Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning,  I have recieved a reply from my request for information. They have replied with the credit agreements for my 118 loan and two Captial One cards.  They have said thay as Vodafone is a telecommunications account it is not regulated so the original creditor is not obliged to provide a copy of the agreement.  What are my next steps?  Thank you 
    • Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim   I see Sunak and his crew have been shown to be liars at the first outing, including lying about what senior civil servants have said (all on top of Sunak trying to deflect some their own DEFINED budget black hole onto labour) No surprises there then Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK In a humiliating moment in the election for the prime minister, a scathing letter from top Treasury officials revealed that the figures...  
    • Three Trump allies charged in Wisconsin fake elector scheme   "Last year, the 10 fake electors from Wisconsin disavowed their attempt to overturn Trump’s defeat in 2020, recognized the legitimacy of President Joe Biden’s victory, and pledged not to serve as real electors in 2024 or any election when Trump is on the ballot – or to act as sham electors in any future election, as part of a civil lawsuit settlement. The 10 fake electors issued a statement acknowledging that the phony certificates they signed in December 2020 were “used as part of an attempt to improperly overturn” the lawful election results."   Three Trump allies charged in Wisconsin fake elector scheme | CNN Politics EDITION.CNN.COM The Wisconsin attorney general on Tuesday filed charges against three allies of Donald Trump accused of taking part in the effort to...  
    • Thanks all. Think I have come to a plan dx please correct me if I am getting you wrong but I am going to go down the route you suggest. simply stop payments for now until I receive a DN and it gets marked on my file. Then contact each lender and start making token payments to each one. i then assume most like they will then at some point sell to DCA. Once they are sold I’ll be coming back to see how best I deal with it.  Let me know if I am making some error in judgment or missing anything with my plan 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statue Barred? Ferratum


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi chaps, apologies if this is in the wrong section - Just a quick one!

 

Quite a few years ago, I got into debt with quite a few PayDay loan companies 'Ferratum' or their sub company being one.

I went through a DMP and thought I nipped everything in the bud, I was wrong.

 

A few months ago I received a letter from CRS - typical demands etc.

I was totally unaware of this as I thought I paid off all debts, this prompted me to go through my credit file, low and behold there's notes from Ferratum (debt/late payments etc - how I didn't spot that before is beyong me as my score was pretty darn good!).

 

However, after checking my score a week a so or go, Ferratum has completely been removed from my credit file (this loan was about 6-7 years ago) and I think it had a start date of Dec 2013 when payments were late.

 

I just got an email from CRS stating they are looking to start legal proceedings now.

 

My question is, with it being removed from my credit file, does that mean time has elapsed and it is now classed as statue barred?

Do I need to send a letter to CRS to state this?

 

Thanks, Rob!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore powerless DCA's totally

 

who is their stated client?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The email is from CRS (credit source solution), the client is Ferratum UK Ltd (stated in the email) - checking a few weeks back, it was Ferratum on my credit profile. Just been so busy recently, totally skipped my mind to peruse. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should always be blocking and bouncing all emails regarding debt

same as phonecalls.

 

deal with the OC as they still own the debt.

 

the fact that the default has reached its 6th birthday

whereby it and the account gets removed from your file is immaterial to if a debt is statute barred or not as you might have paid after the default was registered.

 

so you need to workout your last payment date.

and have you moved since taking this PDL out too?

 

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, gotcha! Need to remember that, D'oh! I my DMP finished over 6-7 years ago, so any last payments to any payday loans would have been well over 6+ years - which is why I was thinking Statue barred

 

Correct, I've moved around 2 3/4 years ago, I've received nothing from the old address either (still occupied too - family)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its unusual for OC's to chase statute barred debts lets put it that way

but

theres nothing to say they haven't a clue CRS are doing this

it could well be CRS are after free money for their xmas party drinks and think that by sending people out a few free emails

some mug might know no better and donate to them.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them pay for their own Xmas party! OK, so from what I believe, it's statue barred (as it's most likely almost 7 years since my last payment), I don't even know how much what was paid it was that long ago, but certainly 6+years ago.

