Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML/LMC anyone claimed for mis selling and unfair charges?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has the bickering finished yet?

 

I was thumbing through the new charges Capstone have put up (online) for SPML. The previous charge of them checking your own insurance for £50 has gone but they have replaced it with one that states they will charge £50 if you cancel theirs, if they have to put it in place. Anyone noticed that? Another bone of contention if they have been charging you previously?

 

I see that numerous companies have jumped on the band wagon to 'assist' with claims for mortgage arrears fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...

 

I crawled through emotional bloody barbed wire to get this and other stuff on brokerage posted and got told left right and centre it had nothing to do with anything...

 

Ended up nearly dropping off here altogether, BUT, I had the point, I have the point and I'm still making it...finally it seems that some want to look at the regulations and the law and see whether there is mileage in this...it was all I asked.

 

Somewhere on this thread dated early november is a whole breakdown of the brokerage stuff...take a look. It will astound you...people were screaming for coordination here and as soon as I started going through the ABCs all I got was:

 

"No...you can't do it like that...I had a good broker."

 

Hardly the bloody point but thoroughly dispiriting when you have been banging at this from all angles, day in day out, not just here but behind the scenes also.

 

Call me sensitive. I'm not actually. I'm very thick skinned, but will fly off the handle at ill thought out tripe, or walk away from the nonsense because I can't be arsed with it any more.

 

I'll just prove the pessimists right and deal with it as an individual and take what comes. Sod community, because if this is community, I want nothing to do with it.

 

PS applies to all (my wiser self included). Keep the personal crap off this thread. THIS THREAD IS TOO BLOODY IMPORTANT FOR ALL THAT RUBBISH.

 

God give me strength...

 

I know how you feel.

 

The point of sale is all important.....

 

We need to pull together and keep the roof where it belongs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapstone

 

Glad to see you back. Something has been bugging me for ages. I can't find any proof that they have signed me up for block buildings and they say I am definitely not on it. How the hell can they prove as opposed to assert, a negative?

 

All I know is this. A vast quantity of payments is unaccounted for in the statements and I want to know where it has been apportioned. Can you help?

 

SAR to the Insurers to find out if they hold any data on me perhaps?

 

Thanks.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

eie

thought your mortgage contract stated that block buildings insurance was mandatory unless you provided proof that you had insurance with someone else(and even then they still tried to levy the charge so are probably lying yet again)IN ALL PROBABILITY YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED FROM THE OUTSET THIS WAS NORMAL POLICY UNTIL YOU PROVED OTHERWISE.

Further to previous posts:

HOW CAN YOU HAVE A CONTRACTURAL AGREEMENT WITH SOMEONE TO COLLECT PAYMENTS FOR YOU AND DENY THAT YOU ARE NOT CONTROLLING THE MORTGAGE LOANS AND CARRYING OUT A REGULATED ACTIVITY ILLEGALLY???

EG INSTRUCTING CAPSTONE TO TRANSFER LEGAL TITLE AND COLLECTION ACCOUNT BECAUSE OF THE IMMINENT INSOLVENCY 0F SPPL.

SOMEONE WITH ACCESS ,MORE SPV ACCOUNTS REQUIRED AS EVIDENCE PLEASE.

Edited by ryde
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here! there's me only and 11 guests something must have hit a nerve!!

bring on the pain,slowly but bottomless and with abyss like intensity.

It's comin' and soon.

Edited by ryde
Link to post
Share on other sites

It spiked last time brokerage was detailed as well. We should go back through it. They certainly don't like the risk factors from the prospectuses being discussed. That much we do know.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed those spikes too.. very interesting.. and I think those of you who have mentioned disclosure of the contract giving rise to the SPVs as beneficiaries are making some of the right moves..

 

As for regulated activities, I wonder if the servicer's authorisation provides sufficient cover for the SPV as far as the legals and fsa are concerned - is this how it's currently viewed?

