Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hermes and Packlink- Lost item


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, 

I will try and make this as straight and to the point as possible. I sold an electric guitar on eBay on the 14th of June with a final sale value of 1100 GBP. I organized a courier delivery via eBay's Packlink service where I chose Hermes as the courier. I securely packaged the guitar inside of a cardbox with the dimensions of 110 H x 50 W x 15 H, so a large parcel, and dropped it off at a Hermes collection point on the 15th of June where I received a reciept of upon handing it over. According to the tracking information, the parcel was collected from the drop off point at 3.54pm on the 15th of June and the last update was at 3.50am on the 16th of June where it has been stuck at 'at the national sorting hub Northern'. So less than 12 hours after it was collected it has gone missing. I can understand if it was perhaps a small letter but we are talking a very large parcel here.

 

I was informed by the buyer on the 21st of June that the parcel has still not arrived and that is when I started to make investigations into it's whereabouts. I quickly realized that it was impossible to source a contact number to speak to an employee at Hermes so I have had to resort to correspondance via Resolver where I have opened up a case with both Hermes and PackLink. After continous emails back and forth, Hermes have today passed the buck onto PackLink and plainly said that they cannot assist me any further. Packlink have today advised that they will lodge an investigation into it's whereabouts but that they require 30 days from the 25th of June. 

I am at the stage where I am ready to make a money claim online but a) I am unsure who I claim against, Packlink or Hermes? and b) when should i be lodging the claim given that Packlink are asking for 30 days to investigate this?

 

Thanks,
Chris. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Packlink are in Spain – conveniently out of the jurisdiction.

If you want to bring a claim then it will have to be against Hermes.

Please will you start off by reading the other stories on the sub- forum and some of the posts at the top in particular which tell you something about your rights.

You can be certain that if you sue Hermes for £1100 that they will probably force it to a hearing.

Read the other posts so that you understand the situation and it will save a lot of repetition here

 

also, it is fairly early days and I think that it would probably better to let the investigations go for another couple of weeks. I'm sure it won't produce any particular result – but at least you will be able to say that you have tried.

I'm afraid that we are getting very disappointed with Resolver about these kinds of things

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, if you are going to bring this case then you are going to need to prepare your arguments very carefully. As I have already suggested, it is likely to be defended and it is very likely to come up before a judge.

You should be looking carefully at the consumer rights act – especially the sections dealing with unfair terms and restrictions on exclusion of liability.

This means that you should be looking particularly at section 47, section 48 and section 49 – which basically impose a duty to carry out services with reasonable skill and care.
You should then be looking at part two which deal specifically with unfair terms and also schedule two which gives a nonexhaustive list of examples of unfair terms – and I think that example number two is probably a reasonable starting point.
Don't forget that they are merely examples and you will need to persuade the court that your situation is capable of being unfair on the basis that you have paid the delivery fee and that it is unfair to expect you to ensure Hermes against their own negligence because this effectively protects them from their statutory duty to exercise reasonable skill and care when carrying out the service that they have contracted with you to do.

I think the arguments are very powerful and I think you have an excellent chance of success

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou. Update- 

PackLink have gotten back to me regarding the investigation into the whereabout's of my item that they asked 30 days for. After just 1 day, they have confirmed the parcel is lost. 
 

Quote

"Dear Chris,

After completing the investigation with the carrier the shipment has been confirmed as lost. I am writing to let you know that the dossier has been transferred to the Claims department for the final evaluation."


They do have both my eBay and PayPal invoices confirming the item value of 1100 however I am guessing that will offer me the basic Hermes coverage of 25. 

So 2 questions really-

1. If they offer me any less than the full value of the item, do i decline this offer? I imagine accepting any offer would effect my claim going foward in the small courts? 

 

2. When is the right time to make a claim? Now, or after PackLink get back to me with an offer of compensation? 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you accept an offer from them then you will be taken to have settled.

I think I have already explained that you will not be taken action against Packlink because they are domiciled in Spain.

You will have to begin a claim against Hermes. You will need to begin the claim presses against Hermes and get a written refusal.

After that, you can issue a letter of claim giving them 14 days. Make sure you are fully aware of all the steps necessary in bringing a small claim in the County Court.