 

Should I send them a Statue barred letter/email, as I received this today:

PENDING LEGAL ACTION

We have not received payment of the overdue balance and you have not made use of our online customer portal to set up a suitable and affordable payment arrangement.

Our client has authorised us to progress this matter to our Solicitors to commence the legal action against you via the County Court, therefore please contact us to discuss this matter so we can reach an appropriate resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What part of never use email

Never communicate with a powerless dca hasnt been understood?

 

If you want to do anything which you should as it also protects your backdoor if the debt were to be sold and a DCA were to litigate as it stands..send our sb letter from the debt collection section of our library

 

Thats goes to the oc as they still own the debt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just a wee update on this,

I sent a recorded delivery Statue Barred letter a few days after.

 

On 19th I then received a letter from SilverBackLaw acting on behalf of CRS (no letter response from them).

This appears to be a letter with them asking me to reply/submit a form accepting/rejecting the balance,

should I send a further recorded letter to CRS?

This one has just threw me a little 🤦🏻‍♂️

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean a letter of claim?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure to be honest, this is the cover letter, within are 3 pages (2 are forms); 'do you owe the debt?' - will you pay... Finally an incoming/outgoing form, sounds fishy to me!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

images/posts removed
.
please do not post jpg picture images directly to a post
.
read upload and redact in jpg then convert using on of the listed websites there to convert to one multipage pdf only

.
that way only logged-in,registered and approved caggers are the only ones that can download and see them
.
else anyone can see them caggers or not.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do the letters look like the following ?

 

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darn! For some reason it won't let me add a .pdf of the file. It says

 

"We act for the above named and have been instructed to write to you to demamd payment of the sum of ££ which sum may include or solely be related to costs.

 

The contract between you and our client was established in writing... Blar blar ' you have received this letter a business intends to take you to court'

 

Can this be done on Statue Barres debts? 

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ofcourse not, but they'll try and scare you.

who did you send the SB letter too?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! I sent it direclty to CRS, recorded delivery, wasn't sure if i had to send it directly to Ferratum, assuming CRS are the collectors.

 

I've seen somewhere there's a follow-up letter to SB if they persist, am I right or in coo-coo-land?

I think it may be best sending one to ferratum too 🤔

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just type..we know what we have said..

 

Three times i said send it to the oc...ignore the dca

And you wasted money on recorded delivery..

 

just use 1st class with free proof of posting from any po counter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update on this.

 

I did re-send the letter(s) directly to Ferratum (also to the DCA to be certain). To date, although blocking CRS, they are still filtering through and threatening court action. Out of the blue too, I receive contact directly from Ferrtum - I've not requested anything from them. They have included a screenshot of when the loan was taken 16.04.2013 and the credit agreement.

 

"Further to your recent request please find attached loan agreement and details of your loan. To date we have received no payments towards this account and the outstanding balance is £336.40. Since issuing your loan the regulations have changed and there is now a cap in place to ensure a loan does not exceed double the amount borrowed, I have therefore applied a credit to your account to adjust the outstanding amount to £195.00."

 

£195 sounds better though 😆

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt is statute barred

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for your help.

They also included the Due Date which was 26.04.13, so they must have not applied the default until Dec  in 2019 that's when it was removed. 

 

What action should I take if I continue to receive correspondence from CRS 'impending court action'  or receive another letter or even a County Court Claim from these 'apparent' solicitors?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt is statute barred

 

only the debt owner can issue a letter of claim or a court claim. via a solicitor

original creditors do not do court.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

told you all this in post 2 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 29/01/2020 at 17:28, dx100uk said:

told you all this in post 2 

Just a quick update on this one, bit of an odd one. After sending a few letters, (thanks), emails etc and 'solicitors' letters stopped. 

 

However, received an email not long ago (direct) from Ferratum advising they wrote off part of the balance due to new regulations. However, the default SB dec 2019 and come off my record then (dec 2019), but this new 'updated' balance has been added to my file from 2020, can they do that? 

 

 

Edited by Birmo0803
Link to post
Share on other sites

no they cant bring it back .

Default has past 6yrs

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...