 

It would certainly help if we all had some inside help, a whistleblower.. perhaps CAG & the Daily Mail can get together to make it financially rewarding for someone to come forward..

 

From another angle, it may please some that I now have contacts in Vertex - former and current employees. It's worth bearing in mind, however, that Vertex are in the business of outsourced CRM solutions and have a very large number of clients & not just in the UK. Vertex & these clients will be very quick to distance themselves from potentially damaging activities.

 

Zil..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to include this:

 

Based on my previous post, it is now a good time for everyone to put in SARs to Vertex. Remember to state that you also want to see agent notes/comments, call logs (they use integrated data/telecoms), a report that lists database access times, actions taken (ie print run, comments added, fields changed) and any additional modifications made to your files. Transcripts of recorded calls as well as copies in a listenable format.. etc etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the fun, if anyone wants to do this (and if you have a connection with vertex you should do it)...heres a template SAR. Don't forget your £10 cheque or postal order.

 

YOUR ADDRESS

 

THE DATE

 

The Information Controller,

Vertex Ltd,

Pegasus House,

Kings Business Park,

Liverpool,

Prescot,

Merseyside, L34 1PJ.

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST BY OPERATION OF s.7 OF THE DATA PROTECTION ACT, 1998

 

Dear Sirs,

 

You currently hold details of my personal and financial information within your internal record systems with regard to my personal loan account/ mortgage as numbered above.

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my history with your organization and do so by reasonable return as you are required to. Please provide the following for this account or associated accounts I have held with your organisation, or those that have been transferred to other organisations:

 

1. The opening balance of the mortgage (you are claiming possession for), the current balance, the total amount paid in the lifetime of the account, the status of the loan as interest only or repayment plus interest and the level of interest rate applied month by month in the lifetime of the account. Please also confirm my current interest rate Additionally you should furnish me with all prior copies of correspondence I have received from yourselves or your collecting agents, or any other collecting organisation, including all correspondence made during the lifetime of the account

 

2. I require details of the date my mortgage with you was securitized, details of the required and relevant entry to the land registry title as a result of said securitization, date of any repurchase of the mortgage and all information regarding the subsequent further amendment or updates of the entry to the land registry title XXXXXXX

 

3. Full copies of all contracts, including the original terms and conditions, pertaining at the time of the agreement, which you believe exist or have existed between myself and your organization, including true copies of any documents you hold in support of the same.

 

4. A complete list of all transactions or statements relating to my mortgage with your organization.

 

5. Copies of all documents which include any of my personal information including copies of any contacts or invoices, emails or computer records containing my personal information, or any records, for example telephone calls, which pertain to this information.

 

6. Full copies or transcripts of any correspondence in postal, email or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organization or third party which contains my personal or financial information, or which pertains to me.

 

7. Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

 

8. Full hard copy print outs of my personal or financial information, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage devices or locations.

 

9. All documents you have held or do hold pertaining to Land registry title XXXXXXXX

 

I enclose a cheque in the sum of £10 to cover your fee. Note that this is not payment towards any alleged arrears on this account and is solely for the purposes of expediting the Subject Access Request.

 

AS YOU KNOW YOU ARE REQUIRED IN LAW BY VARIOUS STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND REGULATORY AND LICENSING AUTHORITIES TO PRESERVE AND SECURE ALL SUCH DATA.

 

ONLY ADD THE FOLLOWING WHERE LITIGATION HAS COMMENCED

 

In addition I remind you of the following provision under the Data Protection Act (1998)

DPA, Pt IV, 35:

35 Disclosures required by law or made in connection with legal proceedings etc

(1) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is required by or under any enactment, by any rule of law or by the order of a court.

 

(2) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions where the disclosure is necessary—

 

(a) for the purpose of, or in connection with, any legal proceedings (including prospective legal proceedings), or

 

(b) for the purpose of obtaining legal advice, or is otherwise necessary for the purposes of establishing, exercising or defending legal rights.

