out is judgment then in my favour, and am i right in thinking it has to go in your favour so that the claiment cant re-open the case??

 

Help PLEASE...have until Fri with this.

 

MJ:D

 

I'm a bit confused - I thought that they had to comply with the disclosure Order - what defence are we talking about...

 

In terms of the court - what did they tell you to do about your defence - were you told to file it anyway or told to write to the court manager about the other sides' failure to comply with the unless order.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit confused -

 

Glad I wasnt the only one who read that and thought... what defence? MJ, you are the defendant and not counter claiming as far as I understand, you also had until 5th June to get your defence in.

 

S.

Edited by the_shadow
Went back for the date defence had to be filed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry for confusion,:confused:

 

What i meant to put was the court have received the claimants "reply to Defence" which had to be there as stated on the court order, by 4pm 22nd may, but not received until 28th may.

 

 

And yes they are supposed to have complied with disclosure order, but have not.

 

The court said they dont give out legal advise so cant help with what i have to do about my defence being there by Fri.

 

All she can suggest is to write in again as before to the court manager, but i want to know from you guys if this is the best thing for me to do!!?

 

Hope this is clearer:D sorry trying to do a thousand things in a short space of time!

 

MJ

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry for confusion,:confused:

 

What i meant to put was the court have received the claimants "reply to Defence" which had to be there as stated on the court order, by 4pm 22nd may, but not received until 28th may.

 

The details of the order you posted up didnt state this as far as I'm aware.. did you omit this?

 

as far as I can remember the order was for them to give the complete disclosure documents listed to you by 22nd may

 

and that you have until 5th June to file full defence in reply?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

shadow im getting really confused..

 

Im looking at the court order and it says

 

Before district judge ***** sitting at ****county court

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. Unless by 4PM on 22nd May 2009 the claimant provides the documents requested by the defendant pursuant to paragraph 3 of the order dated 11th March 2009, the claim be struck out.

 

2. The time for filing of the defence be extended until 4pm on 5th June 2009.

 

Dated 28th April 2009.

 

The claimants sols have sent to me and the court a reply to defence as stated above with no docs apart from the set of statements, the application form etc etc...no default notice etc.

 

I have no idea if this is right or wrong...sorry but this is all i have

 

Do you need me to type in their reply to Defence?

 

thanks MJ

Edited by mandyjayne

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

shadow im getting really confused..

 

Im looking at the court order and it says

 

Before district judge ***** sitting at ****county court

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1. Unless by 4PM on 22nd May 2009 the claimant provides the documents requested by the defendant pursuant to paragraph 3 of the order dated 11th March 2009, the claim be struck out.

 

2. The time for filing of the defence be extended until 4pm on 5th June 2009.

 

Dated 28th April 2009.

 

The claimants sols have sent to me and the court a reply to defence as stated above with no docs apart from the set of statements, the application form etc etc...no default notice etc.

 

I have no idea if this is right or wrong...sorry but this is all i have

 

Do you need me to type in their reply to Defence?

 

thanks MJ

 

Ok, this basically says they had to provide the documents to you, why theyve done a reply to defence instead of complying with the order I dont know but its an unless order and they havent met the required instruction so the claim will be struck out.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to the Court Manager - mark your letter URGENT and send it by Fax or special delivery or hand deliver it and get a receipt. It needs to arrive at court ASAP

 

I'd say something like this

 

"Dear Sirs,

 

Re: Case name and Number

 

I refer to the above and to the Order of the 28th April 2009 that the Claimant shall by 4pm on the 22nd May 2009 serve me with disclosure, pursuant to the order of the 11th March.

 

I would advise that the Claimant has failed to comply with the Order and did not serve the required disclosure by 4pm on the 22nd May.

 

In the circumstances my understanding is that the Claim is struck out without further Order. As there is now no claim. it having been struck out, I consequently do not propose to file a defence.

 

I look forward to receiving a sealed copy order formally striking out the Claim in due course.