In fact I have just realised that you have already contacted Hermes and they say they can't assist you any further.

So I would say that you could issue a letter of claim against Hermes at any time.

But probably best to wait until you hear definitively from Packlink

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

Yes I understand that I have to claim against Hermes and not PackLink

Another update- As expected, PackLink won't do anything to compensate me since the item sent was a musical instrument. Here is their response .
 

Quote

" Dear Customer,

We are sorry to inform that your shipment was categorized as Prohibited/Restricted. Please note, when you booked the service following information was provided from your side:

Please find below the Prohibited/Restricted section where the containing of your shipment is set out:



Musical instruments
Any kind of musical instruments.


We do apologize for the inconveniences; we are unable to accept your claim since your shipment is not covered by insurance policy ".


So since PackLink can't help me and I have written confirmation that Hermes cannot help me, can i issue a letter of claim to Hermes now? 

Please can you point me to that as this is all new to me. 

Thanks so much again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you declare it as a guitar?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I believe so. The guitar was sold on eBay and I paid for a Hermes delivery directly through the eBay listing using PackLink so all the details would have presumably been carried through from the eBay listing. There was no option when booking to input what was being sent etc so I can only presume it is all added automatically. 

Edited by hullman
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite a high value claim – and so I think that it is worth proceeding a little bit cautiously and getting as much information as possible.

For that reason I think you ought to make a claim through Hermes and see the basis on which they decline you.

I think you should contact Hermes and say to them that you reject the fact that they are declining your claim and referring you to Packlink. You consider that they are responsible and that you are using your third party rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act and you want them to confirm that they are declining your claim and the reasons why.

In a separate letter, send them an SAR. Make sure that the SAR is off to them straightaway.

I think that it is always sensible to avoid being underprepared and I think that if you can obtain as much information as possible before you go into open conflict with them, it will be helpful to you.

I'm particular concerned that you can only say "I believe so" in response to the question as to whether or not they knew it was a guitar.

It certainly not fatal by any means – that it would be helpful to know that they had advance notice as to what they were carrying. However, I'm quite certain that the prohibited items list is unenforceable in respect of any lost item

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have hidden your post. If you want to disclose your own identity – then that is up to you it seems to me that you have disclose the identity of the addressee as well and that person may not be very happy about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click the SAR link and you'll find out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so your basically saying to send that off so I can gather as much information together before pursuing a small courts claim? So essentially, I might have to wait for 1 month until the SAR arrives before I can make a claim? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. We'll see what your claim letter produces. That you may as well get the SAR underway. It's free and there's no downside.

We'll play it by ear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just an update on this. It seems one cannot just go onto the Hermes website and find a claims form to download, it's something that has to be authorized and sent once having spoken with a customer service representative. Hermes seem to again be reluctant to help me and issue me with a claims form since this was all booked through Packlink

The last response from Hermes I received today via Resolver was- " Unfortunately, to initiate this procedure of the refund or replacement, you will have to go through the correct channels which means you will have to contact your re-seller. This is because we can only see parts of the tracking information regarding retail parcels and any discussion of these details with you would break our contract with the retailer. " 

This sounds like utter nonsense to me. How can only see parts of the tracking when you are the ones in charge for the safe transit of my parcel from location A to B. Wouldn't you require full access to all tracking of parcels to ensure their whereabouts?  I'm not familiar with the law but this sounds like excuses being made to try and confuse people. 

Should I now just proceed with a MCOL? I've exhausted all avenues with both Hermes and Packlink and I am getting nowhere. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check back for a response tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check the letter below – make sure that you're happy that it is all correct and it represents what is actually happened.

Please note that I have referred in the letter to the fact that you have said that you have tried to contact them by other routes. Is this correct?

Before you send this letter of claim, please do understand that it will make no difference and all you are doing is satisfying a pre-action protocol formality and that you will absolutely have to issue the claim papers. What this means is that you should not send this letter if there is any doubt in your mind about bringing a legal action. Don't bluff.

Also, do not send this letter until you have spent a little time reading on this forum about bringing a small claim in the County Court. It's not difficult – but it is helpful to you to know the steps.