 

You are reminded of your obligations under the above section of the relevant legislation. I will naturally inform INFORMATION COMMISIONER/COURT (ADD or Delete as appropriate) of any failings of yours in regards to your full compliance to this subject access request.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

BLITZ EM WITH AN AMENDED COPY OF THIS AND LET"S START THE FUN ALL OVER AGAIN...we had joy, we had fun, we had vertex on the run...but the joy didn't last coz the b*****ds ran too fast...

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

..for me the deletion of 'napiernuts', own posts, pretty much sums it up. It would not be the first time, it has deleted its own posts, having exposed itself.

 

i leave you with IS IT ME?, still walking point.

 

as for arguments in court, you are allowed several defences, whether it is who owns your mortgage, the Norgan rule, the pre-action protocols etc. They are all valid, the order you choose is upto you.

 

i also think Ryde, may have something from the prospectus, the SPV as an unlicensed lender, with the subsequent validity of the contract-well worth looking into(OP).

 

 

 

 

ITBG?

end game.

Edited by I'm the bad guy?

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6236

 

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

 

SHUT'EM DOWN!!!!> SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL

Link to post
Share on other sites

The annual accounts for Mortgage Funding 2008-1 plc of whom my mortgage is securitised with clearly states the following

 

"The mortgages underlying the loans to originators are administered by Capstone Mortgage Services Limited on behalf of Mortgage Funding 2008-1 plc"

 

Conclusive proof that they are pulling all the strings in my book!!

 

Sced

Edited by scedminc
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for pm LD sorry have just seen it ,pc was left on so I was logged in.

A sure sign that "jackals"( a lord caggerism!) are on site perhaps we should pm the miscreant and ask for his advice'

Must say you have hidden talents as both a translator of L.C.'s cryptic posts and decipherer of code not ex Mi5/6 are you?

sced

cheers for that again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..for me the deletion of 'napiernuts', own posts, pretty much sums it up. It would not be the first time, it has deleted its own posts, having exposed itself.

 

i leave you with IS IT ME?, still walking point.

 

as for arguments in court, you are allowed several defences, whether it is who owns your mortgage, the Norgan rule, the pre-action protocols etc. They are all valid, the order you choose is upto you.

 

i also think Ryde, may have something from the prospectus, the SPV as an unlicensed lender, with the subsequent validity of the contract-well worth looking into

 

ITBG?

end game.

 

I AM LEGEND

 

 

IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN YOU FECKERS

CRAWL BACK TO YOUR BOOK CLUB,DEBATING SOCIETY,TALKING BOOKS,SLIPPERS AND PIPE AND SCONES.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL

WHEN THE SH.T STARTS TO FLY AND THERES NOWHERE TO HIDE STAND TALL.

ITS THE LAW O THE JUNGLE AND YOU'RE BOTTOM O' THE FOOD CHAIN SO GET A PAIR AND A SET O' TEETH

Link to post
Share on other sites

I AM LEGEND

 

 

IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN YOU FECKERS

CRAWL BACK TO YOUR BOOK CLUB,DEBATING SOCIETY,TALKING BOOKS,SLIPPERS AND PIPE AND SCONES.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL

WHEN THE SH.T STARTS TO FLY AND THERES NOWHERE TO HIDE STAND TALL.

ITS THE LAW O THE JUNGLE AND YOU'RE BOTTOM O' THE FOOD CHAIN SO GET A PAIR AND A SET O' TEETH

 

Yo Cuz ITBG? ya cover so busted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot Jackal Radar Am Outta Here

For The Record Am Not Itbg

But The Boy Stands Tall

Anyway You Can Make Your Own Feckin Minds Up

Ohwotarewetodo From Bein An Itbg Acolyte And Changin Your Identity To Suit Youve Now Changed Your Stripes You 2 Faced Fecker.have You Got A Mind Of Your Own Or A...mind Ain't Seen Much Come From It

How Do Like THEM Tea And Biscuits

Edited by IAMTHEWHISTLEBLOWER
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for pm LD sorry have just seen it ,pc was left on so I was logged in.

