Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loan Maker Broker/Advantage/ADV2/Paragon/MARS - Secured 2nd charge debt consolidation Loan May 2007 - still owe more than i borrowed!!


Recommended Posts

Hi, iam new i am not sure if i am posting in the correct thread but i need a bit of help.

I am currently sending off for several SARs the most important being a £35k secured loan which is in arrears.

I think there may be a few things i can have them for such as unfair charges , secret commissions, cca not being correct ( if they have one) Its with ADV2 ( they were called advantage but ceased trading)

Is it right that because its unregulated i dont really have a leg to stand on and cant class it as voidable or unenforceable.

????

I was approached by solicitors to look into this but have decided to go it alone with all of the issues, SARS and PPi i am pursuing.

It would be great if you could advise.

Ive not sent any SARS yet waiting till end of month when i have money to send the £10 cheques.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DONT SEND CHEQUES

 

Also as the loan was for over £25k then they are not covered under the cca laws.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes send a postal order

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi does anyone know if its a lot more difficult to prove and have a secured UNREGULATED loan proved unenforceable????

I dont know if i should go ahead if i have no chance.

I do believe there are discrepancies with it all but was told that as its unregulated ( over 25k) i dont have a leg to stand on??

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because it's over £25k doesn't necessarily make it Unregulated.

There's a thread on s.18 of the CCA.

Take a stroll down this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/171037-multiple-agreements-falling-within.html

It also depends when the loan was taken out.

Tell us more and we may be able to help..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan was for 35k, its now more due to charges.

There is no broker fee stated on the limted paperwork i have

only says 495 completion fee to the company not the broker.

Ive had unlawful charges on it.

3 x £50 charge in one month for being in arrears, and calls ive never received.

I know its classed as a mortgage / secured loan but there must be some way of making sure they have done everything above board and act n it if they havent.

On recent paperwork they refer to it as a mortgage

but when i asked them to change it to interest only while i pay off the arrears then they said that its not a mortgage.

I dont know where i stand? and my rights.

ment to add it was taken may 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it is described as a mortgage on the agreement then there are grounds to examine the contract for fair or unfair clauses

- however I believe this is a lot more inticate process than anything CCA regulated.

 

Unless there are other experts on the forum I would maybe suggest a debt checking company as you would need a solicitor to audit the mortgage properly as you would not want to jeopardise your home for the sake of £3-400.

 

ment to add it was taken may 2007

 

The Consumer Credit Act was amended so that agreements dated after April 6th 2007 were automatically compliant.

 

However "mortgages" might be a different matter

- but do you want to gamble on anything secured on your home

- perhaps you should let a specialist company look at your mortgage for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Ive recently been told this debt - second charge has been passed on to Paragon.

 

Its been bought 3 times now,

is it worth sending for the SAR even though i have arrears on this?

Also we went through a broker and there's no commission stated on any paper work i have ( its not all complete )

 

I really dont know whether its worth going for or am i risking angering them and risking my house?

I need a good loan checking company but dont know where to go, any ideas???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morgan,

How much was the loan for (before interest) ?

Do you know how much the commission was roughly ?

Was there PPI or insurance included as part of the loan ?

Was the loan a consolidation loan (ie: amalgamating previous debts or loans into one).

If your answer is yes to any of the above, then it may have been improperly executed (and so unenforceable).

and/or the actual loan amount may have been less than £25k, and so making it subject to the CCA74 (ie: regulated).

Do you have a copy of the agreement ?

Can you post up a copy ( use photobucket, and remove any personal details). Or can you post up as much infor as poss?.

No harm asking for the agreement, that is your right.

Not sure where you stand regards withholding payments whilst waiting for it?

Think you are entitled to do so, until they can prove the debt, and then come to an agreement to catch up afterwards should they actually produce one.

Others may advise also.

Best regards

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The loan was for debt consolidation, it was £35k

I havent got all the paperwork, i need to SAR them for it. It has no ppi on it as i turned that down.

I have had lots of charges added to it, some for calls, letters etc.

It was taken through loan makers and says on my paperwork they got no fee only the £495 lenders admin fee, it says £0 for introducers fee.

Cash amount is 35k, it says 300 monthly payments of £478 starting 1 month after date we advance the loan,

your first monthly payment will increase to cover the additional interest accrued.

The lenders admin fee is added to the credit i have borrowed.

Thats all the info it says on the document i have.

It was taken out 4/6/2007.

Any advice will be welcome as i didnt want to risk my house as i am working so hard to pay off all my debts and not going under.

It doesnt say on the document i signed how much of the loan will be interest it says loan amount 35k,

it hasnt got the £495 admin fee in there, should be in the total shouldn't it?? and it just says 17.4% interest, is that right??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have a look how to do it,

wont be able to scan it till tomorrow , i hope you can take a look then.

If its all above board i dont mind paying it, but ive always felt theres something not right.

Thanks so much for taking time to have a look though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, just edit out your name, address, account number etc.

If this was a consolidation Loan it will be interesting to see it.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Morgan,

I've taken a quick look at your agreement.

As It's over the £25k sum it is not covered by CCA74.

HOWEVER:

1/ Was the loan for repaying several other debts/ loans ?