Once you send this letter, then register on the Moneyclaim online website – which is the court services website and start preparing your claim.

Post a draft of your proposed particulars of claim here before you actually click the claim. We can then have a look and advise you.

After you sent this letter, and you are fully prepared, – day 15 click the claim off.

Quote

Dear Sir/Mdm,

 


Letter of claim – parcel reference number X X X. Claim reference number X X X

 

On X X X date I used your services to send a parcel containing a guitar value £1100 to an address in X X X name of town X X X.

I have now been told by yourselves and also by Packlink that you have lost the item.

I have tried beginning a claim process – but although I have made strenuous attempts to contact your offices – both by your formal complaints route and by other means, I have had no success.

Looking around the Internet, I now understand that you are overwhelmed by complaints because of your generally poor handling of people's property, your technical breakdowns which have resulted in incorrect scanning of barcodes and the confusion of labels, the possible theft of items from your warehouse – and also apparently the routine sending by you of parcels placed in your care to an auction house in Birmingham – often bearing senders addresses or recipient addresses – and often within as little as three weeks of the item having been sent.
Most recently when I tried to engage with you, you told me that you are not prepared to access certain reference numbers because you considered that it would violate some agreement between you and Packlink.
You should understand now that under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act I enjoy all the rights of a contracting partner – and it is on this basis I shall be issuing a court claim against you.
I'm afraid that given your record and your reputation, I'm not prepared to accept any further delay and I'm afraid that access to your customer service function has now become unreasonably difficult to the point where I consider that you are deliberately obstructive.

As a result of this, I'm writing to inform you that unless I have full reimbursement of the value of the parcel – which was properly declared – plus the fee paid for the courier service within 14 days that I shall bring a claim against you in the County Court and without any further notice.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggested draft particulars.

 

Quote

The claimant who is a litigant in person use the services of the defendant courier company to send a guitar value of £1100 to an address in X X X name of town X X X.

Tracking reference X X X claim reference X X X.

The defendant courier service lost the parcel and has refused to reimburse the claimant or two process his claim.
The claimant seeks reimbursement of ££1100 plus the courier fee of £X X X plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for your help, it's truly appreciated. 

With regards to trying to contact them, I have a) emailed Hermes, b) emailed Packlink, c) Opened a case with Hermes using Resolver, d) used Hermes online chat robot 'Holly'. Many phone attempts have been tried also, but no working numbers exist to my knowledge, at least ones that I can get through to. 

Just a quick query regarding the reference numbers to be included in the letter of claim. I understand the parcel reference will be the Hermes tracking number (I'll also include the packlink reference number), but I'm not sure what the claim number will be? As i've stated previously, I haven't been given any official claim number as I've not been able to make a claim with Hermes. The only thing I do have is reference numbers relating to the customer service chats regarding my parcel and also a resolver case number. Shall I include all of them?

Edited by hullman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just include whatever reference numbers you have so that they become in no doubt as to who you are and what it is about

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well another update. 

Just as I had written a letter of claim last night expecting to send it off today, I woke up to an email from Hermes this morning expecting the worst as usual.  I was amazed to be told that my parcel was at the buyers local depot which was subsequently delivered this morning. I am beyond relieved, and that is an understatement. 

Whether this was down to my relentless persistence with Hermes I'll probably never know. What has shocked me the most is the fact I've been told my Packlink that an investigation was carried out to it's whereabouts and ultimately deemed 'lost' and non compensated for. It's obvious now that this was totally untrue. 

Part of me feels like I should be making a claim against eBay and Packlink, and probably Hermes too due to the complete lack of competence on their behalf which put me in a very difficult and stressful postition for the last two weeks. 

Either way, I couldn't have asked for a better result and I thank you for your help non the less. It will certainly stick with me should I be unfortunate to find myself in this position again in the future. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this update.

Obviously I'm very pleased that your guitar has been delivered and that you don't have to take any further action about this. On the other hand, I'm slightly disappointed because I was hoping that this might be an opportunity to deliver a serious slap against Hermes.

Anyway, who knows why it happened like this – but the most important thing is that the item has been delivered and you're not out of pocket – and also probably you have learned a good lesson – don't use Hermes – or Packlink. It's a recipe for trouble.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...