 

Yours faithfully"

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the other side are likely to claim that they've complied with the Order and that they may try to enter a default judgment against you

 

- hence the letter to the court

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

IGNM...yes they have... in the reply to defence, tried to get a default judgment against me and requested my claim be struck out, i was asking weather to post up what was written on the reply to defence but no-one picked it up!

 

I have prepared the letter you have suggested..:) and will send it tomorrow...

 

and just for reference this is the order dated 11th march with paragraph 3 refered to in 28th Aprils order.

 

The Order

 

1. The judgment set on 17th september 2008 is set aside.

 

2. Permission for defendant to file and serve a defence by 4pm on the 15th April 2009.

 

3. Claiment to produce by 1st April 2009 all documents requested in defendants letters of 17th Nov 2008.

 

4. The interim charging order made on 20th Oct 2008 is hereby discharged.

 

5. costs.

 

MJ:-)

Edited by mandyjayne

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...

 

IGNM's Letter sent to court first thing this morning... as in (post 313) above, recorded delivery.

 

Just have to wait now..

 

I feel like im supposed to be doing more..can someone just advise about the fact they have a Reply to Defence, i did ask in an earlier post weather i need to type up what they have said in it for help ..so that i can respond correctly...sorry just want to go over this so its right

 

things like: this document is offered in reply to the Defendants Application to Set aside dated 21st Nov 08.

 

Goes on about it not being statute barred then at point 6 it says: the claimant requests that the Defendants Defence be struck out and judgment granted in favour of the claiment for the amount claimed.

 

Now can someone tell me weather this is something that needs attention now..this was of course received after the 22nd may unless order (post 311)

 

MJ

Edited by mandyjayne
add

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...

 

IGNM's Letter sent to court first thing this morning... as in (post 313) above, recorded delivery.

 

Just have to wait now..

 

I feel like im supposed to be doing more..can someone just advise about the fact they have a Reply to Defence, i did ask in an earlier post weather i need to type up what they have said in it for help ..so that i can respond correctly...sorry just want to go over this so its right

 

things like: this document is offered in reply to the Defendants Application to Set aside dated 21st Nov 08.

 

Goes on about it not being statute barred then at point 6 it says: the claimant requests that the Defendants Defence be struck out and judgment granted in favour of the claiment for the amount claimed.

 

Now can someone tell me weather this is something that needs attention now..this was of course received after the 22nd may unless order (post 311)

 

MJ

 

MJ, chances are there wont be many people who can help around at this moment (day jobs :D).

 

If you believe it will help to type up the Reply to Defence so people dont have to ask questions, then that might be a good idea. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...

 

IGNM's Letter sent to court first thing this morning... as in (post 313) above, recorded delivery.

 

Just have to wait now..

 

I feel like im supposed to be doing more..can someone just advise about the fact they have a Reply to Defence, i did ask in an earlier post weather i need to type up what they have said in it for help ..so that i can respond correctly...sorry just want to go over this so its right

 

things like: this document is offered in reply to the Defendants Application to Set aside dated 21st Nov 08.

 

Goes on about it not being statute barred then at point 6 it says: the claimant requests that the Defendants Defence be struck out and judgment granted in favour of the claiment for the amount claimed.

 

Now can someone tell me weather this is something that needs attention now..this was of course received after the 22nd may unless order (post 311)

 

MJ

 

No - at this point you don't but it might be an idea if you do type it up so we can see what their response is

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - at this point you don't but it might be an idea if you do type it up so we can see what their response is

 

the bit that is confusing me is if this is as MandyJayne has stated their reply to the set aside application from Nov 08, the judge has ruled on this, surely they should have requested a set aside of the judgement/order he made not send it in reply to the order of disclosure that the judge requested complied with.

 

Or am I just even more confused than I thought?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bit that is confusing me is if this is as MandyJayne has stated their reply to the set aside application from Nov 08, the judge has ruled on this, surely they should have requested a set aside of the judgement/order he made not send it in reply to the order of disclosure that the judge requested complied with.

 

Or am I just even more confused than I thought?

 

S.

 

No - I think that they've filed a formal "Reply to Defence"

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...