2/ If so, how was the loan paid? Was it paid to you in one lump sum into an account or by cheque etc.... or were several other loans/ overdrafts/ credit cards/ etc repaid using the funds? And if so, how were they paid.

If it was the case that several other debts were paid off using the loan, and they were paid directly by the lender to the other lenders, you may have a case for claiming that the loan was deliberately constructed in such a way as to avoid regulation under CCA, and I do believe this would be wrong and unlawful.

3/ The commission.

You say there was commission involved. It does not appear on agreement?

Were you informed formally of this before the loan ?

You may have a case for claiming if proper formalities were not abided by.

You should do a search of the forums (use he search button at top) for secret commissions.

Best regards

PM

PS: Anyone else wish to comment ?

 

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, it was paid to other companies such as mortgage arrears, some on a loan and some to me of which i wasted and spent rather than [pay things off ( stupidly )

I dont know yet if there was any commission but i paid nothing to loan makers and they had to have had something for doing it i should think??

So, what would you suggest now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morgan,

I am no expert here, however your case is interesting as I have seen other similar cases on CAG, and so I will try to speak to them, to get some advice, and also ask them to look at your case.

I suggest you start your own thread on this, and post a link to it in here.

Regards

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

ow do I post a link here?

thanks so much for the advice I'll wait to hear from people.

this loan was the worst thing I ever did

I only wanted a short term option not realising that it would push me further down and be unable to remortgage,

wish I had done my research not just gone to a broker and gone along with a secured loan

I didn't know any of the penalties.

I have an unregulated secured loan for £35k it was taken out june 2007.

It was used as a consolidation loan.

Ill post a link to where i have just posted this as i have a copy of the signed agreement i kept on there.

I have not sent off for a SAR yet but would be interested to see what the broker got as i never paid a fee and it says £0 also on my signed agreement.

I dont know if i have a case to challenge it or even how i would do that, i dont want to risk my home in anyway as i am fighting each month to pay everything.

The loan was with advantage ( a sub prime lender) then it changed to ADV2 now they have been bought and my loans with Paragon

does anyone have any ideas if its enforceable

The £25k limit was removed from the act under CCA 2006. Not sure when this actually came into force? Was this a securred loan?

AGREEMENTS REGULATED UNDER THE 1974 ACT

Section 1: Definition of "individual"

  • 15. Section 1 amends section 189(1) of the 1974 Act to provide a new definition of "individual". This restricts the partnerships that are to be regarded as "individuals" to those consisting of two or three partners, not all of whom are bodies corporate. This means that in future borrowing or hire by partnerships of more than three members will not be covered by the 1974 Act, i.e. these partnerships will be treated in the same way as bodies corporate.

Section 2: Removal of financial limits etc.

16. Section 2 removes the financial limit for the regulation of consumer credit and consumer hire agreements under the 1974 Act. The 1974 Act currently applies only to agreements where credit provided or the hire payments to be made do not exceed £25,000.

In future, all consumer credit and consumer hire agreements will be regulated by the 1974 Act unless specifically exempted, regardless of the amount of the credit or the amount of the hire payments. Section 2(3) extends the application of the provisions regulating credit advertisements to advertisements offering credit regardless of the sum involved, and regardless of whether the creditor requires security.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morgan,

You could also claim that they actually owe YOU!

This agreement states £35,000 Cash Loan. As they used it to pay off other debts without you seeing a penny of it, then they owe you the FULL amount.

Simply, the agreement states Cash Loan, therefore you should have received £35,000. Not the small change from their personal spending spree.

Argue they cleared all other debts for you, as this was not agreed on the Agreement, and they owe you £35,000.

This is also a typical con to dodge regulation of the Act.

How much was each debt that was paid off?

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was a secured loan, didnt really know what that was when i took it out just thought it was a short term option ( how stupid i was )

Thanks for everyone commenting i really appreciate any help with this, £35,000 ( well nearer £40,000 now as charges added and arrears) is a hell of a lot of money

Link to post
Share on other sites

I`ve just noticed on Morgans CCA, that in the small print it states you agreed to allow them to use part of the Loan to pay off other debts.

Do you know how much each debt was? This should have been a Multiple agreement.

Morgan, you have left your Account Number on the Agreement, top right corner.

Edit it out and resave!

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there was 2 loans 10,000 each, only paid part of one off, overdrafts and mortgage arrears, i really cant remember, it desnt say anywhere, i guess i could find out exactly, i know i didnt use the cash that was left wisely. If i SAR them i could see where each bit went.

I know that they only paid a few bits and i had a bit left of it to blow.

I think HSBC wouldnt let them pay the loan directly ( was 10k i think) so they gave it to me to pay them which i paid most , not all.

I dont think ill be entitled to anything as they only paid a few bits off, but figures wise am not sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Errrrrm,

Do you realise the repayment on this Loan is £143,400?

No wonder they added it all together to avoid regulation.

This is WAR!

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

£143,400 ?? Oh god thats extortionate???? What a fool i was?? I am never going to get out of this.

I got the secured loan , idea was to clear debts then remortgage after a couple of months,

i did it in haste and things are far worse now financially

i am pretty clued up and have CCA several companies and claimed lots of charges back but THIS i have no idea with or where to go,

its going to make me lose my house if i fight it i fear but ive been totally suckered in with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...