A sure sign that "jackals"( a lord caggerism!) are on site perhaps we should pm the miscreant and ask for his advice'

Must say you have hidden talents as both a translator of L.C.'s cryptic posts and decipherer of code not ex Mi5/6 are you?

 

I wish I was Ryde unfortunately,I'm not as thick as I look ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LD

As starter of the longest and by far the most interesting thread in cag history I think I speak for everyone when I state that you have now almost achieved the cult status of near sainthood and may soon be referred to as the reverend mother dotty or sister dotty.

Important question Didn't that ronald dahl write a book called the ITBG or was it the ITBFG?

(Have to have little breaks of nonsense now and again)(wheres kegi,investing I suppose down the local tap)

Edited by ryde
Link to post
Share on other sites

LD

As starter of the longest and by far the most interesting thread in cag history I think I speak for everyone when I state that you have now almost achieved the cult status of near sainthood and may soon be referred to as the reverend mother dotty or sister dotty.

Important question Didn't that ronald dahl write a book called the ITBG or was it the ITBFG?

 

Ryde

 

the Roald Dahl book was the bfg)big friendly giant).

I think sister dotty sounds better!! I agree with the little breaks of nonsense,everyone needs a chuckle now & then to make light of the situation.

What I don't like is all these jackals interefering & the other pettiness that has been occuring..for god sakes my children behave better than most on here!! It's like listening to the house of commons on budget day,all the big kids spitting there dummies out.

I left playground bitching at school.

Anyone found posting nonsense again,I will ask mods to block from using thread...keep it real!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LD

As starter of the longest and by far the most interesting thread in cag history I think I speak for everyone when I state that you have now almost achieved the cult status of near sainthood and may soon be referred to as the reverend mother dotty or sister dotty.

Important question Didn't that ronald dahl write a book called the ITBG or was it the ITBFG?

(Have to have little breaks of nonsense now and again)(wheres kegi,investing I suppose down the local tap)

 

 

Ryde

 

Roald Dhal: The BFG.:)

 

the big fat gob. tbfg in a different context for itbg/itgg!;)

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice one sister dotty:)

 

i must agree, it has all become rather tedious and boring...lets get back to business...

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapstone

 

Glad to see you back. Something has been bugging me for ages. I can't find any proof that they have signed me up for block buildings and they say I am definitely not on it. How the hell can they prove as opposed to assert, a negative?

 

All I know is this. A vast quantity of payments is unaccounted for in the statements and I want to know where it has been apportioned. Can you help?

 

SAR to the Insurers to find out if they hold any data on me perhaps?

 

Thanks.

 

Hi EIE,

 

You should be able to see any added insurance payments on your statements or the SAR from them. The broker signed us up from the outset and we've had several since then as they 'lose' any insurance documents you supply of your own.

 

Do you mean that some part of your payments have gone missing? Or is it that you have unexplained added charges?

 

Don't forget that they use over payment to address the charges first and try to keep you looking as though you are in arrears for as long as they can.

 

By all means send an SAR to the insurance company and if it's been a while..do another to your lender. I've done several and they all come back with different things that fit together in the jigsaw. The person with the black pen easily forgets........

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryde

 

the Roald Dahl book was the bfg)big friendly giant).

I think sister dotty sounds better!! I agree with the little breaks of nonsense,everyone needs a chuckle now & then to make light of the situation.

What I don't like is all these jackals interefering & the other pettiness that has been occuring..for god sakes my children behave better than most on here!! It's like listening to the house of commons on budget day,all the big kids spitting there dummies out.

I left playground bitching at school.

Anyone found posting nonsense again,I will ask mods to block from using thread...keep it real!!! :)

 

I couldn't agree more Sister Dotty!

 

It puts folks off reading and posting here when there is such rubbish being banded about. It's something we don't need when we all have put so much in and have been in the fight for so long. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...